Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:36:36.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Within-habitat heterogeneity of euglossine bee populations: a re-evaluation of the evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2002

Athayde Tonhasca Jr
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ 28015-620, Brasil
Jacquelyn L. Blackmer
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ 28015-620, Brasil Current address: USDA-ARS, 4135 E. Broadway Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA
Gilberto S. Albuquerque
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ 28015-620, Brasil

Abstract

Euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) are considered keystone species in the neotropics because of their role as pollinators of several plant species, particularly orchids (Dodson et al.1969, Roubik 1992). Pollination by male euglossine bees occurs when they visit flowers to collect fragrances, which may be used for courtship (Eltz et al. 1999) or attraction of other males and females (Peruquetti 2000). Synthetic products that mimic those fragrances have been used frequently in studies of euglossine bee ecology and population structure (Armbruster & McCormick 1990, Powell & Powell 1987, Roubik & Ackerman 1987). The ability of euglossine bees to disperse and find isolated flowers and distant baits (Dressler 1968, Janzen 1971) has led Janzen (1981) and Janzen et al. (1982) to suggest that bees attracted to fragrances come from a wide area that may include different habitats. According to this hypothesis, individuals collected at baiting stations are part of the same pool of bees. However, Armbruster (1993) found significant variation in the number of bees collected at nearby baiting stations, and he considered these differences as demonstration of within-habitat heterogeneity of the euglossine bee community. In Armbruster's model, results of bait collections are strongly affected by the concentration of resources in ‘hot spots’, therefore a sampling station would not necessarily represent the habitat, but only particular microhabitats.

Type
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)