Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:06:00.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introducing expert critiquing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Sture Hägglund
Affiliation:
Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden (Email: [email protected])

Extract

Expert critiquing systems present an interesting and important complement to conventional expert systems. The basic idea is to emphasize the support for the user's own decision making rather than to let the system independently suggest a solution to a given problem. Thus it is assumed that the user initially proposes a decision or course of action. The system then reviews this suggestion relative to known circumstance, tries to evaluate the proposed solution, provides suggestions for improvements, draws attention to possible risks, indicates alternatives, and evaluates their merits, etc. A critiquing system is characterized both by its approach to problem solving and by its style of interaction with the user, as will be detailed below.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clancey, WJ, 1977. “An antibiotic therapy advisor which provides for explanations” In: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence p 858, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fickas, S and Nagrajan, P, 1988. “Critiquing software specificationsIEEE Software 5 (6) 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G, 1987. “A Critic for LISP“ In: Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence pp 177184, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
Fischer, G, Nakakoji, K, Ostwald, J, Stahl, G and Summer, T, 1993. “Embedding critics in integrated design environmentsThe Knowl. Eng. Rev. 8 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HÄgglund, S and Rankin, I, 1988. “Investigating the usability of expert critiquing in knowledge-based consultation systems” In: Proceedings of the ECAI'88 Conference pp 152154, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Kelly, VE, 1984. “The CRITTER system: Automated critiquing of digital circuits design” In: Proceedings of the 21st Design Automation Conference pp 419425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, CP and Shortliffe, EH, 1983. “Adapting a consultation system to critique user plansInt. J. Man-Machine Studies 19 479496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P, 1986. Expert Critiquing Systems, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, TA, Gardner, RM, Clayton, PD and Warner, HR, 1983. “The HELP systemJ. Medical Syst. 7 (2) 87102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rankin, I, 1983. “Natural language generation in critiquingThe Knowl. Eng. Rev. 8 (4).Google Scholar
Silverman, BG et al. , 1987. “COPE: A Case Oriented Processing Environment” In: Proceedings of the European Computing Conference, Avignon, France.Google Scholar
Silverman, BG, 1992a. “Survey of expert critiquing systems: Practical and theoretical frontiersComm. ACM 35 (4) 106127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, BG, 1992b. Critiquing Human Error. A Knowledge Based Human–Computer Approach, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, BG, 1993. “Engineering expert critics for cooperative systemsThe Knowl. Eng. Rev. 8 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lei, J, 1991. Critiquing based on computer-stored medical records, PhD dissertation, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar