Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:42:41.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphysics as Kant’s Coquette: Rousseau’s Influence on Dreams of a Spirit-Seer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2015

Jeremiah Alberg
Jeremiah Alberg*
Affiliation:
International Christian University
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kant’s notes known as Remarks in the ‘Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime’ reveal a deep concern with the way in which the human drives to equality and unity lead inevitably to a drive for honour and its attendant delusions. He developed his thinking about these problems in the context of his reading of Rousseau. In his published Dreams of a Spirit-Seer, Kant tries to overcome the influence of the drive for honour by appealing to a metaphysics that is critical of itself. The problem is how to distinguish what is grounded in reason when that reason is so easily influenced by others.

Keywords

drive to equalitydrive to unitydrive to honourgeneral willcoquettemetaphysicsworldKantRousseauR. GirardDreams of a Spirit-Seer
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 347 - 371
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberg, Jeremiah (2007) A Reinterpretation of Rousseau: A Religious System. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberg, Jeremiah (2015) ‘What Dreams May Come: Kant’s Dreams of a Spirit-Seer Elucidated by Rousseau’. Kant-Studien, 106, 160–200.Google Scholar
Andriopoulos, Stefan (2011) ‘Kant’s Magic Lantern: Historical Epistemology and Media Archaeology’. Representations, 115, 42–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard (2008) ‘Überlegungen zur Umbruchsituation 1765–1766 in Kants philosophische Biographie’. Kant-Studien, 99, 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard (2012) ‘Kant as Rebel Against the Social Order’. In Susan Meld Shell and Richard Velkley (eds), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, James (1967) The Emergence of Philosophy of Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, René (1971) Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: The Self and Other in Literary Structure. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, René (1987) Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1963) ‘Über Kants früheste Ethik: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion’. Kant-Studien, 54, 404–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1965) ‘Über Kants Entwicklungsgeschichte’. Philosophische Rundschau, 13, 253–263.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1991) Bermerkungen in den «Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen». Ed. Marie Rischmüller. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992) ‘Dreams of a Spirit-Seer Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics’. Trans. David Walford and Ralf Meerbote. In David Walford and Ralf Meerbote (trans and eds), Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 301–359.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) ‘Kant’s Practical Philosophy: Herder’s Lecture Notes (Selections)’. Trans. Peter Heath. In Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind (eds), Lectures on Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999) Correspondence. Trans. and ed. Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011) ‘Remarks in the Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime’. In Patrick Frierson and Paul Guyer (trans and eds), Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 65–202.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2008) Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourciau, Sarah (2006) ‘Disarming the Double: Kant in Defense of Philosophy (1766)’. The Germanic Review, 81, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1959-95) CEuvres complètes, vols. 1–5. Ed. Bernard Gagnebin and Marcel Raymond. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1984) Diskurs über die Ungleichheit/Discours sur l’inégalité. Ed. Heinrich Meier. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1990) Rousseau, Judge of Jean-Jacques: Dialogues. Trans. and ed. Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1992) Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (Second Discourse). Trans. and ed. Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (2010) Emile or On Education. Trans. and ed. Christopher Kelly and Allan Bloom. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Schmucker, Josef (1961) Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflexionen. Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld (2009) Kant and the Limits of Autonomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld (2013) ‘Hobbes and Rousseau on the Origin of Human Malice’. In Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly, The Challenge of Rousseau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 271–291.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean (1988) Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard (1989) Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velkley, Richard (2002) Being After Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard (2013a) ‘The Measure of the Possible: Imagination in Rousseau’s Philosophical Pedagogy’. In Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly, The Challenge of Rousseau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 217–229.Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard (2013b) ‘Transcending Nature, Unifying Reason: On Kant’s Debt to Rousseau’. In Oliver Sensen (ed.), Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Zammito, John (2012) ‘The Pursuit of Science as Decadence in Kant’s Remarks in “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime”’. In Susan Meld Shell and Richard Velkley (eds), Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar