Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:38:59.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on Autonomy and the Value of Persons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

Eric Entrican Wilson
Eric Entrican Wilson*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay seeks to contribute to current debates about value in Kant's ethics. Its main objective is to dislodge the widely shared intuition that his view of autonomy requires constructivism or some other alternative to moral realism. I argue the following. Kant seems to think that the value of persons is due to their very nature, not to what anyone decides is the case (however rational or pure those decisions may be). He also seems to think that when we treat persons as ends in themselves we are responding appropriately to the fact that their very nature elevates them above all other concerns. Neither of these beliefs is incompatible with his view of autonomy. So it is a mistake to think that Kant's ethics requires constructivism or any other form of anti-realism.

Keywords

autonomyconstructivismdignityperson
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , July 2013 , pp. 241 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Lanier (2001) ‘Synthesis, Cognitive Normativity, and the Meaning of Kant's Question, “How are Synthetic Cognitions A Priori Possible?”’. European Journal of Philosophy, 9(3), 275–305.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret (2003) ‘Autocracy and Autonomy’. Kant-Studien, 94(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph (1983) Five Sermons, ed. Stephen Darwall. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Graham, George (forthcoming) ‘Being a Mental Disorder’. In H. Kincaid and J. Sullivan (eds), Psychiatric Classification and Natural Kinds (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000) Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2005) Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993) The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (2007) Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E Jr., (1991) Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Robert (2007) ‘Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics’. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), vol. 2, pp. 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick (2004) ‘Self-Legislation in Kant's Moral Philosophy’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(3), 257–306.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997a) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997b) Lectures on Ethics, trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2006) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Robert B. Louden Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996a) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996b) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2008) The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae (2007) ‘Objective and Unconditioned Value’. Philosophical Review, 116(2), 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Adrienne (2006) ‘How to Argue for the Value of Humanity’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87(1), 96–125.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1986) The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1997) The Last Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1980) ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’. Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515–572.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2006) Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2011) ‘Will, Obligatory Ends, and the Completion of Practical Reason: Comments on Barbara Herman's Moral Literacy’. Kantian Review, 16(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1998) The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2009a) ‘Kant's Conception of Human Dignity’. Kant-Studien, 100(3), 309–331.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2009b) ‘Kant's Conception of Inner Value’. European Journal of Philosophy, 19(2), 262–280.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (forthcoming) ‘Constructivism and the Argument for Autonomy’. In James Lenman and Yonatan Shemmer (eds), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2006) ‘Values Without Regress: Kant's “Formula of Humanity” Revisited’. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 69–93.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007) Kant's ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David (2006) Self to Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2008) Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar