Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:36:38.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Kantian Emotions Feelings?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2021

Uri Eran
Uri Eran*
Affiliation:
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Alix Cohen, Kant defines emotions as ‘feelings’. Although I find her account of Kantian feelings compelling, I provide three reasons to doubt that it is an account of emotions: (1) it is unclear why Cohen identifies emotions with Kantian feelings; (2) some Kantian feelings are not emotions; (3) some Kantian desires may be emotions. I propose, however, that with some qualifications Cohen’s account may be upheld, provided its extra-textual assumptions about emotions are explicated. Against her claim that Kantian feelings have a derived intentionality, I argue that the text is compatible with their being intrinsically intentional.

Keywords

feelingsemotionspleasuredesiremoral psychologyAlix Cohen
Type
Article
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 371 - 378
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry E. (1998) ‘Pleasure and Harmony in Kant’s Theory of Taste’. In Herman, Parret (ed.), Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter), 466–83.Google Scholar
Byrne, Alex (2006) ‘Intentionality’. In Sahotra, Sarkar and Jessica, Pfeifer (eds), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia (London: Routledge), 406–10.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2020) ‘A Kantian Account of Emotions as Feelings’. Mind, 129, 429–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deimling, Wiebke (2014) ‘Kant’s Pragmatic Concept of Emotions’. In Alix, Cohen (ed.), Kant on Emotion and Value (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 108–25.Google Scholar
Deonna, Julien A., and Teroni, Fabrice (2015) ‘Emotions as Attitudes’. Dialectica, 69(3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick R. (2014) ‘Affective Normativity’. In Alix, Cohen (ed.), Kant on Emotion and Value (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 166–90.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997) Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, William (1884) ‘What is an Emotion?’ Mind, 9(2), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900–) Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (and predecessors), 29 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary, J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Lectures on Metaphysics. Trans. and ed. Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Paul, Guyer, trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Zöller, Günter and Robert, B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012) Lectures on Anthropology. Ed. Allen, W. Wood and Robert, B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg (2004) ‘Enough Already with “Theories of the Emotions”’. In Solomon, Robert C. (ed.), Thinking about Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions (New York: Oxford University Press), 269–78.Google Scholar
Scarantino, Andrea (2014) ‘The Motivational Theory of Emotions’. In Justin, D’Arms and Daniel, Jacobson (eds), Moral Psychology and Human Agency: Philosophical Essays on the Science of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 156–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar