Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:21:22.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant and the Harmony of the Faculties: A Non-Cognitive Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2018

Apaar Kumar
Apaar Kumar*
Affiliation:
Manipal Centre for Philosophy and Humanities
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kant interpreters are divided on the question of whether determinate cognition plays a role in the harmony of the faculties in aesthetic judgement. I provide a ‘non-cognitive’ interpretation that allows Kant’s statements regarding judgements of natural beauty to cohere such that determinate cognition need not be taken to perform any role in such judgements. I argue that, in aesthetic harmony, judgement privileges the free activity of the imagination over the cognizing function of the understanding for the purpose of unifying the object, although the free imagination cannot violate the obscure concepts and principles of ordinary common sense.

Keywords

Natural beautyaesthetic judgementfree imaginationunderstandingcognition in generalharmony of the faculties
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry (2001) Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry (2003) ‘Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg’. Inquiry, 46, 182–194.Google Scholar
Bell, David (1987) ‘The Art of Judgement’. Mind, 96, 221–244.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm (2002) The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Essays on the Aesthetics of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm (2008) Aesthetic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël (2012) ‘Recent Approaches to Aesthetic Experience’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 70, 165–177.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul (1996) ‘The Significance of Kant’s Pure Aesthetic Judgment’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 36, 109–121.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul (2010) The Kantian Aesthetic: From Knowledge to the Avant Garde. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (1990) The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (1997) ‘Lawfulness without a Law’. Philosophical Topics, 25, 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2003) ‘Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure’. Inquiry, 46, 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997 [1979]) Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006a) Kant. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006b) ‘The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited’. In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 162–193.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2009) ‘The Harmony of the Faculties in Recent Books on the Critique of the Power of Judgment ’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 67, 201–221.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1992) ‘Kant’s Explanation of Aesthetic Judgment’. In Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Fiona (2007) Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Fiona (2010) Kant’s ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgement’. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalar, Brent (2006) The Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900–) Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. von der königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (1990) Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf (1982) ‘Reflection on Beauty’. In Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer (eds), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 55–86.Google Scholar
Petock, Stuart (1973) ‘Kant, Beauty and the Object of Taste’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32, 183–186.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Carl (2009) ‘Spectatorship’. In Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga (eds), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film (London: Routledge), pp. 249–259.Google Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth (2008) The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant’s Aesthetics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rush, Fred (2001) ‘The Harmony of the Faculties’. Kant-Studien, 92, 38–61.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert (2007) Kant on Judgement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2007) Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar