No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Once Again: What is the ‘First Proposition’ in Kant's Groundwork? Some Refinements, a New Proposal, and a Reply to Henry Allison
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2012
Abstract
Discussing the concept of duty in Groundwork 1, Kant refers to a ‘second proposition’ and a ‘third proposition’, the latter being a ‘Folgerung aus beiden vorigen’. However, Kant does not identify what the ‘first proposition’ is. In this paper, I will argue that the first proposition is this: An action from duty is an action from respect for the moral law. I defend this claim against a critique put forward by Allison according to which ‘respect’ is a concept that is not, and could not be, introduced in paragraphs 9–13 of Groundwork 1. Further, I will argue that the first proposition as I understand it can also be reconstructed as the conclusion (‘Folgerung’) of a deductive argument proper; however, I will also discuss the option that ‘Folgerung’ could be understood as a corollary rather than a conclusion. Finally, Allison's own interpretation will be criticized.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Kantian Review 2012
References
Allison, Henry E. (2011) Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damschen, GregorSchönecker, Dieter (2012) Selbst philosophieren: Ein Methodenbuch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudiger, Jürg (1993) Kants Begründung der praktischen Philosophie: Systematische Stellung, Methode und Argumentationsstruktur der ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten’. Bern: Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
Horn, ChristophMieth, CorinnaScarano, Nico (2007) ‘Kommentar’ [on Kant's GMS]. In Immanuel Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Kommentar von Ch. Horn, C. Mieth und N. Scarano. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1959) Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What is Enlightenment? Trans., with an introduction, by Lewis White Beck. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Fondazione della Metafisica dei costumi. Trans. and ed. Filippo Gonnelli. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Allen Wood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A German-English Edition. Trans. and ed. Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter (2001) ‘What is the “First Proposition” Regarding Duty in Kant's Groundwork?’ In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann, and Ralph Schumacher (eds), Proceedings of the Ninth International Kant-Congress (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter (2007) ‘Review of Jens Timmermann (ed.), “Immanuel Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”’. Kantian Review, 12, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter (2009) ‘The Transition from Common Rational to Philosophical Rational Moral Knowledge in the Groundwork’. In Karl Ameriks and Otfried Höffe (eds), Kant's Moral and Legal Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 93–122.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally (2008) Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2004) Immanuel Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten Herausgegeben, eingeleitet und erläutert von Jens Timmermann. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar