Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:41:53.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2005

Leonardo Maffei
Affiliation:
Capitanía del Alto y Bajo Isoso, Casilla 3800, Santa Cruz, Bolivia Wildlife Conservation Society-Bolivia, Casilla 6272, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
Andrew J. Noss
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society-Bolivia, Casilla 6272, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
Erika Cuéllar
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society-Bolivia, Casilla 6272, Santa Cruz, Bolivia
Damián I. Rumiz
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society-Bolivia, Casilla 6272, Santa Cruz, Bolivia Museo de Historia Natural Noel Kempff Mercado, Santa Cruz, Bolivia

Abstract

In comparison with the Neotropical big cats, jaguar (Panthera onca L.) and puma (Felis concolor L.), medium and small felids are poorly studied. Furthermore, studying wild felids in forest habitats is extremely difficult using direct methods given that most species are principally nocturnal and secretive (Gittleman 1996). Indirect methods are therefore particularly important, e.g. radio-telemetry (Emmons 1987, 1988; Konecny 1989, Ludlow & Sunquist 1987) or camera trapping (Maffei et al. 2002, Trolle & Kéry 2003). Using systematic camera trap surveys, we compare the population density of ocelots (Felis pardalis L.) across five Bolivian dry-forest sites with different habitat types and/or annual rainfall regimes (Table 1). We hypothesize that ocelot densities will decline as rainfall declines. In addition, we estimate the population of ocelots in the 34 400-km2 Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco National Park. Finally, we describe and evaluate additional ecological information provided by camera trapping: activity patterns relative to seasonality and moon phase, sex ratios, ranging patterns and relative abundance compared with sympatric felids.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)