Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T04:55:07.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal influences on ungulate movement within a fenced South African reserve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2018

Christopher A.J. O'Kane  and
David W. Macdonald
Christopher A.J. O'Kane*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Oxon OX13 5QL, UK
David W. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Oxon OX13 5QL, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The movement of African ungulates between habitats is determined by diverse factors including forage composition, availability and quality, water availability, topography, the catenary level and the effect of fire on vegetation. We assessed how grass flushes, following dry-season fires, and availability of water influenced seasonal movements of hartebeest, impala, warthog, white rhino, wildebeest and zebra in Ithala Game Reserve, a fenced reserve in South Africa. Over a 6-d period each month for 4 y, road transects covering a representative sample of the reserve's different vegetation types, and 23% of the reserve's total area, were carried out. We recorded the species, number, sex and age class of herbivores, obtaining 8742 records (total herbivores sighted = 47055), and obtained positional data on sightings over the last 2 y of the study. Using a GIS-based approach, we determined that ruminant, but not non-ruminants, were significantly attracted to dry-season grass flushes, and that presence or absence of such flushes significantly affected their mean distance to water and hence seasonal movements on the catena.

Keywords

body-sizeburnsgrazershartebeestimpalasavannawarthogwildebeestzebra
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 200 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BELL, R. 1969. The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. Pp. 111–124 in Watson, A. (ed.). Animal populations in relation to their food resources. Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
BEN-SHAHAR, R. & COE, M. J. 1992. The relationship between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behavour of wildebeest and zebra. Oecologia 90:422–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRODY, S., PROCTOR, R. C. & ASHWORTH, U. S. 1934. Growth and development with special reference to domestic animals, Part 34. Research Bulletin University of Missouri Agricultural Research Experiment Station 220:32.Google Scholar
BROOKS, P. M. 1985. Classification of large herbivores in Ithala Game Reserve. Natal Parks Board, Pietermaritzburg. 18 pp.Google Scholar
CROWE, T. M., SCHIJF, J. C. & GUBB, A. A. 1981. Effects of rainfall variation, fire, vegetation and habitat physiognomy on a northern Cape animal community. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 11:87–104.Google Scholar
FERRAR, A. A. & WALKER, B. H. 1974. An analysis of herbivore-habitat relationships in Kyle National park, Rhodesia. Journal of the South African Wildlife Management Association 4:137–147.Google Scholar
FIELD, C. R. & LAWS, R. M. 1970. The distribution of the larger herbivores in the Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Journal of Applied Ecology 7:273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRAND, T. C. 2002. Alternative forms of competition and predation dramatically affect habitat selection under foraging-predation-risk trade-offs. Behavioural Ecology 13:280–290.Google Scholar
GUREJA, N. & OWEN-SMITH, N. 2002. Comparative use of burnt grassland by rare antelope species in a lowveld game ranch, South Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 32:31–38.Google Scholar
HIRST, S. M. 1975. Ungulate-habitat relationships in a South African woodland/savanna ecosystem. Wildlife Monographs 44: 3–60.Google Scholar
HUNGATE, R. E., PHILLIPS, G. D., MCGREGOR, A., HUNGATE, D. P. & BUECHNER, H. K. 1959. Microbial fermentation in certain animals. Science 130:1192–1194.Google Scholar
HUNTLEY, B. J. & WALKER, B. H. 1982. Ecology of tropical savannas. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 669 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILLIUS, A. W. & GORDON, I. J. 1992. Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores – evolution of body size and competitive interactions. Oecologia 89:428–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MCDONALD, P., EDWARDS, R. A. & GREENHALGH, J. F. D. 1966. Animal nutrition. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 407 pp.Google Scholar
MOE, S. R., WEGGE, P. & KAPELA, E. B. 1990. The influence of man-made fires on large wild herbivores in Lake Burungi area in Northern Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 28:35–43.Google Scholar
O'KANE, C. A. J., PAGE, B. & MACDONALD, D. W. 2014a. Differing influences of resource availability on the demographics and habitat selection of wildebeest compared to impala. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30:189–198.Google Scholar
O'KANE, C. A. J., PAGE, B. & MACDONALD, D. W. 2014b. Conducting animal censuses amongst abrupt topography; a GIS-based alternative to Distance. Austral Ecology 39:848–854.Google Scholar
OWEN-SMITH, N. & NOVELLIE, P. 1982. What should a clever ungulate eat? American Naturalist 119:151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REDFERN, J. V., GRANT, R., BIGGS, H. & GETZ, W. M. 2003. Surface-water constraints on herbivore foraging in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecology 84:2092–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHOLES, R. J. & WALKER, B. H. 1982. An African savanna. Synthesis of the Nylsvlei study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 318 pp.Google Scholar
SHACKLETON, C. M. 1992. Area and species selection by wild ungulates in coastal sour grasslands of Mkambati Game Reserve, Transkei, southern Africa. African Journal of Ecology 30:189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STURM, H. J. 1993. Auswirkung von Feuer- und Beweidungsausschluß auf die Produktion der Krautschicht einer Strauchsavanne. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 22:323–328.Google Scholar
TALBOT, L. M. & TALBOT, M. H. 1963. The wildebeest in Western Masailand, East Africa. Wildlife Monographs 12:1–88.Google Scholar
TOMOR, B. M. & OWEN-SMITH, N. 2002. Comparative use of grass regrowth following burns by four ungulate species in the Nylsvley Nature Reserve, South Africa. African Journal of Ecology 40: 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILMSHURST, J. F., FRYXELL, J. M., FARM, B. P., SINCLAIR, A. R. E. & HENSCHEL, C. P. 1999. Spatial distribution of Serengeti wildebeest in relation to resources. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77: 1223–1232.Google Scholar
WILSEY, B. J. 1996. Variation in use of green flushes following burns among African ungulate species: the importance of body size. African Journal of Ecology 34:32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRONSKI, T. 2003. Fire induced changes in the foraging behaviour of impala Aepyceros melampus in the Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 41:56–60.Google Scholar