Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:03:07.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on Chemistry and the Application of Mathematics in Natural Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

Michael Bennett McNulty
Michael Bennett McNulty*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft, Kant claims that chemistry is a science, but not a proper science (like physics), because it does not adequately allow for the application of mathematics to its objects. This paper argues that the application of mathematics to a proper science is best thought of as depending upon a coordination between mathematically constructible concepts and those of the science. In physics, the proper science that exhausts the a priori knowledge of objects of the outer sense, only motions and concepts reducible to motions can be legitimately coordinated with mathematical constructions. Since chemistry can neither achieve its own a priori principles of coordination nor be reduced to the coordinated doctrine of motion, it is a merely improper science.

Keywords

Kantchemistryproper sciencemathematicsconstructionmechanical philosophy
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 393 - 418
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brittan, Gordon (1978) Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brittan, Gordon (1986) ‘Kant’s Two Grand Hypotheses’. In Butts (1986a: 61–94).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1986) ‘Kant’s “Special Metaphysics” and the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’. In Butts (1986a: 127–61).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butts, Robert (ed.) (1986a) Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft 1786–1986. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butts, Robert (1986b) ‘The Methodological Structure of Kant’s Metaphysics of Science’. In Butts (1986a: 163–99).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, Martin (2001) ‘Kant’s Theory of Matter and his Views on Chemistry’. In Watkins (2000: 205–30).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, Rene (1991) Principles of Philosophy. Trans. Valentine Miller and Reese Miller. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Duncan, Howard (1986) ‘Kant’s Methodology: Progress Beyond Newton?’ In Butts (1986a: 273–306).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erxleben, Johann Christian Polykarp (1775) Anfangsgründe der Chemie. Göttingen: Johann Christian Dieterich.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart (2000) Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992a) Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992b) ‘Regulative/Constitutive’. Southern Journal of Philosophy, supplement, 30, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2012) ‘Newton and Kant: Quantity of Matter in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50/3, 482–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2013) Kant’s Construction of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heis, Jeremy (forthcoming) ‘Kant on Parallel Lines’. In Ofra Rechter and Carl Posy (eds.), Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics: Modern Essays. Vol. I, The Critical Philosophy and its Background. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1902–) Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992) Lectures on Logic. Trans. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1993) Opus Postumum. Trans. Eckart Förster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004) Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Trans. Michael Friedman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Phillip (1983) ‘Kant’s Philosophy of Science’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8/1, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körner, Stephen (1955) Kant. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae (1998) Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nayak, Abhaya, and Sotnak, Eric (1995) ‘Kant on the Impossibility of the “Soft Sciences”’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55/1, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1952) Opticks: Or a Treatise on the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light. Based on the 4th edn (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
Plaass, Peter (1994) Kant’s Theory of Natural Science. Trans. Alfred Miller and Maria Miller. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1965) The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Trans. Maria Reichenbach. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst (1730) Philosophical Principles of Universal Chemistry. Trans. Peter Shaw. London: John Osborn and Thomas Longman.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel (2004) ‘The Role of Magnitude in Kant’s Critical Philosophy’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 34/3, 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, Hein (2011) ‘Kant’s Conception of Proper Science’. Synthese, 183/1, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerius, Johann Gottschalk (1761) Der Physische Chemie, Erster Theil. Trans. Christian Andreas Mangold. Gotha: Christian Mevius.Google Scholar
Warren, Daniel (2001) Reality and Impenetrability in Kant’s Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (1998) ‘The Argumentative Structure of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’. Journal for the History of Philosophy, 36/4, 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (ed.) (2000) Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (1995) ‘Kant’s Dynamic Constructions’. Journal of Philosophical Research, 20, 381–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar