Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T19:20:56.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jeanine Grenberg, Kant's Defense of Common Moral Experience: A Phenomenological AccountCambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 Pp. x + 300 ISBN 9781107033580 (hbk) $99.00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2014

Martin Sticker
Martin Sticker*
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews and Stirling University email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , July 2014 , pp. 315 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grenberg only mentions Rousseau in a footnote (87).

2 Grenberg contrasts the Second Gallows Case with the most hardened scoundrel in Groundwork, 4: 454–5 (see especially ch.7). From these two cases ‘very different conclusions’ (178) can be drawn.

3 See for instance 4: 403, 4: 421–3, 5: 27, 5: 36, 5: 44, 5: 69.

4 This claim also does not sit well with certain passages in the second Critique in which Kant states that respect for the moral law has no epistemic function (5: 76. 16–23). Overall, textual evidence in the second Critique for the epistemic function of respect is, admittedly, ambiguous.