Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:47:56.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Rationalism and Demandingness in Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Marcel van Ackeren  and
Martin Sticker
Marcel van Ackeren*
Affiliation:
Mansfield College, Oxford
Martin Sticker*
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss Kant’s conception of moral rationalism from the viewpoint of recent debates, which have distinguished different forms of moral rationalism. We argue that Kant’s version, ‘silencing’, is different and stronger than currently held versions of moral rationalism and that it also differs from versions of silencing that contemporary thinkers advocate. We then discuss Kant’s version of silencing in the context of the moral demandingness debate and argue that silencing can make a perfect duty very demanding. However, it is important that whilst in cases of conflict between duty and personal happiness the normative standing of the latter is silenced, silencing does not require that agents do all they can in the case of imperfect duties. We finally indicate the kind of latitude imperfect duties allow for, according to Kant’s strong form of moral rationalism.

Keywords

demandingnessoverdemandingnessoverridingnessmoral rationalismsilencinglatitude
Type
Critical Exchange
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 407 - 428
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackeren, Marcel van (2018) ‘How Morality Becomes Demanding. Cost vs. Difficulty and Restrictions’. International Journal for Philosophical Studies (Special Issue on ‘Sacrifice), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ackeren, Marcel van and Sticker, Martin (2015) ‘Kant on Moral Demandingness’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18 (1), 75–89.Google Scholar
Archer, Alfred (2014) ‘Moral Rationalism without Overridingness’. Ratio, 27 (1), 100–114.Google Scholar
Copp, David (1997) ‘The Ring of Gyges: Overridingness and the Unity of Reason’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 14 (1), 86–106.Google Scholar
Cummiskey, David (1990) ‘Kantian Consequentialism’. Ethics, 100 (3), 586–615.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan (1993) Moral Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stepehen (2006) ‘Morality and Practical Reason: A Kantian Approach’. In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 282–320.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale (2012) ‘Weak Anti-Rationalism and the Demands of Morality’. Nous, 46 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale (2016) The Limits of Moral Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine (2013) Kant’s Defense of Common Moral Experience: A Phenomenological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, James (1986) Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard (1981) Moral Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. (1992) Dignity and Practical Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad (2000) Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horty, John F. (2007) ‘Reasons as Defaults’. Philosophers’ Imprint 7, <www.philosophersimprint.org/007003/>..>Google Scholar
Horty, John F. (2012) Reasons as Defaults. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, Paul E. (2006) ‘Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All’. Ethics, 116 (4), 680–706.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Jens Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1978) ‘Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 52, 13–29.Google Scholar
Pinheiro Walla, Alice (2015) ‘Kant’s Moral Theory and Demandingness’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18 (4), 731–743.Google Scholar
Portmore, Douglas (2011) Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1999) Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel (1992) Human Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, David (2007) ‘The Impotence of the Demandingness Objection’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 7 (8), 1–17 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0007.008>..>Google Scholar
Sticker, Martin (2017a) Kant’s Criticism of Common Moral Rational Cognition’. European Journal of Philosophy, 25 (1), 85–109.Google Scholar
Sticker, Martin (2017b) ‘When the Reflective Watch-Dog Barks: Conscience and Self-Deception in Kant’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 51 (1), 85–104.Google Scholar
Stohr, Karen (2011) ‘Kantian Beneficence and the Problem of Obligatory Aid’. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 8 (1), 45–67.Google Scholar
Stroud, Sarah (1998) ‘Moral Overridingness and Moral Theory’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79 (2), 170–189.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2005) ‘Good But Not Required? Assessing the Demands of Kantian Ethics’. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 2 (1), 9–27.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007a) Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007b) ‘Simplicity and Authority: Reflections on Theory and Practice in Kant’s Moral Philosophy’. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2), 167–183.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2013) ‘Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant’s Ethical Theory’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 95 (1), 36–64.Google Scholar
Wittwer, Héctor (2010) Ist es vernünftig, moralisch zu handeln? Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Woollard, Fiona (2016) ‘Dimensions of Demandingness’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 116 (1), 89–106.Google Scholar