Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:11:57.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Refutation of Idealism: Once More Unto the Breach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Georges Dicker
Georges Dicker*
Affiliation:
The College at Brockport, State University of New York
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In ‘Kant's Refutation of Idealism’ (Noûs, 47), I defend a version of the Refutation, pioneered by Paul Guyer in Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, whose core idea is that the only way that one can know the order of one's own past experiences, except in certain rare cases, is by correlating them with the successive states of perceived external objects that caused the experiences. Andrew Chignell has offered a probing critique of my reconstruction of Kant's argument (Philosophical Quarterly, 60), and I have responded (Philosophical Quarterly, 61). In a rebuttal of my response, Chignell raises three new objections (Philosophical Quarterly, 61). My purpose in this paper is to reply to these.

Keywords

Jonathan Bennettcausal relationAndrew ChignellPaul GuyerinductionImmanuel Kantmemorymental clockP. F. Strawsontemporal succession
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , 08 June 2012 , pp. 191 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Jonathan (1966) Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2010) ‘Causal Refutations of Idealism’. Philosophical Quarterly, 60, 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2011) ‘Causal Refutations of Idealism Revisited’. Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicker, Georges (2008) ‘Kant's Refutation of Idealism’. Noûs, 42, 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicker, Georges (2011) ‘Kant's Refutation of Idealism: A Reply to Chignell’. Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1987) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1966) The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar