Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:39:22.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Large-vertebrate assemblages of primary and secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2007

Luke Parry
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), EMBRAPA, Trav. Dr. Enéas Pinheiro, S/N, Belém, -Pará, Brazil; CEP 66.095-100
Jos Barlow
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Carlos A. Peres
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

Abstract

Secondary forests account for 40% of all tropical forests yet little is known regarding their suitability as habitat for diurnal large mammals and game birds. This is especially so for second-growth that develops on large areas of degraded land. We address this by investigating assemblages of large-bodied birds and mammals in extensive patches of secondary forest in the Jarí region of the north-eastern Brazilian Amazon, comparing species richness and abundance against that of adjacent undisturbed primary forests. We conducted 184 km of line-transect censuses over a period of 3 mo, and found that although primary and secondary forests held a similar abundance of large vertebrates, the species composition was very different. Secondary forests supported a high abundance of ungulate browsers (0.85 vs 0.44 indiv. per 10 km) and smaller-bodied primates (15.6 vs 4.6 indiv. per 10 km) compared with primary forests. However, large prehensile-tailed primates were absent (black spider monkey Ateles paniscus) or at very low abundance (Guyanan red howler monkey Alouatta macconelli) in secondary forest. The abundance of large frugivorous/granivorous birds was also low in secondary forests compared with primary forests (22.6 vs 37.1 individuals per 10 km, respectively). Faunal assemblages appear to reflect food resource availability. Concurrent vegetation surveys indicated that secondary forests had high levels of terrestrial and understorey browse. Fruit production was largely restricted to pioneer trees such as Bellucia and Inga spp. Although these regenerating forests were an important habitat for large mammals and birds, they were limited in terms of faunal richness, particularly dispersers of large-seeded plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)