Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:34:26.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foliar characteristics of neotropical forest affect assemblages structure of parasitoid insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2024

Brandon Lara-Cetina
Affiliation:
División de estudios de posgrado e Investigación, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Conkal, Mexico
Horacio Ballina-Gómez
Affiliation:
División de estudios de posgrado e Investigación, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Conkal, Mexico
Santiago Bordera
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Jorge Leirana-Alcocer
Affiliation:
Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México
Alejandra González-Moreno*
Affiliation:
División de estudios de posgrado e Investigación, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Conkal, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: Alejandra González-Moreno; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several authors suggest that greater vegetation complexity provides more shelters, supporting higher parasitoid diversity. Additionally, it serves as visual cue in host searching. This study evaluates how visual stimuli and herbivore-induced vegetation changes affect parasitoid strategies and guilds in low deciduous forest [Yabucu], and Medium Semi-Evergreen forest [Noh-Bec]. We calculated the relative abundance of idiobiont and koinobiont life strategies for each vegetation type and constructed the range-abundance curves of these communities. Also, the relationship of guilds with the different types of damage from herbivory and leaf characteristics were described. The koinobiont:idiobiont (K:I) ratio was 6:1 (86.65% koinobionts and 13.35% idiobionts) in Yabucú and 1:2 (32.78% koinobionts and 67.22% idiobionts) in Noh-Bec. Some guilds were associated with vegetation: a negative correlation between fluctuating asymmetry seedlings (FAS) and parasitoids attacking larvae into the fruiting bodies of fungi was founded; the FAS is an indirect indicator of herbivory, nonetheless, the parasitoids found do not target phytophagous hosts, which makes an inverse relationship plausible and could potentially reduce intra-guild competition. Hyperparasitoids were positively associated with holes in adult plants (HA); with an association with herbivore parasitoids, which could be contributing to the recorded evidence of holes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Tecnológico Nacional de México/ Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Parasitoids are insects that grow inside or on the body of another arthropod, usually of phytophagous habits (Godfray Reference Godfray1994). Parasitoids follow two types of development strategies. The idiobiont strategy consists of inserting the ovipositor into the host body and injecting a poison that can paralyze, arrest its development, or kill it, and then lay an egg on its body so that the larva can feed on the host when it emerges. In the koinobiont strategy, the parasitoid allows the host to continue developing and growing after oviposition (Askew & Shaw Reference Askew, Shaw, Waage and Greathead1986).

In both strategies, parasitoids have developed highly efficient search strategies and make decisions during the search for hosts at three levels (Cournoyer & Boivin Reference Cournoyer and Boivin2004). First, they decide where to look for a host; second, where to focus their search; and, third, whether or not to lay an egg on/in the host once they have found it (Ueno & Ueno Reference Ueno and Ueno2015). The first level involves the search for a vegetation patch within a landscape at great distances, responding both to volatile compounds emitted by plants and to visual signals derived from vegetation structure and composition of the habitat and the changes induced by the host in them (Sime Reference Sime2004, Giunti et al. Reference Giunti, Canale, Messing, Donati, Stefanini, Michaud and Benelli2015). The second level consists of locating chemical and visual signals emitted by plants that have been attacked by herbivores (Castelo et al. Reference Castelo, van Nouhuys and Corley2010, Sime Reference Sime2004).

In the third level, once the host is located, parasitoids use their antennas and ovipositor to assess whether the host is suitable for egg-laying, feeding, or both (Hughes et al. Reference Hughes, Harvey and Hubbard1994). The structural complexity of the vegetation influences the search for both the patch and the host, regardless of the plant species richness (Zhang & Adams Reference Zhang and Adams2011). Some authors postulate that the greater the structural complexity of the vegetation, the higher the number of shelters available, which will allow to harbor a higher parasitoid diversity (Fraser et al. Reference Fraser, Dytham and Mayhew2007, Hawkins Reference Hawkins1988, Hawkins & Lawton Reference Hawkins and Lawton1987, Hawkins et al. Reference Hawkins, Shaw and Askew1992, Sääksjärvi et al. Reference Sääksjärvi, Ruokolainen, Tuomisto, Haataja, Fine, Cárdenas and Vargas2006). However, other authors claim that the volatile chemicals induced by herbivores feeding on different plant species can attract different species of parasitoids (Godfray Reference Godfray1994). Hence, structural complexity does not affect parasitoid diversity; instead, plant species composition is more important (Godfray Reference Godfray1994, Koricheva et al. Reference Koricheva, Mulder, Schmid, Joshi and Huss-Danell2000).

Considering this controversy and the little knowledge about the vegetation factors that might be influencing the first two parasitoid search levels, this work aims to determine the effect of vegetation structure on development strategies and guilds of the family Ichneumonidae that make up parasitoid communities in two types of tropical forest of the Yucatan Peninsula. To this end, we assessed the visual stimuli and changes in herbivore-induced vegetation structural characteristics and their effect on the biological composition of parasitoid communities in different vegetation types in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.

Materials and methods

Study area

We selected two sites of the Yucatan Peninsula corresponding to two different vegetation types. The first site, called Yabucú (latitude 20.810° and longitude −89.413°), is a Private Reserve located in the municipality of Acanceh, Yucatan, with altitudes between 0 m and 100 m a.s.l. It has a warm subhumid climate with summer rains. The annual temperature ranges between 26ºC and 28°C, and the annual precipitation ranges from 1000 mm to 1100 mm. The site includes areas or patches of low deciduous forest (LDF) and secondary vegetation of different successional ages ranging from 5, 8, 10, 15, and 20 years (Flores-Guido & Espejel-Carvajal, Reference Flores-Guido and Espejel-Carvajal1994).

The other site, called Noh Bec (latitude 19.143056° and longitude −88.169167°), is located in the center of Quintana Roo State in the municipality of Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. It is part of the corridor linking the Sian ka´an and Calakmul Biosphere Reserves. It comprises a territory of 24,122 hectares with patches of Medium Semi-Evergreen Forest (MSEF) and an area of Permanent Forest Area of 18 thousand hectares for logging.

In addition, it includes an Ejidal Forest Reserve called El Huasteco, comprising an area of 700 hectares for wildlife protection and conservation. Noh Bec is a forest community organized in three major sectors: the Noh Bec Ejido that manages forest resources; Noh Bec S.P.R. (Productos de Bosques Tropicales Certificados Noh Bec, S.P.R. de R.L.), a major stake-holder in industrial development, and the Noh Bec Gum Cooperative, in charge of gum collection.

Field sampling of parasitoids

Ichneumonids were sampled using Malaise traps, which are extensively used in parasitoid monitoring programs (Fraser et al. Reference Fraser, Dytham and Mayhew2007, Chan-Canché et al. Reference Chan-Canché, Ballina-Gómez, Leirana-Alcocer, Bordera and González-Moreno2020). In each of the two sites (LDF, MSEF), ten traps were placed in the center of the vegetation patch, forming a square with the traps placed at a regular distance from each other. These traps operated uninterruptedly during five months (June–October) in the rainy season, with collecting jars replaced every 15 days.

The samples collected in the field were sent to the Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, where specimens were sorted according to taxonomic groups, mounted and identified taxonomically for a correct characterization of the parasitoid guilds.

Guilds’ definition

Parasitoid species were classified in the following guilds (Mazón and Bordera Reference Mazón and Bordera2014):

gPh, those attacking exposed phytophagous larvae feeding on external parts of plants, such as leaves, stems, flowers, and buds.

Sap, parasitoids of saprophagous larvae.

Hyp, hyperparasitoids, whose host range includes many species of primary parasitoids.

Coc, parasitoids of cocoons and pupae.

Myc, parasitoids of larvae found in the fruiting bodies of mushrooms and bracket fungi.

Xyl, parasitoids of xylophagous larvae, excluding those feeding on dead but not decomposing wood.

Mel, parasitoids of melitophagous larvae of bees that feed on stores of honeydew, nectar, and pollen, and of wasp larvae living in nests.

Poly, parasitoids whose host range includes two or more arthropod orders with different trophic habits.

Zoo, parasitoids of zoophagous larvae and spiders.

Unkn, parasitoids whose hosts are unknown.

Vegetation sampling

Ten circles of 10 meters in radius (20 m diameter) were delimited in each vegetation type, considering the Malaise trap as the center; each circle was divided into four identical sections (Figure 1). One such section was selected for manual leaf collection (sampling one-quarter of the circle per month until completing the circle at the end of the sampling, and then alternating the direction of each quarter to cover the four cardinal points). Ten leaves were collected from each individual plant, considering the following criteria: for plants with a height <1.5 m (including seedlings), five leaves were collected from the outer part of the canopy and five from the inner part (three leaves in the case of seedlings).

Figure 1. Diagram indicating the vegetation sampling area (filled in green). The red spot corresponding to Malaise trap.

Herbivory and leaf characteristics

The types of foliar herbivory were determined (Table 1) according to the methodology proposed by Crawley (Reference Crawley1983), as well as the frequency of each type by leaf and by collection circle (Malaise). Besides, the leaf characteristics of each plant were measured (differentiating between adults and seedlings): hardness and thickness, side length, fluctuating asymmetry, total leaf area, and missing leaf area, using the ImageJ software. The environmental variables relative humidity and temperature were measured in each collection circle during the five months of sampling.

Table 1. Types of foliar herbivory (Crawley Reference Crawley1983)

Data analysis

We described the Ichneumonidae assemblages in each vegetation type, determining the composition of guilds and the proportion of development strategies (koinobiont and idiobiont). The community structure was described by constructing rank-abundance curves and development strategies of guild communities (also known as Whittaker curves) were constructed (Magurran Reference Magurran2004).

The influence of vegetation structure on development strategies (regulating the way in which guild assemblages interact) was established by determining the visual signals derived from vegetation structure (frequency of damage by herbivory of potential hosts) that influence the establishment of populations of this family of parasitoid wasps.

Partial linear correlation analyses were performed using the PAST statistical software (Hammer et al. Reference Hammer, Harper and Ryan2001), to determine whether there are significant relationships between leaf characteristics, type of herbivory damage, and the biological composition of ichneumonid assemblages (guilds) in the two vegetation types. Significant correlations (P < 0.05) among parasitoid guild abundance are given in the form of a correlation matrix, while significant correlations between guild abundances and all the other variables are represented as correlation networks. Guilds with less than 20 individuals were not used for the analysis.

Results

Development strategies and composition of ichneumonid assemblages

A total of 1699 individuals belonging to 168 morpho-species of the family Ichneumonidae were collected, of which 59.86% are parasitoids with a koinobiont strategy (1017 individuals) and 40.14% with a idiobiont strategy (682 individuals) (Table 2). We found differences by site in the koinobionts/idiobionts (K:I) ratio: LDF showed a 6:1 ratio, 746 koinobionts (86.65%) and 114 idiobionts (13.35%), while MSEF displayed a shift in the dominant strategy, with a 1:2 ratio, 277 koinobionts (32.78%) and 568 idiobionts (67.22%). Both strategies were represented by 11 parasitoid guilds, with no significant differences in the abundance between sites (50.26% collected in Yabucú and 49.74% in Noh Bec) (Table 3).

Table 2. Abundance of each development strategy at each site

Table 3. Guild abundance in two tropical forest

Koinobionts were more abundant in the LDF, with gPh and cPh as the best-represented guilds; idiobionts showed a reduced guild composition, Unkn and Coc being the only guilds observed (Figure 2). By contrast, in idiobionts were more abundant in the MSEF; however, as in the LDF, koinobionts showed more heterogeneous communities than idiobionts. This suggests that sites with more complex tropical vegetation (MSEF) simultaneously host a large number of specialist (koinobiontes) and generalist (idiobiontes) taxa (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Rank–abundance plots of ichneumonid guilds ensembles collected from LDF and SMEF. A logarithmic scale of abundance was plotted against the species-rank ordered by guilds, from those with the most abundant individuals to those with the fewest.

When comparing the composition of koinobiont assemblages collected in the two vegetation types (LDF and MSEF), the slope of the curve found in the LDF reflects less even — and, therefore, less diverse — assemblages than in Noh Bec, with gPh and cPh being the dominant guilds. For its part, in the MSEF there was no marked dominance, but the most abundant guild was cPh (Figure 2). In the case of the composition of idiobiont ichneumonid assemblages collected in the two vegetation types (LDF and MSEF), the highest guild richness was observed in the MSEF of Noh Bec, with Unkn and Coc being the most abundant guilds; this contrasts with the Yabucú LDF, where only 2 guilds were found (Figure 2).

Influence of foliar characteristics and herbivory on the establishment of guilds

In Table 4 is given the partial correlation coefficients among parasitoids guild’s abundances, it is noteworthy that some of them are highly correlated (i.e. the absolute value of partial r is close to 1), indicating that many of them could be driven by the same environmental factors.

Table 4. Partial correlation coefficients among guilds’ abundances, all P values were < 0.05

There were only two guilds which abundances were correlated with vegetation or herbivory variables; Hyp, which was positively correlated to holes in adults, and Myc which was negatively correlated to FAS, Fluctuating Asymmetry Seedlings, although this partial correlation was marginally significant (P = 0.06). In Figure 3, the correlation networks among these guilds and other variables are shown.

Figure 3. Correlation networks between guilds’ abundances (in orange rectangles) and the other variables (in blue rectangles). Blue links are positive correlations, while red ones are negative. Link between Adult Thickness (A.T) and Seedling Thickness (S.T.), is represented thicker for stressing the strong direct correlation. All P were < 0.05, except for Myc with AFP, with P = 0.065.

Discussion

Development strategies and composition of ichneumonid assemblages

The observed differences in the proportions of koinobionts and idiobionts between the two localities can be explained because the vegetation structure represented in the LDF is less complex. Consequently, the predominant development strategy in the biological composition of Ichneumonidae assemblages consists of highly specialized parasitoids that attack specific hosts associated with a certain plant composition: koinobiosis (Sheenan & Hawkins Reference Sheehan and Hawkins1991).

These results seem to contradict the host predation hypothesis (Rathcke & Price Reference Rathcke and Price1976), the parasitoid predation hypothesis (Gauld Reference Gauld1988), and the resource fragmentation hypothesis (Janzen Reference Janzen1981). In the first two cases, as a result of stronger selective pressures by predators on specialist koinobionts taxa, and in the third, due to the supposed low host density, a higher abundance of generalist idiobionts is predicted in sites with tropical vegetation (Borer et al. Reference Borer, Seabloom, Tilman and Novotny2012). However, since the abundance and diversity of koinobiont guilds in Yabucú are higher than those of idiobionts, the results indicate that the disturbed and non-diverse LDF is capable of hosting a wide range of specialist taxa.

A more comprehensive interpretation of the resource fragmentation hypothesis (Janzen Reference Janzen1981) indicates that the low host density in the Yabucú LDF probably acts by selecting koinobionts that are extremely efficient in locating scattered hosts. In addition, most koinobionts are endoparasitoids, that is, they oviposite inside the eggs or early-stage larvae of their hosts (Shaw & Huddleston Reference Shaw and Huddleston1991). Therefore, they are more likely to be successful in environments with higher abiotic stress, such as LDF, where insolation is higher than in the MSEF.

On the other hand, a higher abundance of idiobionts was found in the Noh Bec MSEF, being Unkn and Coc the dominant guilds. By contrast, koinobionts formed more even assemblages in terms of abundance, with cPh being the most abundant guild (Figure 4). This may be due to the fact that the most complex and diverse vegetation has a greater number of plant species and, according to the enemy hypothesis (Root Reference Root1973), it is predictive of a higher diversity of herbivores and, therefore, a wider range of hosts than simpler vegetation structures. The above is consistent with idiobionts being mostly ectoparasitoids and generalists (Shaw & Huddleston Reference Shaw and Huddleston1991), so they can be favored in forests with greater vegetation structural complexity. Likewise, this could be explained based on the theory of host predation (Rathcke & Price Reference Rathcke and Price1976), which predicts that parasitized herbivores will be subjected to heavier predation than healthy individuals. Therefore, parasitoids would display higher juvenile mortality rates, leading to a larger number of parasitoids exploiting hosts less susceptible to predation (e.g. pupae) or hosts that hide and are protected by plant parts, as do many idiobiont taxa.

An additional explanation (not mutually exclusive with the above) becomes evident when observing that the most abundant idiobiont guild in both sites is Unkn, suggesting that although idiobionts are well-represented, there is little knowledge about their taxonomy and biology in tropical regions (Veijalainen et al. Reference Veijalainen, Wahlberg, Broad, Erwin, Longino and Sääksjärvi2012), both in the Yabucú LDF and in the Noh Bec MSEF. Likewise, when observing the koinobiont guilds in both sites, it becomes evident that Unkn is among the dominant guilds. This indicates the enormous knowledge gap about the guilds of Ichneumonidae parasitoids in tropical regions. It is necessary to carry out more studies relating the parasitoid biology with vegetation, climate and host species, which will help us to understand the observed patterns.

Influence of foliar characteristics and herbivory on the establishment of guilds

It was observed that seedling fluctuating asymmetry (FAS) increased with holes in leaves of seedlings and adult plants (HS and HA respectively). It is noteworthy that it has been reported that tropical tree species with higher herbivory presented higher fluctuating asymmetry level (Cuevas-Reyes et al. Reference Cuevas-Reyes, Gilberti, González-Rodríguez and Fernandes2013). The fluctuating assimetry (FAS) is an indirect indicator of herbivory, which tends to be higher in the low deciduous forest (Yabucú); fungi are also scarcer in this dryer forest, which in turn leads to lower abundances of the organisms related to this energy channel. This may explain the negative correlation between FAS and Myc (parasitoids attacking larvae found the fruiting bodies of mushrooms).

All hyperparasitoids (Hyp) belonged to the family Mesochorinae, and were positively associated with holes in adult plants (HA). The host species of this family, which are in turn parasitoids of herbivores, are strongly associated with vegetation structure and herbivores abundance, which may be indirectly indicated by HA.

Conclusion

Herbivory-induced changes in vegetation structure favor and are key factors in the establishment of guilds and development strategies of the Ichneumonidae. Studying them offers a supplementary tool to efficiently characterize and describe the composition of these parasitoid assemblages, especially in tropical regions with LDF and MSEF.

We found that a herbivory indicator such as holes in leaves of adults (HA) is correlated to hyperparasitoid abundance, which is in turn significantly correlated to several other parasitoid guilds, this is expected as more herbivore may be indicating larger populations of herbivores, as well as of their enemies, some of which are the host species of the hyperparasitoids.

We also found a negative correlation among fluctuating asymmetry (FAS) and the parasitoids feeding on the larvae which live in mushrooms; this could be explained as FAS is higher in the dryer forest, in which fungi are not as abundant, affecting the rest of the trophic chain depending on them.

The distribution of development strategies of Ichneumonidae observed in this study follows a clear pattern: specialist koinobionts are associated with LDF (Yabucú) and generalist idiobionts are mainly associated with the site with MSEF (Noh Bec). However, the fact that the parasitoid guild whose hosts are unknown (Unkn) is among the dominant guilds in both sites and development strategies suggests that any anomalies in the latitudinal distribution of tropical Ichneumonidae are likely artifacts resulting from biased sampling methods leading to underestimating the true diversity of this family in the tropics, particularly in the case of small koinobionts.

Future studies should include experimental designs (supplementing traditional sampling methods) to determine and evaluate the impact of the set of auditory, visual, and chemical stimuli unrelated to vegetation, such as odor traces emitted by potential hosts and other parasitoids. Also, it is important to note that this study only covers the patterns associated to the rainy season, so studies in different seasons are necessary for understanding further the ecology of parasitoids and preys.

Since parasitoids play a central role in multitrophic interactions, underestimating the diversity of tropical Ichneumonidae challenges not only any conclusions about latitudinal trends in the family, but also any conclusion about the level of impact of ichneumonid species on the tropical ecosystem dynamics in the Yucatan Peninsula.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of Yabucú (Yucatán, Mexico), especially to David González for providing authorization for allow access in this protected area. We also want to thank to María Virginia Solis Montero for their help with fieldwork and we greatly acknowledge to Dr José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni and Dr Juan Manuel Dupuy for their help with vegetation data.

Financial support

This study was supported by Project CONACyT titled ‘Diversidad de parasitoides y su relación con la complejidad estructural de la vegetación: modelos predictivos a nivel climático y de paisaje’ (Grant number: CB-2014-01, 241138).

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Ethical statement

None.

References

Askew, RR and Shaw, MR (1986) Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development. In Waage, J and Greathead, D (eds), Insect Parasitoids. 13th Symposium of Royal Entomological Society of London. London: Academic Press, pp. 225264.Google Scholar
Borer, ET, Seabloom, EW, Tilman, D and Novotny, V (2012) Plant diversity controls arthropod biomass and temporal stability. Ecology letters 15, 14571464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castelo, MK, van Nouhuys, S and Corley, JC (2010) Olfactory attraction of the larval parasitoid, Hyposoterh orticola, to plants infested with eggs of the Host Butterfly, Melitea cinxia. Journal of Insect Science 10(53), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan-Canché, R, Ballina-Gómez, H, Leirana-Alcocer, J, Bordera, S and González-Moreno, A (2020) Sampling of parasitoid hymenoptera: Influence of the height on the ground. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 78, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cournoyer, M and Boivin, G (2004) Infochemical-mediated preference behavior of the parasitoid Microctonus hyperodae when searching for its adult weevil hosts. Entomologia Experimentis et Applicata 112, 117124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, MJ (1983) Herbivory: the dynamics of animal plant interactions. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Cuevas-Reyes, P, Gilberti, L, González-Rodríguez, A and Fernandes, GW (2013) Patterns of herbivory and fluctuating asymmetry in Solanum lycocarpum St. Hill (Solanaceae) along an urban gradient in Brazil. Ecological Indicators 24, 557561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Guido, JS and Espejel-Carvajal, I (1994) Tipos de vegetación de la Península de Yucatán (No. Y/581.61 E8/3). Mérida, Yucatán, México, Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.Google Scholar
Fraser, SE, Dytham, C and Mayhew, PJ (2007) Determinants of parasitoid abundance and diversity in woodland habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology 44(2), 352361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauld, ID (1988) Evolutionary patterns of host utilization by ichneumonid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae and Braconidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35, 351377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giunti, G, Canale, A, Messing, RH, Donati, E, Stefanini, C, Michaud, JP and Benelli, G (2015) Parasitoid learning: current knowledge and implications for biological control. Biological control 90, 208219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, Ø, Harper, DAT and Ryan, PD (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm Google Scholar
Hawkins, BA (1988) Species diversity in the third and fourth trophic levels: patterns and mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 137162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, BA and Lawton, JH (1987) Species richness for parasitoids of British phytophagous insects. Nature 326, 788790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, BA, Shaw, MR and Askew, RR (1992) Relations among assemblage size, host specialization, and climatic variability in North American parasitoid communities. The American Naturalist 139, 5879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J, Harvey, I and Hubbard, S (1994) Host-Searching Behavior of Venturia canescens (Grav.) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): Superparasitism. Journal of Insect Behavior 7 (4), 455462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH (1981) The Peak in North American Ichneumonid Species Richness Lies Between 38º and 42º N. Ecology 62 (3), 532537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koricheva, J, Mulder, CP, Schmid, B, Joshi, J and Huss-Danell, K (2000) Numerical responses of different trophic groups of invertebrates to manipulations of plant diversity in grasslands. Oecologia 125(2), 271282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magurran, AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 255.Google Scholar
Mazón, M and Bordera, S (2014) Diversity of ichneumonidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) in a protected area of central Spain: what are we protecting? Insect Conservation and Diversity 7, 432452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathcke, BJ, Price, PW (1976) Anomalous diversity of tropical ichneumonid parasitoids: a predation hypothesis. American Naturalist 110, 889893.Google Scholar
Root, RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological monographs 43(1), 95124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sääksjärvi, IE, Ruokolainen, K, Tuomisto, H, Haataja, S, Fine, PV, Cárdenas, G and Vargas, V (2006) Comparing composition and diversity of parasitoid wasps and plants in an Amazonian rain-forest mosaic. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22(02), 167176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, MR and Huddleston, T (1991) Classification and biology of braconid wasps. Handbooks for the identification of British insects 7(11), 126.Google Scholar
Sheehan, W and Hawkins, BA (1991) Attack strategy as an indicator of host range in metopiine and pimpline Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Ecological Entomology 16, 129131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sime, K (2004) The Natural history of the parasitic wasp Trogus pennator (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): Host-finding behavior and a possible host countermeasure. Journal of Natural History 39 (17), 13671380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, K and Ueno, T (2015) Host Approaching Behavior in a Parasitoid Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) as Influenced by Physiological State and Host Type. Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology 4, 159.Google Scholar
Veijalainen, A, Wahlberg, N, Broad, GR, Erwin, TL, Longino, JT and Sääksjärvi, IE (2012) Unprecedented ichneumonid parasitoid wasp diversity in tropical forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279 (1748), 46944698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y and Adams, J (2011) Top-down control of herbivores varies with ecosystem types. Journal of Ecology 99 (2), 370372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Diagram indicating the vegetation sampling area (filled in green). The red spot corresponding to Malaise trap.

Figure 1

Table 1. Types of foliar herbivory (Crawley 1983)

Figure 2

Table 2. Abundance of each development strategy at each site

Figure 3

Table 3. Guild abundance in two tropical forest

Figure 4

Figure 2. Rank–abundance plots of ichneumonid guilds ensembles collected from LDF and SMEF. A logarithmic scale of abundance was plotted against the species-rank ordered by guilds, from those with the most abundant individuals to those with the fewest.

Figure 5

Table 4. Partial correlation coefficients among guilds’ abundances, all P values were < 0.05

Figure 6

Figure 3. Correlation networks between guilds’ abundances (in orange rectangles) and the other variables (in blue rectangles). Blue links are positive correlations, while red ones are negative. Link between Adult Thickness (A.T) and Seedling Thickness (S.T.), is represented thicker for stressing the strong direct correlation. All P were < 0.05, except for Myc with AFP, with P = 0.065.