Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:05:29.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scaling of mammalian long bones: small and large mammals compared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

Per Christiansen
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, Department for Historical Geology and Palaeontology, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K., Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] Present address: Zoological Museum, Universitets-Parken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Long bones from a taxonomically diverse assemblage of extant terrestrial mammals, spanning more than three orders of magnitude in body mass, have been measured in order to evaluate earlier models proposed for limb allometry as a means of physically coping with increased body size in large species. Linear regression models are unable to explain long bone scaling across a large size range of mammals, as differential scaling is present in large and small species and smaller species tend to approach geometric similarity to a considerably greater extent than larger species. Attempting to explain the morphology of the appendicular skeleton across the large size range of terrestrial Mammalia by means of a standard power function will probably inevitably lead to oversimplification, concealing underlying adaptations for coping with increased size. These include differences in limb posture, decrease in locomotory potential and greater duty factors during fast locomotion in large animals compared to anatomically similar smaller forms, and differential scaling of the appendicular skeleton in small and large mammals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)