Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:13:36.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dreams of a Spirit-Seer and Kant’s Critical Method: Comments on Stephen R. Palmquist’s Kant and Mysticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

J. Colin McQuillan*
Affiliation:
St Mary’s University, San Antonio

Abstract

In his new book, Kant and Mysticism, Stephen Palmquist argues that Kant had already formulated his critical method by the mid-1760s and that it emerged from his reflections on Swedenborg’s mystical visions. In order to evaluate these claims, I consider Kant’s correspondence with Charlotte von Knobloch and Moses Mendelssohn before and after the publication of Dreams of a Spirit-Seer; the context in which Kant published Dreams; and the method he employs when he discusses Swedenborg’s visions in that work. I conclude that Kant’s critical method was not well-formed during the 1760s and did not emerge from Kant’s reflections on Swedenborg.

Type
Author Meets Critic
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kant, Immanuel (1999) Correspondence. Ed. and trans. Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992) Dreams of a Spirit-Seer Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics. In Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. Ed. and trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2019) Kant and Mysticism: Critique as the Experience of Baring All in Reason’s Light. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2000) Kant’s Critical Religion: Volume Two of Kant’s System of Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar