Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:57:35.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of amphibian communities through time and from place to place in Bornean forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Robert F. Inger  and
Harold K. Voris
Robert F. Inger
Affiliation:
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Harold K. Voris
Affiliation:
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We sampled riparian frogs along 18 streams at eight localities in Borneo. At four of these sites we sampled during more than one year. Altogether 49 species were included in our study and total sample size was 13,249. We measured overlap in species occurrences and arrays of abundances within and among localities. Variation over the time span of our study was minor within communities. Overlaps between streams at a locality were generally higher than overlaps of pairs of streams from different localities. Environmental variation, particularly in stream width and gradient, had a clear effect on both intra-and inter-locality overlaps. Although rainfall varied between localities and within localities over time, that variation did not seem to affect overlaps among or within communities. Environmental factors did not account for all differences in overlaps between communities. Instead, regional processes, perhaps the timing of barriers or speciation events, appear to have been responsible for geographic restrictions of several species, leading to variation in overlap values.

Keywords

anuransBorneocommunity structurecommunity variationMalaysiarain forests
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 1993 , pp. 409 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Crump, M. L. 1971. Quantitative analysis of the ecological distribution of a tropical herpetofauna. Occasional Papers, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 3:1–62.Google Scholar
Duellman, W. E. & Lynch, J. D. 1969. Descriptions of Atelopus tadpoles and their relevance to atelopodid classification. Herpetologica 25:231–240.Google Scholar
Gascon, C. 1991. Populations and community-level analyses of species occurrences of Central Amazonian rainforest tadpoles. Ecology 72:1731–1746.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38:210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, W. R. 1973. Ecological interactions of frog larvae at a seasonal tropical location in Thailand. Journal of Herpetology 7:337–361.Google Scholar
Horn, H. 1966. The measurement of ‘overlap’ in comparative ecological studies. American Naturalist 100:419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inger, R. F. 1966. The systematics and zoogeography of the Amphibia of Borneo. Fieldiana: Zoology 52:1–402.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F. 1969. Organization of communities of frogs along small rain forest streams in Sarawak. Journal of Animal Ecology 38:123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inger, R. F. 1972. Bufo of Eurasia. Pp. 108–118, 357–360 in Blair, F. W. (ed.). Evolution in the genus Bufo. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F. 1985. Tadpoles of the forested regions of Borneo. Fieldiana: Zoology (n.s.) 26:1–89.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F. 1992. Variation of apomorphic characters in stream-dwelling tadpoles of the bufonid genus Ansonia (Amphibia: Anura). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 105:225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inger, R. F. & Colwell, R. K. 1977. Organization of contiguous communities of amphibians and reptiles in Thailand. Ecological Monographs 47:229–253.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F. & Dring, J. 1988. Taxonoraic and ecological relations of Bornean stream toads allied to Ansonia leptopus (Guenther) (Anura: Bufonidae). Malayan Nature Journal 419:461–471.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F. & Greenberg, B. 1966. Ecological and competitive relations among three species of frog (genus Rana). Ecology 47:746–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inger, R. F. & Stuebing, R. B. 1991. Frogs of Sabah. Sabah Parks Publication, no. 10.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F. & Stuebing, R. B. 1992. The montane amphibian fauna of northwestern Borneo. Malayan Nature Journal 46:41–51.Google Scholar
Inger, R. F., Voris, H. K. & Frogner, K. J. 1986. Organization of a community of tadpoles in rain forest streams in Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2:193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M., Inger, R. F. & King, F. W. 1968. On the diversity of reptile and amphibian species in a Bornean rain forest. American Naturalist 102:497–515.Google Scholar
Matsui, M. 1986. Three new species of Amolops from Borneo. Copeia 1986:623–630.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, R. W. 1978. Evolution of parental care in frogs. Pp. 127–147 in Burkhardt, G. M. & Bekoff, M. (eds). The development of behavior: comparative and evolutionary aspects. STPM Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. 1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235:167–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toft, C. A. & Duellman, W. E. 1979. Anurans of the lower Rio Llullapichis, Amazonian Peru: a preliminary analysis of community structure. Herpetologica 35:71–77.Google Scholar
Wolda, H. 1981. Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50:296–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed