Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:35:26.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards an Unfettered Critique: Adorno’s Appropriations and Transformations of Kant’s Enlightenment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2020

Garmon D. Iago
Garmon D. Iago*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many recent commentators have noticed how Adorno, in his late works, borrows Kant’s definition of enlightenment to define key areas of his own critical practice. These discussions, however, have failed to notice how these late borrowings present an image of Kant’s enlightenment which is diametrically opposed to his previous discussions. By tracing the development of Adorno’s engagement with Kant’s essay, I discover Adorno deliberately sublating Kant’s definition as to enable its incorporation into his own works. Further, the article will examine some problems which appear to arise for Adorno when borrowing Kant’s definition of enlightenment in his late works, which coalesce around the topics of negativism and the prospects for societal change.

Keywords

enlightenmentKantAdornocritiqueautonomymaturity
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant and the Frankfurt School , December 2020 , pp. 631 - 654
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. (1970) ‘Society’. Salmagundi, 10/11, 144–53.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1973) Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1984) ‘The Essay as Form’. New German Critique, 32, 151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T. (1998a) ‘Critique’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (New York: Columbia University Press), 281–8.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1998b) ‘Education After Auschwitz’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (New York: Columbia University Press), 191–204.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1998c) ‘Marginalia to Theory and Praxis’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (New York: Columbia University Press), 259–78.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1998d) ‘Opinion Delusion Society’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (New York: Columbia University Press), 105–22.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2001a) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2001b) Metaphysics: Concepts and Problems. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2001c) Problems of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2003) ‘Late Capitalism or Industrial Society? The Fundamental Question of the Present Structure of Society’. In Rolf, Tiedemann (ed.), Can One Live After Auschwitz: A Philosophical Reader (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), 111–25.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (2005) Minima Moralia. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Adorno, T., and Becker, H. (1999) ‘Education for Maturity and Responsibility’. History of the Human Sciences, 12 (3), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T., and Horkheimer, M. (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bronner, S. (2004) Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, D. (2011) Adorno on Nature. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Cook, D. (2018) Adorno, Foucault and the Critique of the West. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D. (2010) The Enlightenement: A Genealogy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrone, V. (2015) The Enlightenment: History of an Idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Finlayson, J. G. (2002) ‘Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable’. European Journal of Philosophy, 10 (1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focuault, M. (1996) ‘What is Critique?’. In James, Schmidt (ed.), What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), 382–98.Google Scholar
Freyenhagen, F. (2013) Adorno’s Practical Philosophy: Living Less Wrongly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, E. (2006) Adorno and the Political. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1986) ‘Foucault and Adorno: Two Forms of the Critique of Modernity’. Thesis Eleven, 15 (1), 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996a) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary, J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. Allen, W. Wood and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I. (2011) ‘Cold, Cold, Warm: Autonomy, Intimacy and Maturity in Adorno’. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 37 (6), 669–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (2005) The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, B. (2013) Adorno. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Outram, D. (2013) The Enlightenment, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1978) The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. (2012) ‘Misunderstanding the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”: Venturi, Habermas, and Foucault’. History of European Ideas, 37 (1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. (2014) ‘Adorno on Kant and Enlightenment’ (in 1959): https://persistentenlightenment.com/2014/06/01/adornokant59/ (accessed May 2020).Google Scholar
Shuster, M. (2020) ‘The Critique of the Enlightenment’. In Gordon, P., Hammer, E. and Pensky, M. (eds), A Companion to Adorno (Oxford: Blackwell), 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar