Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-n7lw4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T04:43:24.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recurrent carbon labels induce bipartisan effects in environmental choices under risk – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2025

Zahra Rahmani Azad Open the ORCID record for Zahra Rahmani Azad [Opens in a new window] ,
Doron Cohen Open the ORCID record for Doron Cohen [Opens in a new window]  and
Ulf J. J. Hahnel Open the ORCID record for Ulf J. J. Hahnel [Opens in a new window]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

sustainable behaviorcarbon labelinginformation timingpolitical orientationdecisions from experienceclimate externalitiesattentional mechanismserratum
Type
Erratum
Information
Judgment and Decision Making , Volume 20 , 2025 , e18
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Judgment and Decision Making and European Association for Decision Making

This article contains an error in Table 2 which distorts the understanding of the authors’ research. This error was introduced during the production process and the publishers apologise. The correct version of Table 2 is printed below.

Table 2 Task design and aggregate results in Studies 1 and 2

Note: In Study 1, carbon neutral choices corresponded with Safe choices. For the Control condition in Study 1, Safe choice rates are displayed (since there were no emissions, there were no carbon neutral choices). In Study 2, carbon neutral choices corresponded with Safe choices in half of the rounds, and with Risky choices in the other half of rounds.

References

Rahmani Azad, Z., Cohen, D., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2025). Recurrent carbon labels induce bipartisan effects in environmental choices under risk. Judgment and Decision Making, 20, e12. doi:10.1017/jdm.2024.42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 2 Task design and aggregate results in Studies 1 and 2