Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:55:46.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution of androdioecious and hermaphroditic populations of the mangrove Laguncularia racemosa (Combretaceae) in Florida and the Bahamas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Carol L. Landry*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA
Beverly J. Rathcke
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA
Lee B. Kass
Affiliation:
L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Present address: Ohio State University–Mansfield, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, 1760 University Dr., Mansfield, OH 44906, USA. Email: [email protected]

Abstract:

The breeding system of Laguncularia racemosa is variable among populations; some populations are androdioecious while other populations lack male plants. To determine whether androdioecy is widespread in L. racemosa, 65 populations were surveyed in Florida and the Bahamas. Fruits are water-dispersed, so the observed distribution of breeding systems was compared to local and regional water currents in order to determine whether dispersal could be important to the maintenance of male plants in androdioecious populations. Twenty-two of the 36 populations surveyed in Florida were androdioecious, with male frequencies that ranged from 1–68%. On the Florida east coast, all populations north of latitude 26°30′ N lacked males while all populations south of this latitude were androdioecious, which suggests that northern populations may lack males due to dispersal limitation. The pattern of distribution on the Florida west coast suggests that males may be maintained in some populations via dispersal. Nine islands in north-central Bahamas were surveyed, and androdioecious populations were found only on San Salvador Island, where male frequencies ranged from 5–28%. Dispersal, fragmentation, and selection hypotheses are suggested to explain the observed pattern of distribution; these hypotheses will be tested in future studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

AKIMOTO, J., FUKUHARA, T. & KIKUZAWA, K. 1999. Sex ratios and genetic variation in a functionally androdioecious species, Schizopepon bryoniaefolius (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 86:880886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERRY, P. E., HOLST, B. K. & YATSKIEVYCH, K. (eds.). 1998. Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana: Volume 4 (Caesalpiniaceae-Ericaceae). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. 799 pp.Google Scholar
CAREW, J. L. & MYLROIE, J. E. 1985. The Pleistocene and Holocene stratigraphy of San Salvador Island, Bahamas, with reference to marine and terrestrial lithofacies at French Bay. Pp. 1161 in Curran, H. A. (ed.). Pleistocene and Holocene carbonate environments on San Salvador Island, Bahamas- Guidebook for Geological Society of America, Orlando annual meeting field trip. CCFL Bahamian Field Station, Ft. Lauderdale.Google Scholar
CHARLESWORTH, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23:333348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORRELL, D. S. & CORRELL, H. B. 1982. Flora of the Bahama Archipelago. J. Cramer, Vaduz. 1692 pp.Google Scholar
DOMMEE, B., GESLOT, A., THOMPSON, J. D., REILLE, M. & DENELLE, N. 1999. Androdioecy in the entomophilous tree Fraxinus ornus (Oleaceae). New Phytologist 143:419426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EDWARDS, D. C. 1996. The inland saline waters of the Bahamas, as distinctive scientific resources. Pp. 152–162 in Elliott, N. B., Edwards, D. C. & Godfrey, P. J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 6th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Bahamian Field Station Ltd., San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
GILLIS, W. T. 1974. Phantoms in the flora of the Bahamas. Phytologia 29:154166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GODFREY, P. J., EDWARDS, D. C., DAVIS, R. L. & SMITH, R. R. 1994. Natural history of northeastern San Salvador Island, a “New World” where the New World began. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador Island. 28 pp.Google Scholar
ISHIDA, K. & HIURA, T. 1998. Pollen fertility and flowering phenology in an androdioecious tree, Fraxinus lanuginosa (Oleaceae), in Hokkaido, Japan. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159:941947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KASS, L. B. 2005. An illustrated guide to common plants of San Salvador Island, Bahamas (2nd edition). Gerace Research Center, San Salvador Island. 148 pp.Google Scholar
LANDRY, C. L. 2005. Androdioecy in white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa): maintenance of a rare breeding system through plant-pollinator interactions. University of Michigan (Ph.D. dissertation), Ann Arbor. 166 pp.Google Scholar
LANDRY, C. L. & RATHCKE, B. J. 2007. Do inbreeding depression and relative male fitness explain the maintenance of androdioecy in white mangrove, Laguncularia racemosa (Combretaceae)? New Phytologist 176:891901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LANDRY, C., RATHCKE, B. J., KASS, L. B., ELLIOTT, N. B. & BOOTHE, R. 2005. Flower visitors to white mangrove: a comparison between three Bahamian islands and Florida. Pp. 84–94 in Buckner, S. & McGrath, T. (eds.). Proceedings of the 10th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Gerace Research Center, San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
LANDRY, C. L., RATHCKE, B. J. & KASS, L. B. 2007. The natural history of white mangrove, Laguncularia racemosa (Combretaceae): the forgotten mangrove. Pp. 43–53 in Rathcke, B. J. & Hays, W. (eds.). Proceedings of the 11th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Gerace Research Centre, San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
LIOGIER, A. H. 1989. La flora de la Española V. Universidad Central del Este, San Pedro de Macorís. 588 pp.Google Scholar
LIOGIER, A. H. 1994. Descriptive flora of Puerto Rico and adjacent islands: Spermatophyta Volume III Cyrillaceae to Myrtaceae. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Río Piedras. 482 pp.Google Scholar
LISTON, A., RIESEBERG, L. H. & ELIAS, T. S. 1990. Datisca glomerata is functionally androdioecious. Nature 343:641642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LLOYD, D. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45:325339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OBBARD, D. J., HARRIS, S. A. & PANNELL, J. R. 2006. Sexual systems and population genetic structure in an annual plant: testing the metapopulation model. American Naturalist 167:354366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PANNELL, J. 1997a. Variation in sex ratios and sex allocation in androdioecious Mercurialis annua. Journal of Ecology 85:5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PANNELL, J. 1997b. Widespread functional androdioecy in Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61:95116.Google Scholar
PANNELL, J. 1997c. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51:1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PANNELL, J. R. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:397425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PANNELL, J. R. & OJEDA, F. 2000. Patterns of flowering and sex-ratio variation in the Mediterranean shrub Phillyrea angustifolia (Oleaceae): implications for the maintenance of males with hermaphrodites. Ecology Letters 3:495502.Google Scholar
RATHCKE, B. J. & LANDRY, C. L. 2003. Dispersal and recruitment of white mangrove on San Salvador Island, Bahamas after Hurricane Floyd. Pp. 34–40 in Smith, D. L. & Smith, S. (eds.). Proceedings of the 9th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Gerace Research Center, San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
RATHCKE, B., KASS, L. & HUNT, R. E. 1996. Preliminary observations on plant reproductive biology in mangrove communities on San Salvador Island, Bahamas. Pp. 87–96 in Elliott, N. B., Edwards, D. C. & Godfrey, P. J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 6th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Bahamian Field Station Ltd., San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
RATHCKE, B. J., LANDRY, C. L. & KASS, L. B. 2001a. White mangrove: are males necessary? Pp. 89–96 in Clark-Simpson, C. & Smith, G. (eds.). Proceedings of the 8th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Gerace Research Center, San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
RATHCKE, B. J., KASS, L. B. & ELLIOTT, N. B. 2001b. Flower visitors to black mangrove and white mangrove on San Salvador Island, Bahamas. Pp. 68–77 in Clark-Simpson, C. & Smith, G. (eds.). Proceedings of the 8th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Gerace Research Center, San Salvador Island.Google Scholar
SMITH, R. R. 1993. Field guide to the vegetation of San Salador Island, The Bahamas. (Second edition). Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador Island. 120 pp.Google Scholar
STEVENS, W. D., ULLOA, C. U., POOL, A. & MONTIEL, O. M. (eds.). 2001. Flora de Nicaragua: Volume 1, Introducción gimnospermas y angiospermas (Acanthaceae-Euphorbiaceae). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. 2666 pp.Google Scholar
TEETER, J. W. 1985. Holocene lacustrine depositional history. Pp. 133145 in Curran, H. A. (ed.). Pleistocene and Holocene carbonate environments on San Salvador Island, Bahamas- Guidebook for Geological Society of America, Orlando annual meeting field trip. CCFL Bahamian Field Station, Ft. Lauderdale.Google Scholar
TOMCZAK, M. & GODFREY, J. S. 1994. Regional oceanography: an introduction. Elsevier Science Incorporated, New York. 422 pp.Google Scholar
TOMLINSON, P. B. 1986. The botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 413 pp.Google Scholar
TOMLINSON, P. B. 2001. The biology of trees native to tropical Florida. (Second edition). Published privately, Petersham. 395 pp.Google Scholar
VASSILIADIS, C., VALERO, M., SAUMITOU-LAPRADE, P. & GODELLE, B. 2000. A model for the evolution of high frequencies of males in an androdioecious plant based on a cross-compatibility advantage of males. Heredity 85:413422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar