Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:29:19.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitat segregation between sympatric Tibetan argali Ovis ammon hodgsoni and blue sheep Pseudois nayaur in the Indian Trans-Himalaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2003

Tsewang Namgail
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway Wildlife Institute of India, PO Box 18, Dehradun – 248 001, Uttaranchal, India
Joseph L. Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
Yash Veer Bhatnagar
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, PO Box 18, Dehradun – 248 001, Uttaranchal, India
Get access

Abstract

Tibetan argali Ovis ammon hodgsoni and blue sheep Pseudois nayaur have almost completely overlapping distributions encompassing most of the Tibetan plateau and its margins. Such a sympatric distribution of related species with similar ecological requirements implies that there is some degree of resource partitioning. This may be accomplished on the basis of habitat and/or diet separation. This study evaluated such ecological separation on the basis of physical habitat partitioning by these two sympatric ungulates in Hemis High Altitude National Park, Ladakh, India, in an area where the argali established a small new population in 1978. Such separation was tested for on the basis of expected difference between the species in their proximity to cliffs, associated with species-specific anti-predator behaviour. Tibetan argali selected habitats away from cliffs while blue sheep selected habitats close to cliffs. Blue sheep also selected steep slopes whereas argali selected gentle slopes. The two species did not differ in their use of habitats in terms of elevation. They did, however, differ in their use of plant communities; blue sheep selected sub-shrub and grass-dominated communities whilst argali selected forb-dominated communities. We suggest that the two species coexist in this site as a result of the differential use of habitat associated with their species-specific anti-predator strategies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)