Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:48:08.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Willingness to Pay for Wine Bullshit: Some New Estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

Kevin W. Capehart Open the ORCID record for Kevin W. Capehart [Opens in a new window]
Kevin W. Capehart*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, California State University, Fresno, 5245 N Backer Ave M/S PB20, Fresno, CA93740; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of a classic article in this journal, Richard Quandt identified 123 wine descriptors that he deemed to be bullshit. In this paper, I examine whether wine consumers are willing to pay any more (or less) for wine if it is described by one of those “bullshit” descriptors. I use three methods to examine that. The first method involves applying a hedonic regression to a dataset of prices and expert descriptions for about 50,000 wines. The second method involves applying a matching estimator to the same dataset. The third method involves a stated-preference survey of about 500 wine consumers. The three methods suggest that for most of the descriptors Quandt deemed to be bullshit, most consumers’ marginal willingness to pay for a descriptor is zero or near-zero. Yet, for some of the descriptors, some consumers do seem to have a non-zero marginal willingness to pay, perhaps because the descriptors shape a consumer's subjective experience or because they signal objective aspects of wine. (JEL Classifications: D12, D83, L66)

Keywords

expert evaluationhedonic regressionsmatching estimatorsstated preference
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 260 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Association of Wine Economists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank an anonymous reviewer and Karl Storchmann, the editor of the journal, for comments and useful suggestions. I am also indebted to the participants at the 2018 Annual American Association of Wine Economists Conference for a productive discussion of this project.

References

Aqueveque, C. (2018). Ignorant experts and erudite novices: Exploring the Dunning-Kruger effect in wine consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 65(April), 181–184.10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, R. (2017). Dimensions of expertise in wine evaluation. Journal of Wine Economics, 12(1), 59–83.10.1017/jwe.2016.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, J., Katumullage, D., Yang, C., and Cao, J. (2021). Classification of wines using principal component analysis. Journal of Wine Economics, 16(1), 56–67.10.1017/jwe.2020.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, F., O'Neill, K., Quehl, K., and Lottridge, D. (2020). Exploring the quality, efficiency, and representative nature of responses across multiple survey panels. Proceedings of the 2020 Association for Computing Machinery's Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3313831.3376671.Google Scholar
Chen, K. J., and McCluskey, J. (2018). Impacts of expert information on prices for an experience good across product segments: Tasting notes and wine prices. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 43(3), 388–402.Google Scholar
The Economist. (2011). Describing wine: Don't let's whine. March 3. Available at https://www.economist.com/johnson/2011/03/03/dont-lets-whine (accessed March 3, 2011).Google Scholar
Ginsburgh, V. (2016). On judging art and wine. In Rizzo, I. and Towse, R. (eds.), The Artful Economist: A New Look at Cultural Economics, 245–265. Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. S. (2019). Half-blind tasting: A deception-free method for sizing placebo and nocebo responses to price and packaging attributes. Journal of Wine Economics, 14(3), 321–331.10.1017/jwe.2019.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, N., Colombo, S., Kriström, B., and Watson, F. (2009). Accounting for negative, zero and positive willingness to pay for landscape change in a national park. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 1–16.10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00180.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefford, A. (2015). Tasting notes: The shame of the wine world? Decanter, August 31. Available at https://www.decanter.com/wine-news/opinion/jefford-on-monday/jefford-on-monday-tasting-notes-the-shame-of-the-wine-world-272488/ (accessed August 31, 2015).Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (1981). Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review, 71(4), 801.Google Scholar
Krumme, C. (2011). Velvety chocolate with a silky ruby finish, pair with shellfish. Slate, February 23. Available at http://www.slate.com/articles/life/drink/2011/02/velvety_chocolate_with_a_silky_ruby_finish_pair_with_shellfish.html (accessed February 23, 2011).Google Scholar
Malone, T., and Lusk, J. L. (2019). Mitigating choice overload: An experiment in the US beer market. Journal of Wine Economics, 14(1), 48–70.10.1017/jwe.2018.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, D. (2015). Seeking the Veritas about the Vino: Fine wine ratings as wine knowledge. Journal of Wine Research, 26(4), 319–335.10.1080/09571264.2015.1083953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCannon, B. C. (2020). Wine descriptions provide information: A text analysis. Journal of Wine Economics, 15(1), 71–94.10.1017/jwe.2020.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozer, R., Miratrix, L., Kaufman, A. R., and Anastasopoulos, L. J. (2020). Matching with text data: An experimental evaluation of methods for matching documents and of measuring match quality. Political Analysis, 28(2), 445–468.10.1017/pan.2020.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski, E., and Pawsey, N. (2019). Community and expert wine ratings and prices. Economic Papers, 38(1), 27–40.Google Scholar
Outreville, J. F., and Le Fur, E. (2020). Hedonic price functions and wine price determinants: A review of empirical research. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 18(2): doi:10.1515/jafio-2019–0028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, J., and Hu, W. (2019). Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual hypothetical bias: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96(July), 22–35.10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quandt, R. (2007). On wine bullshit: Some new software? Journal of Wine Economics, 2(2), 129–135.10.1017/S1931436100000389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, C. D. (2010). Do tasting notes add value? Evidence from Napa wines. Journal of Wine Economics, 5(1), 143–163.10.1017/S1931436100001425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, J. (2009). Does advertising bias product reviews? An analysis of wine ratings. Journal of Wine Economics, 4(2), 125–151.10.1017/S1931436100000766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchmann, K. (2012). Wine economics. Journal of Wine Economics, 7(1), 1–33.10.1017/jwe.2012.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Garderen, K. J., and Shah, C. (2002). Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Econometrics Journal, 5(1), 149–159.10.1111/1368-423X.00078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, R. L. (2007). Debunking critics’ wine words: Can amateurs distinguish the smell of asphalt from the taste of cherries? Journal of Wine Economics, 2(2), 136–144.10.1017/S1931436100000390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wine Advocate (2020). Glossary terms. Available at https://www.robertparker.com/resources/glossary-terms (accessed July 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Young, A. M. (2015). The politics of wine and the style of bullshit. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45(5), 472–476.10.1080/02773945.2015.1088344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Capehart supplementary material

Capehart supplementary material

Download Capehart supplementary material(File)
File 95.9 KB