Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:34:54.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Kantian's Revenge: On Forster's Kant and Skepticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

Robert Hanna*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

For convenience I refer to Kant's works infratextually in parentheses. The citations include both an abbreviation of the English title and the corresponding volume and page numbers in the standard Akademie edition of Kant's works: Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. the Königlich Preussischen (now Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: G. Reimer, now de Gruyter, 1902–). For references to the first Critique, I follow the common practice of giving page numbers from the A (1781) and B (1787) German editions only. I generally follow the standard English translations from the German texts, but have occasionally modified them where appropriate. Here is a list of the English translations of the works cited:

Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. M. Gregor. In Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 37108Google Scholar.

Immanuel Kant: Philosophical Correspondence, 1759–99. Trans. A. Zweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967Google Scholar.

‘The Vienna Logic’. In Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic. Trans. J. M. Young (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 251377Google Scholar.