Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:22:26.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Topographic variation and stand heterogeneity in a wet evergreen forest of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2003

Audrey Robert
Affiliation:
‘Gestion de la biodiversité’ (EA 3156), Université de Nice- Sophia Antipolis, Parc Valrose, 06 108 Nice cedex 2, France
Marie-Agnès Moravie
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

We investigated the links between slope variation and heterogeneity in tree growth and stand structure. The study was conducted in an undisturbed wet evergreen forest in India. We selected three plots situated on gentle slopes and three plots situated on steep slopes. Tree growth was considered as mean annual diameter increment. Stand structure was considered in relation to several characteristics: trunk diameter distributions, tree heights, and spatial distributions of stems and crowns. Except for the spatial structure, analyses were performed on samples including either all the species or only the dominant species (Vateria indica L.). Diameter growth varied according to slope intensity and to tree size: growth of large trees was clearly higher on steep slopes whereas growth of small trees proved lower or similar. Diameter distributions were different among the six plots, but the difference cannot be related to slope intensity. On the contrary, tree heights differed according to slope intensity: for a given diameter, trees were taller on gentle slopes than on steep slopes. Finally, stem spatial distributions showed strong regularity on gentle slopes whereas they were random on steep slopes. The observed changes between gentle and steep slopes suggest differences at tree level through a modification of its shape, but also differences in the major processes responsible for stand dynamics: competition, establishment and survival.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)