Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:11:55.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elateres Motiva: From the Good Will to the Good Human Being

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Inder Marwah
Inder Marwah*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kant's ethics has long been bedevilled by a peculiar tension. While his practical philosophy describes the moral obligations incumbent on all free, rational beings, Kant also understands moral anthropology as addressing ‘helps and hindrances’ to our moral advancement. How are we to reconcile Kant's Critical account of a transcendentally free human will with his developmental view of anthropology, history and education as assisting in our collective progress towards moral ends? I argue that Kant in fact distinguishes between the objective determination of moral principles and subjective processes of moral acculturation developing human beings’ receptivity to the moral law. By differentiating subjective and objective dimensions of moral agency, I argue (1) that we better interpret the relationship between Kant's transcendental and anthropological accounts as a division of labour between principles of obligation and principles of volition, and so, as complementary rather than contradictory; and (2) that this counters the view of Kant's ethics as overly formalistic by recognizing his ‘empirical ethics’ as attending to the unsystematizable facets of a properly human moral life.

Keywords

freedommoral anthropologymoral developmentmoral motivationgood willgood human being
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , November 2013 , pp. 413 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry (1990) Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (1996) ‘Reflections on the Banality of (Radical) Evil: A Kantian Analysis’. In Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2001) ‘Ethics, Evil, and Anthropology in Kant: Remarks on Allen Wood's Kant's Ethical Thought’. Ethics, 111, 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret (2003) ‘Autocracy and Autonomy’. Kant-Studien, 94, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1987) ‘Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant’. In J. T. J. Srzednicki (ed.), Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction: A Festschrift to Stephan Körner (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Vincent M. (1991) ‘Kant, Teleology, and Sexual Ethics’. International Philosophical Quarterly, 31, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2003) Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2005) ‘Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 5(7), 1–34.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000) Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2005) Kant's System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2010) ‘The Obligation to be Virtuous: Kant's Conception of the Tugendverpflichtung’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 27(2), 206–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993) The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kain, PatrickJacobs, Brian (2003) (eds), Essays on Kant's Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1953) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997a) Lectures on Ethics, ed. Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind, trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997b) Lectures on Metaphysics, trans. and ed. Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. and ed. Allen Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2006) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. and ed. Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1999) ‘Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 16(1), 59–80.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (2009) ‘Natural Motives and the Motive of Duty: Hume and Kant on Our Duties to Others’. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 1(2), 8–35.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert (2000) Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert (2003) ‘The Second Part of Morals’. In Patrick Kain and Brian Jacobs (eds), Essays on Kant's Anthropology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas (2009) Race, Empire and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas (1999) Kant's Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2006) Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997a) ‘Kantian Virtue: Priggish or Passional?’. In Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman and Christine Korsgaard (eds), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 270–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997b) Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip (2006) ‘Moral Motivation in Kant’. In Graham Bird (ed.), A Companion to Kant (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Holly (2006) Kant's Pragmatic Anthropology: Its Origin, Meaning, and Critical Significance. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar