Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:57:16.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential plant damage due to litterfall in palm-dominated forest stands in a Central Pacific atoll – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2015

Hillary S. Young ,
Douglas J. McCauley ,
Amanda Pollock  and
Rodolfo Dirzo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 573
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

On page 234 the caption to Figure 1 should have read as follows:

Figure 1. Annual levels of damage (% damaged individuals y−1) to artificial seedlings reported in other studies (black bars) from a wide variety of temperate and tropical forests are consistent with those observed in the mixed-dicot, native-species-dominated stands in this study (first white bar), and much lower than those observed in high Cocos nucifera-dominated stands (second white bar). We present average values for each type of system studied from (1) New Zealand (Gilman et al. 2002); (2) New Jersey (McCarthy & Facelli 1990); (3) Hawaii (Drake & Pratt 2001); (4) Panama (Alvarez-Clare & Kitajima 2009), (5) Brazil (Portela & Santos (2009), (6) Mack (1998), (7) Line Islands (Young et al. this study), (8) Marquez et al. (2010), (9) Costa Rica (Clark & Clark1989), (10) Central Amazonia (Scariot 2000).

References

REFERENCE

YOUNG, H. S., MCCAULEY, D. J., POLLOCK, A. & DIRZO, R. 2014. Differential plant damage due to litterfall in palm-dominated forest stands in a Central Pacific atoll. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Annual levels of damage (% damaged individuals y−1) to artificial seedlings reported in other studies (black bars) from a wide variety of temperate and tropical forests are consistent with those observed in the mixed-dicot, native-species-dominated stands in this study (first white bar), and much lower than those observed in high Cocos nucifera-dominated stands (second white bar). We present average values for each type of system studied from (1) New Zealand (Gilman et al. 2002); (2) New Jersey (McCarthy & Facelli 1990); (3) Hawaii (Drake & Pratt 2001); (4) Panama (Alvarez-Clare & Kitajima 2009), (5) Brazil (Portela & Santos (2009), (6) Mack (1998), (7) Line Islands (Young et al. this study), (8) Marquez et al. (2010), (9) Costa Rica (Clark & Clark1989), (10) Central Amazonia (Scariot 2000).