Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:05:42.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Original Sin and Radical Evil: Kierkegaard and Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Roe Fremstedal
Roe Fremstedal*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By comparing the theories of evil found in Kant and Kierkegaard, this article aims to shed new light on Kierkegaard, as well as on the historical and conceptual relations between the two philosophers. The author shows that there is considerable overlap between Kant's doctrine of radical evil and Kierkegaard's views on guilt and sin and argues that Kierkegaard approved of the doctrine of radical evil. Although Kierkegaard's distinction between guilt and sin breaks radically with Kant, there are more Kantian elements in Kierkegaard than was shown by earlier scholarship. Finally, Kierkegaard provides an alternative solution to the problem of the universality of guilt, a problem much discussed in the literature on Kant.

Keywords

anthropologyguiltImmanuel KantSøren Kierkegaardmoral agencysin
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , 08 June 2012 , pp. 197 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H.E. (1995) Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, H.E. (1996) Idealism and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H.E. (2001) ‘Ethics, Evil, and Anthropology in Kant: Remarks on Allen Wood's Kant's Ethical Thought’. Ethics, 111(April), 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H.E. (2002) ‘On the Very Idea of a Propensity to Evil’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 36, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axt-Piscalar, Christine (2007) ‘Julius Müller: Parallels in the Doctrines of Sin and Freedom in Kierkegaard and Müller.’ In Stewart (2007b: 143–60).Google Scholar
Barrett, Lee (1984) ‘Sin and Self-Identity.’ Ph.D. dissertation, Yale.Google Scholar
Caswell, Matthew (2006). ‘The Value of Humanity and Kant's Conception of Evil’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44(4), 635–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, J.J. (2001) ‘The Meaning of Kierkegaard's Choice between the Aesthetic and the Ethical: A Response to MacIntyre’. In J.J. Davenport and Anthony Rudd (eds), Kierkegaard After MacIntyre (Chicago: Open Court), pp. 75–112.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Jamie (2008) ‘The Problematic Agapeistic Ideal – Again’. In E. F. Mooney (ed.), Ethics, Love, and Faith in Kierkegaard (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), pp. 93–110.Google Scholar
Firestone, C.L., Nathan, Jacobs (eds) (2008) In Defense of Kant's Religion. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul (2007) ‘Kant on the Radical Evil of Human Nature’. Philosophical Forum, 38(3), 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremstedal, Roe (2010) Kierkegaard and Kant on Anthropology and Religion. Trondheim: NTNU.Google Scholar
Frierson, P.R. (2003) Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R.M. (1992) Kierkegaard and Kant. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Green, R.M. (1998) ‘“Developing” Fear and Trembling’. In Alastair Hannay and Gordon Marino (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 257–281.Google Scholar
Grøn, Arne (1993) Begrepet Angst hos Søren Kierkegaard. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Grøn, Arne (1997) Subjektiviet og negativitet. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Hannay, Alastair (2003) Kierkegaard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, John (2002) The Moral Gap. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (2001a) Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. Allen Wood and George Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (2001b) Lectures on Ethics. Ed. Peter Heath and J.B. Schneewind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I (2009) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Günter Zöller and Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knappe, Ulrich (2004) Theory and Practice in Kant and Kierkegaard. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2006) Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslowski, Peter (2007) ‘Baader: The Centrality of Original Sin and the Difference of Immediacy and Innocence’. In Stewart (2007a: 1–16).Google Scholar
Lübcke, Poul (2006) ‘Kierkegaard's Concept of Revelation’. In G. Linde et al. (eds), Theologie zwischen Pragmatismus und Existenzdenken (Marburg: Elwert), pp. 405–414.Google Scholar
Marina, Jacqueline (1997) ‘Kant on Grace: A Reply to his Critics’. Religious Studies, 33, 379–400.Google Scholar
Morgan, Seiriol (2005) ‘The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity's Radical Evil in Kant's Religion’. Philosophical Review, 114(1), 63–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchnik, Pablo (2009) ‘An Alternative Proof of the Universal Propensity to Evil’, http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/ac385/Muchnik%20paper.doc (accessed May 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Philip (1990) ‘Does Anxiety Explain Original Sin?’, Noûs, 24, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Christoph (1991) Radikal böse. Fink: Munich.Google Scholar
Schultz, Henko (2007) ‘Rosenkranz: Traces of Hegelian Psychology and Theology in Kierkegaard’. In Stewart (2007b: 161–96).Google Scholar
Serck-Hanssen, Camilla (2005) ‘Radical Evil and Self Love in Kant's Theory of Agency’. In Åsa Carlson (ed.), Philosophical Aspects on Emotions (Stockholm: Thales), pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (ed.) (2007a) Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries: Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (ed.), (2007b). Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries: Theology. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.C. (1975) Kierkegaard's Pseudonymous Authorship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (1991) Kierkegaard's Critique of Reason and Society. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (1996) Becoming a Self. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue.Google Scholar
Wood, A.W. (1999) Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar