Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:17:13.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenological patterns of Ficus in relation to other forest trees in southern India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Aviva Patel
Aviva Patel*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 249118, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA
*
1Ecosystem Health, Blackwood Hall, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaN1G 2W1. Fax: (519)763–1686, Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of figs as keystone resources depends partly on their year-round fruiting pattern. However, most non-equatorial fig species show seasonality in reproductive phenology. If fig and other species' fruiting peaks coincide, the importance of figs as key resources during lean fruiting periods may be reduced. Fig and other forest tree phenology was studied in a deciduous and an evergreen site in the Western Ghats, southern India, from January 1991 to May 1992. In the deciduous site, most non-fig flowering and leaf flushing occurred during the two dry seasons, while most fruiting occurred during the dry and early wet seasons. In the evergreen site, all non-fig tree phenological stages – flowering, fruiting and leaf flushing – were concentrated during the two dry seasons annually (dry and post-monsoon). Individual fig trees produced crops one to three times annually, at different times of the year for different trees. Fig community fruiting peaks in the evergreen site coincided with fruiting peaks of the other forest trees, but in the deciduous site occurred slightly offset from non-fig fruiting peaks. The role of figs as key resources is likely to differ among forests, and to depend on factors such as diversity of fruiting pattern among fig species, fig tree density and territoriality of frugivores.

Keywords

figfloweringfruitingfrugivorykeystone resourceMoraceaephenologytropics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , September 1997 , pp. 681 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Alvim, P. de T. 1964. Tree growth and periodicity in tropical climates. Pp. 479–495 in Zimmermann, M. H. (ed.). The formation of wood in forest trees. Academic Press, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augspurger, C. K. 1981. Reproductive synchrony of tropical plants: experimental effects of pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology 62:775–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baijnath, H. & Ramcharun, S. 1983. Aspects of pollination and floral development in Ficus capensis Thunb. (Moraceae). Bothalia 14:883–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baijnath, H. & Ramcharun, S. 1988. Reproductive biology and chalcid symbiosis in Ficus burtt-davyi (Moraceae). Monographs in Systematic Botany Missouri Botanical Garden 25:227–235.Google Scholar
Bawa, K. S. 1983. Patterns of flowering in tropical plants. Pp. 394–410 in Jones, C. E. & Little, R. J. (eds). Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Berg, C. C. 1989. Classification and distribution of Ficus. Experientia 45:605–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, R. 1980. Phenology and ecophysiology of tropical trees: Erythrina poeppigiana O. F. Cook. Ecology 61:1065–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, R. M. 1993. Figs, Malabar giant squirrels, and fruit shortages within two tropical Indian forests. Biotropica 25:183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronstein, J. L. 1989. A mutualism at the edge of its range. Experientia 45:622–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronstein, J. L. & Hoffmann, K. 1987. Spatial and temporal variation in frugivory at a Neotropical fig, Ficus pertusa. Oikos 49:261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronstein, J. L. & Patel, A. 1992. Causes and consequences of within-tree phenological patterns in the Florida strangling fig, Ficus aurea (Moraceae). American Journal of Botany 79:41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, W. C. 1974. Flowering periodicity at four altitudinal levels in eastern Ethiopia. Biotropica 6:38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, R. T. 1987. The phenology of Ficus fatulosa in Singapore. Biotropica 19:122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, R. T. 1990. Flora and reproductive biology of the rain forest at Bukit Timah, Singapore. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, R. T. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in the reproductive phenology of Ficus grossularioides Burm. f. in Singapore. Malayan Nature Journal 46:149–155.Google Scholar
Croat, T. B. 1975. Phenological behavior of habit and habitat classes on Barro Colorado Island (Panama Canal Zone). Biotropica 7:270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogden, M. P. L. 1972. The seasonality and population dynamics of equatorial forest birds in Sarawak. Ibis 114:307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R. B. 1982. The seasonal rhythm of fruitfall on Barro Colorado Island. Pp. 151–172 in Leigh, E. G., Rand, A. S. & Windsor, D. M. (eds). The ecology of a tropical forest. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
Frankie, G. W., Baker, H. G. & Opler, O. A. 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests of lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 62:881–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretwell, S. D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Galil, J. 1990. Adjustment of development spans in organisms participating in fig symbioses. Pp. 433–440 in Proceedings of the Twelfth Plenary Meeting of AETFAT, Hamburg, West Germany.Google Scholar
Galil, J. & Eisikowitch, D. 1968. Flowering cycles and fruit types of Ficus sycomorus in Israel. New Phytologist 67:745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier-Hion, A. & Michaloud, G. 1989. Are figs always keystone resources for tropical frugivorous vertebrates? A test in Gabon. Ecology 70:1826–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. S. 1967. Figs of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. 154 pp.Google Scholar
Hladik, C. M., Hladik, A., Bousset, J., Valdebouze, P., Viroben, G. & Delort-Laval, J. 1971. Le regime alimentaire des primates de l'Ile Barro-Colorado (Panama). Folia Primatologica 16:85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1967. Synchronization of sexual reproduction of trees within the dry season in Central America. Evolution 21:620–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kannan, R. In press. Fruiting phenology and the conservation of the great pied hornbill Buceros bicornis in the Western Ghats of southern India. Biotropica.Google Scholar
Kerdelhue, C. & Rasplus, J.-Y. 1996. The evolution of dioecy among Ficus (Moraceae): an alternate hypothesis involving non-pollinating fig wasp pressure on the fig-pollinator mutualism. Oikos 77:163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshava Murthy, K. R. & Yoganarasimhan, S. N. 1990. Flora of Coorg. Vimsat Publishers, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
Kinnaird, M. F., O'Brien, T. G. & Suryadi, S. 1996. Population fluctuation in Sulawesi red-knobbed hornbills: tracking figs in space and time. Auk 113:431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, F. & Maurice, S. 1989. Seasonality in the reproductive phenology of Ficus: its evolution and consequences. Experientia 45:653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelmeyer, K. O. 1959. The periodicity of leaf change and flowering in the principal forest communities of Ceylon. Ceylon Forester 4:308–364.Google Scholar
Lambert, F. R. & Marshall, A. G. 1991. Keystone characteristics of bird-dispersed Ficus in a Malaysian lowland rain forest. Journal of Ecology 79:793–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, M. & Leighton, D. R. 1983. Vertebrate responses to fruiting seasonality within a Bornean rain forest. Pp. 181–196 in Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. C. & Chadwick, A. C. (eds). Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Levin, D. A. & Anderson, W. W. 1970. Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. American Naturalist 104:455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, D. 1982. Seasonality and phenology in a dry tropical forest in Ghana. Journal of Ecology 70:791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medway, Lord. 1972. Phenology of a tropical rain forest in Malaya. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 4:117–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. H. 1963. Seasonal activity and ecology of the avifauna of an American equatorial cloud forest. University of California Publications in Zoology 66:1–78.Google Scholar
Milton, K. & Dintzis, F. R. 1981. Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for tropical plant samples. Biotropica 13:177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K., Windsor, D. M., Morrison, D. W. & Estribi, M. A. 1982. Fruiting phenologies of two Neotropical Ficus species. Ecology 63:752–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murali, K. S. & Sukumar, R. 1994. Reproductive phenology of a tropical dry forest in Mudumalai, southern India. Journal of Ecology 82:759–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negi, Y. S., Rawat, M. S. M., Pant-Joshi, G. & Badoni, S. 1992. Biochemical investigation of fruits of some common Ficus species. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technologie 25:582–584.Google Scholar
Newton, L. E. & Lomo, A. 1979. The pollination of Ficus vogelii in Ghana. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 78:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A. 1996. Variation in a mutualism: phenology and the maintenance of gynodioecy in two Indian fig species. Journal of Ecology 84:667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A., Hossaert-Mckey, M. & Mckey, D. 1993. Ficus-pollinator research in India: past, present and future. Current Science 65:243–253.Google Scholar
Putz, F. E. 1979. Aseasonality in Malaysian tree phenology. Malaysian Forester 42:1–24.Google Scholar
Reich, P. B. & Borchert, R. 1982. Phenology and ecophysiology of the tropical tree Tabebuia neochrysantha (Bignoniaceae). Ecology 63:294–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldanha, C. J. 1984. Flora of Karnataka. Volume I. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India. 535 pp.Google Scholar
Snow, D. W. 1965. A possible selective factor in the evolution of fruiting seasons in tropical forest. Oikos 15:274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somaiah, K. K. 1959. Working plan for a portion of the eastern deciduous forests of Coorg. Government of Mysore, Bangalore.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1986. Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest. Pp. 330–344 in Soulé, M. E. (ed.). Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Thirumurthi, N. 1954. Working plan for the evergreen forest of Coorg. Government of Mysore, Bangalore.Google Scholar
Van Schaik, C. P. 1986. Phenological changes in a Sumatran rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2:327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkerke, W. 1989. Structure and function of the fig. Experientia 45:612–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, N. M. 1979. Pollinator availability as a determinant of flowering time in Ocotillo (Fourquieria splendens). Oecologia 39:107–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, R. A., Tilson, J. W. & Tilson, R. L. 1980. Asynchrony in a wild population of Ficus sycomorus. South African Journal of Science 76:478–480.Google Scholar
White, L. J. T. 1994. Patterns of fruit-fall phenology in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10:289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor, D. M., Morrison, D. W., Estribi, M. A. & De Leon, B. 1989. Phenology of fruit and leaf production by ‘strangler’ figs on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Experientia 45:647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, R. W., Conkun, N. L., Etot, G., Obua, J., Hunt, K. D., Hauser, M. D. & Clark, A. P. 1993. The value of figs to chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology 14:243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar