Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:55:27.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Wretched Subterfuge’? Comments on Frederick Rauscher’s Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Robert B. Louden*
Affiliation:
University of Southern Maine

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author Meets Critics
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnyeat, M. F. (1983) ‘Can the Skeptic Live his Skepticism?’. Repr. in M. F. Burnyeat (ed.) The Skeptical Tradition (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983), pp. 117148.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick (2009) ‘Human Freedom and the Self’. Repr. in D. Pereboom (ed.) Free Will, 2nd edn (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2009), pp. 172184.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig (1971) Das Wesen des Christentums. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart (2000) Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1975) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd edn, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray (2006) The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. (2000) Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B (2014) ‘Cosmopolitical Unity: The Final Destiny of the Human Species.’ In A. Cohen (ed.) Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 211229.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B (2015a) ‘“The End of All Human Action”/“The Final Object of All My Conduct”: Aristotle and Kant on the Highest Good.’ In J. Aufderheide and R. M. Bader (eds) The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 112128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B (2015b) ‘Vigilantius: Morality for Humans.’ In L. Denis and O. Sensen (eds) Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 8499.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989) Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick (2015) Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Keith (1972) The Development of Kant’s Ethics. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1973) Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar