Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:23:40.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kantian Non-Evidentialism and its German Antecedents: Crusius, Meier and Basedow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

Brian A. Chance
Brian A. Chance*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma/Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to highlight the extent to which Kant’s account of belief draws on the views of his contemporaries. Situating the non-evidentialist features of Crusius’ account of belief within his broader account, I argue that they include antecedents to both Kant’s distinction between pragmatic and moral belief and his conception of a postulate of pure practical reason. While moving us closer to Kant’s arguments for the first postulate, however, both Crusius’ and Meier’s arguments for the immortality of the soul fail to anticipate the most important aspect of their Kantian counterparts. Developing the non-evidentialist features of Basedow’s account of belief, I distinguish it from its Pascalian and Jamesian relatives and argue that it is the clearest antecedent to Kant’s arguments for the first and second postulates. Finally, I consider the development of Kant’s account of belief after the first Critique and discuss the broader implications of my analysis.

Keywords

CrusiusMeierBasedowethics of beliefGlaubenon-evidentialismpostulates of pure practical reason
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 359 - 384
Copyright
© Kantian Review, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basedow, J. N. (1758) Praktische Philosophie für alle Stände. Copenhagen and Leipzig: Johann Benjamin Ackermann.Google Scholar
Basedow, J. N. (1764) Philalethie. Altona: David Iversen.Google Scholar
Basedow, J. N. (1765) Theoretisches System der gesunden Vernunft. Altona: David Iversen.Google Scholar
Basedow, J. N. (1777) Praktische Philosophie für alle Stände, 2nd ed. Dessau and Leipzig: Siegfried Lebrecht.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. (1987) The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chance, B. and Pasternack, L. (2018) ‘Rational Faith and the Pantheism Controversy: Kant’s “Orientation” Essay and the Evolution of his Moral Argument’. In Dahlstrom, Daniel (ed.), Kant and his German Contemporaries: Aesthetics, History, Politics, and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, A. (2007a) ‘Belief in Kant’. Philosophical Review, 116, 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, A. (2007b) ‘Kant’s Concepts of Justification’. Noûs, 41, 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, A. (2018) ‘The Ethics of Belief’. In Zalta, E. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring), viewed 21 March 2019, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/ethics-belief.Google Scholar
Crusius, C. A. (1744) Anweisung vernüftig zu leben. Leipzig: Gleditsh.Google Scholar
Crusius, C. A. (1745) Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunftwahrheiten. Leipzig: Gleditsh.Google Scholar
Crusius, C. A. (1747) Weg zur Gewissheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: Gleditsh.Google Scholar
Dyck, C. (2018) ‘G. F. Meier and Kant on the Belief in the Immortality of the Soul’. In Dyck, C. and Wunderlich, F. (eds), Kant and his German Contemporaries: Logic, Mind, Epistemology, Science and Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gava, G. (2019) ‘Kant and Crusius on Belief and Practical Justification’. Kantian Review, 24, 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. (2016) ‘Kant, Mendelssohn, and Immortality’. In Höwig, T. (ed.), The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy (Berlin: De Gruyter), pp. 157–79.Google Scholar
James, W. (1977) ‘The Will to Believe’. In McDermott, J. (ed.), The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 717–34.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (2006) Pascal’s Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1900) Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Prussian, Royal (later German, then Berlin-Brandenburg) Academy of the Sciences. Berlin: George Reimer (later Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996) Practical Philosophy. Ed. and trans. M. J. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1999) Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. P. Guyer, trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marušić, B. (2011) ‘Ethics of Belief’. Philosophy Compass, 6, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1746) Gedanken vom Zustande der Seele nach dem Tode. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1748) Vertheidigung seiner Gedanken vom Zustande der Seele nach dem Tode. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1752a) Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1752b) Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (2011) Morning Hours. Ed. and trans. D. Dahlstrom and C. Dyck. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, B. (1991) Pensées. Ed. P. Sellier. Paris: Bords.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2010) ‘Kant’s Doctrinal Belief in God’. In Thorndike, O. (ed.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 3 (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press), pp. 200–18.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2011) ‘The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, the Practical Postulates, and the Fact of Reason’. Kant-Studien, 102, 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2014) ‘Kant on Opinion: Assent, Hypothesis, and the Norms of General Applied Logic’. Kant-Studien, 105, 41–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, F. (2010) ‘The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason’. In Guyer, P. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumore, P. (2018) ‘Kant and Crusius on the Role of Immortality in Morality’. In Dyck, C. and Wunderlich, F. (eds), Kant and his German Contemporaries: Logic, Mind, Epistemology, Science and Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, L. (2003) ‘Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge’. Kantian Review, 7, 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, S. (2006) ‘Epistemic Partiality and Friendship’. Ethics, 161, 498–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warda, A. (1922) Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin: Martin Breslauer.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (2004) Vernüftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauch in Erkenntnis der Wahrheit. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1970) Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar