Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:46:42.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trophic structure of bat communities in the understorey of lowland dipterocarp rain forest in Malaysia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Charles M. Francis
Charles M. Francis
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bat communities in the understorey of primary lowland dipterocarp forest in peninsular Malaysia and Sabah were sampled with mist nets and harp traps to estimate their trophic structure. Overall, 4 of 26 species (15%) at one site, and 6 of 33 species (18%) at the other site were frugivores, while the remainder were insectivores. In terms of individuals, 7–12% of all captures were frugivores. However, the true proportion of frugivores at both sites was probably closer to 1%, because the sampling procedures were strongly biased towards frugivores. In contrast, previously published studies indicate that frugivores comprise 34–48% of species, and up to 80% of individuals in bat communities in the understorey of Neotropical forest. These results support the hypothesis, developed from studies of bird communities, that the under-storey of Malaysian dipterocarp forest supports relatively few obligate frugivores, at least in non-masting years. However, further data are required on bats in the canopy, and on the foraging ranges of bats to compare the absolute densities of bats in Malaysian and Neotropical forests.

Keywords

batsChiropteracommunity ecologydipterocarp forestMalaysiarain foresttrophic structure
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , November 1990 , pp. 421 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Bonaccorso, F. J. 1979. Foraging and reproductive ecology in a Panamanian bat community. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences 24:359–408.Google Scholar
Dubost, G. 1987. Une analyse écologique de deux faunes de mammifères forestiers tropicaux. Mammalia 51:415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, C. 1989. Bird community structure in two rainforests: Africa (Gabon) and South America (French Guiana) - a comparison. Pp. 89–122 in Harmelin-Vivien, M. L. & Bourlière, F. (eds). Vertebrates in complex tropical systems. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Find Ley, J. S. & Wilson, D. E. 1983. Are bats rare in tropical Africa? Biotropica 15:299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1973. Numbers of mammal species in North and Central American forest communities. Ecology 54:555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1979. Do tropical frugivores compete for food?American Zoologist 19:1157–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1986. The structure of Neotropical bat communities: a preliminary analysis. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 59:135–150.Google Scholar
Fleming, T. H., Breitwisch, R. & Whitesides, G. H. 1987. Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugi-vore diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H., Hooper, E. T. & Wilson, E. E. 1972. Three Central American bat communities: structure, reproductive cycles, and movement patterns. Ecology 53:555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. E. D. 1973. A handbook to Kabili-Sepilok Forest Reserve. Sabah Forest Record No. 9. Borneo Literature Bureau, Kuching.Google Scholar
Francis, C. M. 1989. A comparison of mist nets and two designs of harp traps for capturing bats. Journal of Mammalogy 70:865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, B. H. 1984. Flying fruit-bat faunas of the upper canopy in two palaeotropical rain forests. P. 303 in Chadwick, A. C. & Sutton, S. L. (eds). Tropical forest: the Leeds Symposium. Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, Leeds.Google Scholar
Heideman, P. D. & Heaney, L. R. 1989. Population biology and estimates of abundance of fruit bats (Pteropodidae) in Philippine submontane rainforest. Journal of Zoology, London 218:565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, C. O. Jr 1967. Bats of the canopy of an Amazonian forest. Atas do Simposio sobre a Biota Amazonica 5:211–215.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1980. Heterogeneity of potential food abundance for tropical small land birds. Pp. 545–552 in Keast, A. & Morton, E. S. (eds). Migrant birds in the Neotropics: ecology, behavior, distribution, and conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Karr, J. R. 1980. Geographical variation in the avifaunas of tropical forest undergrowth. Auk 97:283–298.Google Scholar
Kemper, C. 1988. The mammals of Pasoh Forest Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 42:1–19.Google Scholar
Laval, R. K. & Fitch, H. S. 1977. Structure, movements and reproduction in three Costa Rican bat communities. Occasional Papers Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas. 69:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekagul, B. & McNeely, J. A. 1977. Mammals of Thailand. Association for the Conservation of Wildlife, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Medway, L. 1982. The wild mammals of Malaya (peninsular Malaysia) and Singapore. (2nd edition, revised). Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
Palmeirim, J. M., Gorchov, D. L. & Stoleson, S. 1989. Trophic structure of a neotropical frugivore community: is there competition between birds and bats? Oecologia 79:403–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, J. & Francis, C. M. 1985. A field guide to the mammals of Borneo. Sabah Society, Kota Kinabalu.Google Scholar
Richards, G. C. 1983. Tube-nosed insectivorous bat. P. 364 in Strahan, R. (ed.). The Australian Museum complete book of Australian mammals. Angus & Robertson, Sydney. 530 pp.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. & Robinson, S. 1986. Guilds and their utility in ecology. Pp. 65–90 in Kikkawa, J. & Anderson, D. J. (eds). Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Melbourne. 432 pp.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. W. & Laval, R. K. 1988. Survey and census methods. Pp. 77–89 in Kunz, T. H.Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Tidemann, C. R. & Woodside, D. P. 1978. A collapsible bat trap and a comparison of results obtained with the trap and with mist-nets. Australian Wildlife Research 5:355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, M. D. 1974. An improved trap for bats. Journal of Mammalogy 55:475–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, D. R. 1988. Comparative evolution of Afro-Asian equatorial-forest avifaunas. Acta XIX Con-gressus International Omithologici 2799–2809.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1984. Tropical rain forests of the Far East. (2nd edition). Clarendon Press, Oxford. 352 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E. 1973. Bat faunas: a trophic comparison. Systematic Zoology 22:14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, M. 1986. Trophic organization of understory birds in a Malaysian dipterocarp forest. Auk 103: 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zborowski, P. 1981–1982. Bat trapping at Sepilok. Sabah Society Journal 7:77–80.Google Scholar