Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:21:36.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measures of pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) burrow geometry: correlates of fractal dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2004

Stephanie S. Romañach
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-9610, U.S.A.
Steven C. Le Comber
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

For many burrowing species of mammals, the shape of the burrow may affect the success with which resources are acquired. Parameters used to characterize burrows have included: number of branches, mean segment length, turn angle, and linearity. However, the interactions among these parameters are unclear, making it desirable to find a single measure to characterize burrow geometry. For this reason, fractal dimension has been proposed as a measure of burrow geometry. However, the ways in which fractal dimension relates to other burrow metrics are not obvious. In this study, we examine correlations between fractal dimension and other measures of burrow geometry, using burrows of the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. We also investigate whether burrows excavated by pocket gophers of different age, sex, and at two locations differing in food abundance have different fractal dimensions. We show that there are strong correlations between fractal dimension and other measures of burrow geometry, but that replacing fractal dimension with any single measure of burrow geometry discards important information about burrow structure. We conclude that fractal dimension offers a useful way of describing burrow geometry. No differences were found in burrow fractal dimension between pocket gophers of different ages or sex or in sites of different productivities, and we conclude that the factors that determine the pattern of burrowing in this species are invariant with respect to these parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)