Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:24:25.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantification of four different post-dispersal seed deposition patterns after dung beetle activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2017

R. F. Braga ,
R. Carvalho ,
E. Andresen ,
D. V. Anjos ,
E. Alves-Silva  and
J. Louzada
R. F. Braga
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Invertebrados, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG. Brazil Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Divinópolis, MG. Brazil
R. Carvalho*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos Sociais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG. Brazil
E. Andresen
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán. Mexico
D. V. Anjos
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós Graduação em Entomologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP. Brazil
E. Alves-Silva
Affiliation:
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Nova Xavantina, MT. Brazil
J. Louzada
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Invertebrados, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG. Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Primary seed dispersal of many rain-forest seeds occurs through defecation by mammals. Dung beetles are attracted to the defecations and through their dung-processing behaviour these insects change the initial pattern of seed deposition. Final seed deposition patterns, i.e. where and how seeds are deposited after dung beetle activity has taken place, may strongly depend on seed size. In this study we addressed the following question: Do different sizes of seeds have different deposition patterns following dung beetle processing? We conducted a field experiment in lowland Amazonian rain forest in Brazil using 200-g dung-piles containing seed mimics of three sizes: 3.5, 8.6 and 15.5 mm long. Seed deposition condition after dung beetle activity was dependent on seed size. Small seeds were more often buried in beetle tunnels, while medium and large seeds more often remained on the soil surface, either clean or still covered by dung. A low proportion of seeds of all sizes remained on the soil surface covered by loose soil excavated by dung beetles. We speculate that the latter deposition pattern, though not very frequent, might be highly favourable for both seed survival and seedling establishment.

Keywords

biotic interactionsecological functionpost-dispersal seed fateScarabaeinaesecondary seed dispersal
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 407 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ANDRESEN, E. 1999. Seed dispersal by monkeys and the fate of dispersed seeds in a Peruvian rain forest. Biotropica 31:145–158.Google Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2001. Effects of dung presence, dung amount and secondary dispersal by dung beetles on the fate of Micropholis guyanensis (Sapotaceae) seeds in Central Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17:61–78.Google Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. 2002. Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rain forest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecological Entomology 27:257–270.Google Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. & FEER, F. 2005. The role of dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers and their effect on plant regeneration in tropical rainforests. Pp. 331–349 in Forget, P. M., Lambert, J. E., Hulme, P. E. & Vander Wall, S. B. (eds). Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI, Wallingford.Google Scholar
ANDRESEN, E. & LEVEY, D. J. 2004. Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologia 139:45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRAGA, R. F., KORASAKI, V., ANDRESEN, E. & LOUZADA, J. 2013. Dung beetle community and functions along a habitat–disturbance gradient in the Amazon: a rapid assessment of ecological functions associated to biodiversity. PLoS ONE 8 (2):e57786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHAMBERS, J. C. & MACMAHON, J. A. 1994. A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 25:263–292.Google Scholar
ESTRADA, A. & COATES-ESTRADA, R. 1991. Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) and seed dispersal: ecological interactions in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7:459–474.Google Scholar
FEER, F. 1999. Effects of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) on seeds dispersed by howler monkeys (Aloutta seniculus) in the French Guianan rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:129–142.Google Scholar
GARDNER, T. A., FERREIRA, J., BARLOW, J., LEES, A. C., PARRY, L., VIEIRA, I. C. G., BERENGUER, E., ABRAMOVAY, R., ALEIXO, A., ANDRETTI, C., ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C., ARAÚJO, I., ÁVILA, W. S., BARDGETT, R. D., BATISTELLA, M., BEGOTTI, R. A., BELDINI, T., DE BLAS, D. E., BRAGA, R. F., BRAGA, D. L., BRITO, J. G., CAMARGO, P. B., SANTOS, F. C., OLIVEIRA, V. C., CORDEIRO, A. C. N., CARDOSO, T. M., CARVALHO, D. R., CASTELANI, S. A., CHAUL, J. C. M., CERRI, C. E., COSTA, F. A., COSTA, C. D. F., COUDEL, E., COUTINHO, A. C., CUNHA, D., D'ANTONA, A., DEZINCOURT, J., DIAS-SILVA, K., DURIGAN, M., ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M., FERES, J., FERRAZ, S. F. B., FERREIRA, A. E. M., FIORINI, A. C., SILVA, L. V. F., FRAZÃO, F. S., GARRETT, R., GOMES, A. S., GONÇALVES, K. S., GUERRERO, J. B., HAMADA, N., HUGHES, R. M., IGLIORI, D. C., JESUS, E. C., JUEN, L., JUNIOR, M., OLIVEIRA-JUNIOR, J. M. B., OLIVEIRA-JUNIOR, R. C., SOUZA-JUNIOR, C., KAUFMANN, P., KORASAKI, V., LEAL, C. G., LEITÃO, R., LIMA, N., ALMEIDA, M. F. L., LOURIVAL, R., LOUZADA, J., MAC NALLY, R., MARCHAND, S., MAUÉS, M. M., MOREIRA, F. M. S., MORSELLO, C., MOURA, N., NESSIMIAN, J., NUNES, S., OLIVEIRA, V. H. F., PARDINI, R., PEREIRA, H. C., POMPEU, P. S., RIBAS, C. R., ROSSETTI, F., SCHMIDT, F. A., SILVA, R., R. C. SILVA, V. M., SILVA, T. F.M.R., SILVEIRA, J., SIQUEIRA, J. V., CARVALHO, T. S., SOLAR, R. R. C., TANCREDI, N. S. H., THOMSON, J. R., TORRES, P. C., VAZ-DE-MELLO, F. Z., VEIGA, R. C. S., VENTURIERI, A., VIANA, C., WEINHOLD, D., ZANETTI, R. & ZUANON, J. 2013. A social and ecological assessment of tropical land uses at multiple scales: the Sustainable Amazon Network. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 368: 20120166.Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, H. M., BARDGETT, R. D., LOUZADA, J. & BARLOW, J. 2016. The value of trophic interactions for ecosystem function: dung beetle communities influence seed burial and seedling recruitment in tropical forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 283:20161634.Google Scholar
HARPER, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London. 892 pp.Google Scholar
JONES, M. B. 1994. Secondary seed removal by ants, beetles, and rodents in a Neotropical moist forest. Thesis, M. S.. University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
LAWSON, C. R., MANN, D. J. & LEWIS, O. T. 2012. Dung beetles reduce clustering of tropical tree seedlings. Biotropica 44:271– 275.Google Scholar
POUVELLE, S., JOUARD, S., FEER, F., TULLY, T. & PONGE, J.-F. 2009. The latrine effect: impact of howler monkeys on the distribution of small seeds in a tropical rain-forest soil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25:239–248.Google Scholar
RÍOS, R. & PACHECO, L. F. 2006. The effect of dung and dispersal on postdispersal seed predation of Attalea phalerata (Arecaceae) by bruchid beetles. Biotropica 38:778–781.Google Scholar
SANTOS-HEREDIA, C. & ANDRESEN, E. 2014. Upward movement of buried seeds: another ecological role of dung beetles promoting seedling establishment. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30:409–417.Google Scholar
SHEPHERD, V. E. & CHAPMAN, C. A. 1998. Dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers: impact on seed predation and germination. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14:199–215.Google Scholar
VANDER WALL, S. B. & LONGLAND, W. S. 2004. Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:155–161.Google Scholar