Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:53:15.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for female-biased dispersal in North American porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

R. A. Sweitzer
Affiliation:
Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512, U.S.A.
J. Berger
Affiliation:
Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Although sex biases in natal dispersal are well known among birds and mammals, female-biased dispersal in polygynous mammals is rare. North American porcupines are polygynous and recent evidence suggests that natal dispersal in this species may be female-biased. We used data on disappearances, immigration, and reproductive behaviours to characterize natal dispersal and examine the extent to which inbreeding avoidance may motivate natal dispersal in porcupines. We predicted that, if female porcupines were the predominant dispersers, rates of disappearance and immigration would be higher for females than for males. Also, if females disperse to avoid mating with fathers, then the mean age of females at first conception should be less than the mean residence time of adult males. Population data suggested that natal dispersal was female-biased because a higher proportion of females (31%) disappeared than males (11%), and 78% of 18 immigrants observed in the population were females. Data on pregnancies indicated that female age at first conception ([ape ]25 months) was less than the mean residence time of adult males ([ape ]26 months), suggesting that female porcupines may disperse to avoid incestuous matings with fathers. Little is known regarding potential resource competition between mothers and offspring, or on how philopatric males avoid mating with their mothers. Additional data are needed in these areas to interpret dispersal tendencies in porcupines.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)