Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:54:08.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproduction in the toad Colostethus trinitatus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in a northern Venezuela seasonal environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

María José Praderio
Affiliation:
Departamento de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela
Michael D. Robinson
Affiliation:
Departamento de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela

Abstract

Various aspects of the reproductive biology of a montane population of Colostethus trinitatus were quantified during the transition from a prolonged dry season to a wet season with abnormally low rainfall. One-third to three-quarters of the females collected in the dry period (March to June) had mature ovarian follicles. The proportion of ovigerous females did not increase in July or August when the number of rainy days was greater. However, breed-ing and egg laying were only observed in the latter season. The principal environmental change that stimulated oviposition was frequent daily rain which increased humidity in the terrestrial nest sites.

Pair formation, nests, and males carrying larvae are reliable criteria that indicate the breeding period of Colostethus trinitatus. The average number of mature ovules (>2 mm) was greater in the wet season (=13.1) than during the dry months (= 11.3). Female standard length and the number of yolked follicles was positively correlated. Five nests contained an average of 13.6 eggs, and males carried only slightly fewer larvae (= 11.5). One female and one individual of unknown sex were found with eggs at two different nests. Five nests were unattended.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Crump, M. L. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas No. 61:468.Google Scholar
Dole, J. W. & Durant, P. 1974. Courtship behavior in Colostethus collaris (Dendrobatidae). Copeia 1974:988990.Google Scholar
Duellman, W. E. 1979. The herpetofauna of the Andes: patterns of distribution, origin, differentia-tion, and present communities. Pp. 371–459 in Duellman, W. E. (ed.). The South American Herpeto-fauna: its origin, evolution, and dispersal. Monographs of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas No. 7:1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duellman, W. E. & Trueb, L. 1986. Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.670 pp.Google Scholar
Durant, P. & Dole, J. 1975. Aggressive behavior in Colostethus (=Prostherapis) collaris (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Herpetologica 31:2326.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. R. 1971. Taxonomic notes on South American dendrobatid frogs of the genus Colos–tethus. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas No. 30:114.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. R. 1974. A phenetic analysis of the genus Colostethus (Anura:Dendrobatidae). Doctoral Thesis of the University of Kansas. 419 pp.Google Scholar
Gosner, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae, with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183190.Google Scholar
Kenny, J. S. 1969. The amphibia of Trinidad. Studies on the fauna of Curacao and other Caribbean islands. Vol. 24. Martinus Nijoff, The Hague. 78 pp.Google Scholar
Praderio, M. J. 1985. Aspectos ecológicos de una poblacion de Colostethus herminae (Dendrobatidae) en la Quebradade La Guairita, Estado Miranda. Licenciado Thesis, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas. 151 pp. and appendices.Google Scholar
Rivero, J. A. 1961. Salientia of Venezuela. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 126:1207.Google Scholar
Rivero, J. A. 1978. Notas sobre los anfibios de Venezuela. II. Sobre los Colostethus de los Andes venezolanos. Memorias de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle, 35:327344. (1974).Google Scholar
Rivero, J. A. 1980. Notas sobre los anfibios de Venezuela. III. Nuevos Colosethus de los Andes vene-zolanos. Memorias de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle, 38:95111. (1978).Google Scholar
Rivero, J. A. 1984. Una nueva especie de Colostethus (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae) de la Cordillera de la Costa, con anotaciones sobre otros Colostethus de Venezuela. Brenesia 22:5156.Google Scholar
Salthe, S. N. & Mecham, J. A. 1973. Reproduction and courtship patterns. Pp. 301–521 in Lofts, B. (ed.). Physiology of the Amphibia. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Savage, J. M. 1968. The dendrobatid frogs of Central America. Copeia 1968:745776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, O. J. 1960. Some aspects of the behavior and of the territory of a dendrobatid frog. Pros-therapis trinitatis. Ecology 41:107115.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rolhf, F. J. 1969. Biometria. H. Blume Ediciones, Madrid. 832 pp.Google Scholar
Test, F. H. 1954. Social aggressiveness in an amphibian. Science 120:140141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Test, F. H. 1956. Two new dendrobatid frogs from northern Venezuela. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of Michigan No. 577:19.Google Scholar
Vareschi, V. 1968. Sabanas del Valle de Caracas. Pp. 19–119 in Estudio de Caracas, Ecologia Vegetal y Fauna. Volume 1. Ediciones de la Biblioteca de la Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas. 466 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, K. D. 1980a. Social behavior and communication of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus trinitatus). Herpetologica 36:189199.Google Scholar
Wells, K. D. 1980b. Behavioral ecology and social organization of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus inguinalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 6:199209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar