Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:03:35.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitat associations of woodcreeper (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae) assemblage in selectively logged areas of Southern Amazonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Domingos J. Rodrigues*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade. Av. Fernando Correa da Costa, Nº 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, CEP: 78060–900 - Cuiabá – MT, Brazil Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Humanas e Sociais. Av. Alexandre Ferronato, 1200, Bairro Setor Industrial, CEP: 78557–267- Sinop, MTBrazil National Institute of Science and Technology for Amazonia Biodiversity (INCT – CENBAM)
Fernando P. Florêncio
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade. Av. Fernando Correa da Costa, Nº 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, CEP: 78060–900 - Cuiabá – MT, Brazil
Jocieli Oliveira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade. Av. Fernando Correa da Costa, Nº 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, CEP: 78060–900 - Cuiabá – MT, Brazil
Dalci M. M. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Departmento de Biologia, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa, nº 2367. Bairro Boa Esperança, CEP: 78060–900. Cuiabá – MT, Brazil National Institute of Science and Technology for Amazonia Biodiversity (INCT – CENBAM)
Gregory W. Lollback
Affiliation:
Environmental Futures Research Institute, School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, 4222Australia
Jean-Marc Hero
Affiliation:
Environmental Futures Research Institute, School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, 4222Australia
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] or [email protected]

Abstract:

The Brazilian Amazon rain forest has lost c. 17% of its originally forested portion, due to deforestation and selective logging. Forest degradation caused by logging contributes to loss of animal species that require specialized habitats to survive, such as woodcreepers that inhabit understorey areas. Habitat associations of woodcreeper species can be important for identifying species that have restricted distribution and/or habitat specialization. Our study investigates the effects of spatial variation in forest structure and some landscape features (canopy openness, altitude, distance to stream and exploited basal area) on the abundance and composition of woodcreeper assemblage in selectively logged tropical forests in Southern Amazonia. We used mist-nets and points count to quantify the composition and abundance of woodcreepers in 32 plots in three sites. Plots were spatially arranged in PPBio LTER sites (long-term ecological research plots, systematically spaced at 1-km intervals) in Southern Amazonia. A total of 240 individuals (captured, observed and/or heard) belonging to 11 woodcreeper species were detected. Mantel tests showed that there is no spatial autocorrelation among woodcreeper assemblage and distance between plots. Altitude and canopy openness were significantly associated with the composition of the woodcreeper assemblage. Altitude was negatively associated with species richness, and the abundance of the two dominant species (Glyphorynchus spirurus and Xiphorhynchus elegans). The negative relationship with canopy openness suggests that woodcreeper assemblages that inhabit understorey are likely to be indirectly affected by selective logging which reduces canopy cover. The selective logging indirectly changes bird species assemblages, and depending on the intensity, may result in the local extinction of some insectivorous species. Short- and long-term studies addressing different intensities of selective logging are needed to determine the impacts on the bird species and forest structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ALEIXO, A. 1999. Effects of selective logging on a bird community in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Condor 101:537548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANTONGIOVANNI, M. & METZGER, J. P. 2005. Influence of matrix habitats on the occurrence of insectivorous bird species in Amazonian forest fragments. Biological Conservation 122:441451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AZEVEDO-RAMOS, C., CARVALHO, O. & AMARAL, B. D. 2006. Short-term effects of reduced-impact logging on eastern Amazon fauna. Forest Ecology and Management 232:2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASNER, G. P., KNAPP, D. E., BROADBENT, E. N., OLIVEIRA, P. J. C., KELLER, M. & SILVA, J. N. 2005. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 80:480482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BANKS-LEITE, C. & CINTRA, R. 2008. The heterogeneity of Amazonian treefall gaps and bird community composition. Ecotropica 14:113.Google Scholar
BARLOW, J., PERES, C., HENRIQUES, L., STOUFFER, P. & WUNDERLE, J. 2006. The responses of undestorey birds to forest fragmentation, logging and wildfires: an Amazonian synthesis. Biological Conservation 128:182192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARROS, O. G. & CINTRA, R. 2009. The effects of forest structure on occurrence and abundance of three owl species (Aves: Strigidae) in the Central Amazon forest. Zoologia 26:8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIERREGAARD, R. O. & LOVEJOY, T. E. 1989. Effects of forest fragmentation on Amazonian understory bird communities. Acta Amazonica 19:215241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLAKE, J. G. 2007. Neotropical Forest bird communities: a comparison of species richness and composition at local and regional scales. Condor 109:237255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUENO, A. S., BRUNO, R. S., PIMENTEL, T. P., SANAIOTTI, T. M. & MAGNUSSON, W. E. 2012. The width of riparian habitats for understory birds in an Amazonian forest. Ecological Applications 22:722734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARVALHO, M. A. 2006. Composição e história natural de uma comunidade de serpentes em área de transição Amazônia-Cerrado, ecorregião florestas secas de Mato Grosso, município de Claudia, Mato Grosso, Brasil. PhD Dissertation, Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar
CINTRA, R. & NAKA, L. N. 2012. Spatial variation in bird community composition in relation to topographic gradient and forest heterogeneity in a Central Amazonian rainforest. International Journal of Ecology 2012:125.Google Scholar
CINTRA, R., MARUOKA, A. E. & NAKA, L. N. 2006. Abundance of two Dendrocincla Woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae) in relation to forest structure in Central Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 36:209220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COHN-HAFT, M., WHITTAKER, A. & STOUFFER, P. C. 1997. A new look at the “species-poor” Amazon: the avifauna north of Manaus, Brazil Central. Ornithological Monographs 48:205235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSTA, F. R. C. & MAGNUSSON, W. E. 2010. The need for large-scale, integrated studies of biodiversity – the experience of the Program for Biodiversity Research in Brazilian Amazonia. Natureza e Conservação 8:312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSTA, F. R. C., SENNA, C. & NAKKAZONO, E. M. 2002. Effects of selective logging on populations of two tropical understory herbs in an Amazonian forest. Biotropica 34:289296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMBRAPA. 1997. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. (Second edition). EMBRAPA–CNPS, Rio de Janeiro. 212 pp.Google Scholar
FEARNSIDE, P. M. 2005. Desmatamento na Amazônia brasileira: história, índices e conseqüências. Megadiversidade 1:113123.Google Scholar
FERREIRA, L. V., LEMOS, R. M., BUSCHBACHER, N. R., BATMANIAM, G., SILVA, J. M. C. M., ARRUDA, B., MORETTI, E., , L. F. S. N., FALCOMER, J. & BAMPI, M. I. 2001. Identificação de áreas prioritárias para a conservação da biodiversidade por meio da representatividade das ucnidades de Conservação e tipos de vegetação nas ecorregiões da Amazônia brasileira. Pp. 268286 in Capobianco, J. P. R. (ed.). Biodiversidade na Amazônia brasileira: Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a conservação, uso sustentável e repartição de benefícios. Instituto Socioambiental, São Paulo.Google Scholar
GAUCH, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 295 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRAY, M. A., BALDAUF, S. L., MAYHEW, P. J. & HILL, J. K. 2007. The response of avian feeding guilds to tropical forest disturbance. Conservation Biology 21:133141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GUILHERME, E. & CINTRA, R. 2001. Effects of intensity and age of selective logging and tree girdling on an understory bird community composition in Central Amazonia, Brazil. Ecotropica 7:7792.Google Scholar
HENRIQUES, L. M. P., WUNDERLE, J. M., OREN, D. C. & WILLIG, M. R. 2008. Efeitos da exploração madeireira de baixo impacto sobre uma comunidade de aves de sub-bosque na floresta Nacional do Tapajós, Pará, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 38:267290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLMES, T. P., BLATE, G. M., ZWEEDE, J. C., PEREIRA, R., BARRETO, P., BOLTZ, F. & BAUCH, R. 2002. Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 163:93110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JAYAPAL, R., QURESHI, Q. & CHELLAM, R. 2009. Importance of forest structure versus floristics to composition of avian assemblages in tropical deciduous forests of Central Highlands, India. Forest Ecology and Management 257, 22872295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNS, A. D. 1991. Responses of Amazonian rain forest birds to habitat modification. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7:417437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARTAWINATA, K., RISWAN, S., GINTINGS, A. N. & PUSPITOJATI, T. 2001. An overview of post-extraction secondary forests in Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 13:621638.Google Scholar
KÖPPEN, W. 1936. Das geographisca system der klimate. Pp. 144 in Köppen, W. & Geiger, G. (eds.). Handbuch der Klimatologie. Volume 1, Part C. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
LAMBERT, F. R. 1992. The consequences of selective logging for Bornean lowland forest birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 335:443457.Google Scholar
LAURANCE, S. G. W. 2004. Responses of understory rain forest birds to road edges in Central Amazonia. Ecological Applications 14:13441357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEES, A. C. & PERES, C. A. 2008. Conservation value of remnant riparian forest corridors of varying quality for Amazonian birds and mammals. Conservation Biology 22:439449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LEGENDRE, P. & LEGENDRE, L. 2012. Numeral ecology. (Third edition). Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. 990 pp.Google Scholar
MAGNUSSON, W. E., LIMA, A. P., LUIZÃO, R., LUIZÃO, F., COSTA, F. R. C., CASTILHO, C. V. & KINUPP, V. F. 2005. RAPELD: uma modificação do método de Gentry para inventários de biodiversidade em sítios para pesquisa ecológica de longa duração. Biota Neotropica 2:16.Google Scholar
MAGNUSSON, W., BRAGA-NETO, R., PEZZINI, F., BACCARO, F., BERGALLO, H., PENHA, J., RODRIGUES, D., VERDADE, L. M., LIMA, A., ALBERNAZ, A. L., HERO, J-M., LAWSON, B., CASTILHO, C., DRUCKER, D., FRANKLIN, E., MENDONÇA, F., COSTA, F., GALDINO, G., CASTLEY, G., ZUANON, J., VALE, J., SANTOS, J. L. C., LUIZÃO, R., CINTRA, R., BARBOSA, R. I., LISBOA, A., KOBLITZ, R. V., CUNHA, C. N. & PONTES, A. R. M. 2013. Biodiversity and integrated environmental monitoring. Áttema Editorial. Santo André. 351 pp.Google Scholar
MARANTZ, C. A., ALEIXO, A., BEVIER, L. R. & PATTEN, M. A. 2003. Family Dendrocolaptidae (Woodcreepers). Pp. 358448 in Del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Christie, D. (eds.). Handbook of the birds of the world. Broadbills to Tapaculos. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.Google Scholar
MARTINS, S. C. 2010. Caracterização dos solos e serapilheira ao longo do gradiente altitudinal da Mata Atlântica, estado de São Paulo. PhD Dissertation, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura da Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP.Google Scholar
NOVAES, F. C. & LIMA, M. F. C. 1991. As aves do Rio Peixoto de Azevedo, Mato Grosso. Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 7:351381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NUR, N. V., BALLARD, G. & GEUPEL, G. R. 2008. Regional analysis of riparian bird species response to vegetation and local habitat features. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:840855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OLANDER, L. P., BUSTAMANTE, M. M., ASNER, G. P., TELLES, E., PRADO, Z. & CAMARGO, P. B. 2005. Surface soil changes following selective logging in an Eastern Amazon forest. Earth Interact 9:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OLIVEIRA, D. M. M., NOVACK, L., FLORÊNCIO, F. P., ASSUMPÇÃO, I. C., SILVEIRA, R. M. L., ALMEIDA, E. C. & WEISS, B. 2011. Aves da fazenda São Nicolau, Cotriguaçu – Mato Grosso: diversidade, endemismo e conservação. Pp. 171202 in Rodrigues, D. J., Izzo, T. J. & Battirola, L. D. (eds.). Descobrindo a Amazônia Meridional: Biodiversidade da fazenda São Nicolau. Pau e prosa comunicação, Cuiabá.Google Scholar
OWIUNJI, I. & PLUMPTRE, A. J. 1998. Bird communities in logged and unlogged compartments in Budongo forest, Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management 108:115126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PALMER, G. C. & BENNETT, A. F. 2006. Riparian zones provide for distinct bird assemblages in forest mosaics of south-east Australia. Biological Conservation 130:447457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PEEL, M. C., FINLAYSON, B. L. & MCMAHON, T. A. 2007. Updated world map of the Koppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrology Earth System Sciences 11:16331644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUIG, H. 2008. A floresta tropical úmida. Editora UNESP, São Paulo. 496 pp.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, L. A. & COLEY, P. D. 2007. Seasonal and habitat differences affect the impact of food and predation on herbivores: a comparison between gaps and understory of a tropical forest. Oikos 116:3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBINSON, S. & TERBORGH, J. 1995. Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian. Ecology 64:111.Google Scholar
ROOS, A. L. 2010. Capturando aves. Pp. 79104 in Matter, S. V., Straube, F. C., Accordi, I., Piacentini, V. & Cândido, J. F. (eds.). Ornitologia e conservação: ciência aplicada, técnicas de pesquisa e levantamento. (First edition). Editora Technical Books, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
SANTOS, A. J. 2006. Estimativas de riqueza em espécies. Pp. 1941 in Cullen, L., Rudran, R. & Padua, C. V. (eds.). Métodos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. (Second edition). Editora Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.Google Scholar
SEKERCIOGLU, C. H., DAILY, G. C. & EHRLICH, P. R. 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:1804218047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SODHI, N. S., SOH, M. C. K., DEWI, M., DARJONO, P. & BROOK, B. W. 2005. Persistence of lowland rainforest birds in a recently logged area in central Java. Bird Conservation International 15:173191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STOUFFER, P. C. & BIERREGAARD, R. O. 1995. Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology 76:24292445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THIOLLAY, J. 1992. Influence of selective logging on bird species diversity in a Guianan rain forest. Conservation Biology 6:4763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOURLITIS, G. L., PRIANTE-FILHO, N., HAYASHI, M. M. S., NOGUEIRA, J. S., CASEIRO, F. T. & CAMPELO, J. H. 2002. Seasonal variations in the evapotranspiration of the transitional tropical forest, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Water Resource Research 38:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOODCOCK, P., EDWARDS, D. P., NEWTON, R. J., KHEN, C. V., BOTTRELL, S. H. & HAMER, K. C. 2013. Impacts of intensive logging on the trophic organisation of ant communities in a biodiversity hotspot. PLoS ONE 8 (4): e60756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZIMMER, K. J., PARKER, T. A., ISLER, M. L. & ISLER, P. R. 1997. Survey of a southern Amazonian avifauna: the Alta Floresta region, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Ornithological Monographs 48:887918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar