Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:12:36.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bird communities in Panamanian black mangroves: potential effects of physical and biotic factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Gaëtan Lefebvre  and
Brigitte Poulin
Gaëtan Lefebvre*
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P.O. Box 2072, Ancon, Republic of Panama
Brigitte Poulin*
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P.O. Box 2072, Ancon, Republic of Panama
*
1Station Biologique Tour au Valat, Le Sambuc, 13200 Aries, France.
1Station Biologique Tour au Valat, Le Sambuc, 13200 Aries, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Isolated in forest patches, mangrove stands often experience different physical conditions (rainfall, tide, salinity) despite similar floristic composition and structure. These abiotic factors are known to influence mangrove phenology but their potential effect on the local invertebrate and bird fauna have not been investigated. This study contrasts two sites of black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) located on the Caribbean and Pacific coasts of Panama. The two mangrove sites are characterized by different rainfall and tide patterns, and consequently ground inundation and salinity. These mangrove sites also differed in their plant phenology as well as invertebrate and bird composition. Although 95% of the bird species sampled occur on both coasts, the two mangrove sites shared only 34%. Moreover, each bird community was composed of a particular feeding guild assemblage consistent with the abundance distribution of their invertebrate-prey. Because floristically similar mangrove stands can support different invertebrate and bird faunas, conservation efforts should target mangrove patches submitted to different physical factors in order to preserve biodiversity.

Keywords

arthropodsbirdsclimateconservationdietfeeding guildsmangrovePanamaphenologyphysical factors
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 97 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Andersen, N. M. 1982. The semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera, Gerromorpha). Phytogeny, adaptations, biogeography and classification. Entomonograph Vol. 3, Scandinavian Science Press Ltd, Klampenborg, Denmark. 455 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasco, F. 1984. Climatic factor and the biology of mangrove plants. Pp. 18–35 in Snedaker, S. C. & Snedaker, J. G. (eds). The mangrove ecosystem: research methods. UNESCO, Bungay. 251 pp.Google Scholar
Borror, D. J., Delong, D. M. & Triplehorn, C. A. 1976. An introduction to the study of insects. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York. 852 pp.Google Scholar
Chapman, V. J. 1977. Introduction. Pp. 1–30 in Chapman, V. J. (ed.). Ecosystems of the world. 1. Wet coastal ecosystems. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. 1968. Spiders, scorpions, centipedes and mites. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 278 pp.Google Scholar
Daiber, F. C. 1977. Salt-marsh animals: distribution related to tidal flooding, salinity and vegetation. Pp. 79–108 in Chapman, V. J. (ed.). Ecosystems of the world. 1. Wet coastal ecosystem. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Daly, H. V., Doyen, J. T. & Ehrlich, P. R. 1978. Introduction to insect biology and diversity. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 564 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, L. V. & Gray, I. E. 1966. Zonal and seasonal distribution of insects in North Carolina salt marshes. Ecological Monographs 36:275–295.Google Scholar
Duke, N. C. 1990. Phenological trends with latitude in the mangrove tree Avicennia marina. Journal of Ecology 78:113–133.Google Scholar
Elhaï, H. 1968. Biogéographie. Librairie Armand Colin, Paris. 378 pp.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. A. 1992. Mangrove forests of the Pacific coast of Central America. Pp. 259–267 in Seeliger, U. (ed.). Coastal plant communities of Latin America. Academic Press Inc., New York. 392 pp.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. A. 1994. Los manglares del Pacifico de Centroamérica. Editorial Fundación UNA, Heredia, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, G. & Poulin, B. 1996. Seasonal abundance of migrant birds and food resources in Panamanian mangrove forests. Wilson Bulletin 108:748–759.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, G., Poulin, B. & McNeil, R. 1992. Settlement period and function of long-term territory in tropical mangrove passerines. Condor 94:83–92.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, G., Poulin, B. & McNeil, R. 1994. Temporal dynamics of mangrove bird communities in Venezuela, with special reference to migrant warblers. Auk 111:405–415.Google Scholar
Lin, G. & Sternberg, L. da L. 1992. Effects of growth form, salinity, nutrient and sulfide on photosynthesis, carbon isotope discrimination and growth of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19:509–517.Google Scholar
López-Portillo, J. & Ezcurra, E. 1985. Litter fall of Avicennia gcrminans L. in a one-year cycle in a mudflat at the laguna de Mecoacan, Tabasco, Mexico. Biotropica 17:186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugo, A. E. & Snedaker, S. C. 1974. The ecology of mangroves. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:39–69.Google Scholar
McKee, K. L., Mendelssohn, I. A. & Hester, M. W. 1988. Reexamination of pore water sulfide concentrations and redox potentials near the aerial roots of Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans. American Journal of Botany 75:1352–1359.Google Scholar
Noske, R. A. 1995. The ecology of mangrove forest birds in Peninsular Malaysia. Ibis 137:250–263.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. 1982. The geographic and environmental aspects of mangrove communities: climate. Pp. 19–30 in Clough, B. F. (ed.). Mangrove ecosystems in Australia: structure, function and management. Australian Institute of Marine Science in association with Australian National University Press, Canberra. 302 pp.Google Scholar
Onuf, C. P., Teal, J. M. & Valiela, I. 1977. Interactions of nutrients, plant growth and herbivory in a mangrove ecosystem. Ecology 58:514–526.Google Scholar
Por, F. D. 1984. Editor's note on tides and water levels in the mangal. Pp. 25–26 in Por, F. D. & Dor, I. (eds). Hydrobiology of the mangal: the ecosystem of the mangrove forests. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague. 266 pp.Google Scholar
Poulin, B. & Lefebvre, G. 1995. Additional information on the use of tartar emetic in determining the diet of tropical birds. Condor 97:897–902.Google Scholar
Poulin, B. & Lefebvre, G. 1996. Dietary relationships between Nearctic migrant and resident species from a humid forest in Panama. Auk 113:277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, B., Lefebvre, G. & McNeil, R. 1994. Effect and efficiency of tartar emetic in determining the diet of tropical land birds. Condor 96:98–104.Google Scholar
Rappole, J. H. 1995. The ecology of migrant birds: a Neotropical perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.269 pp.Google Scholar
Ridgely, R. S. & Gwynne, J. A. Jr. 1989. A guide to the birds of Panama with Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Honduras. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 534 pp.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. 1975. Some aspects of the ecology of tropical estuaries. Pp. 313–333 in Golley, F. B. & Medina, E. (eds). Tropical ecological systems, trend in terrestrial and aquatic research. Springer-Verlag, New York. 398 pp.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. 887 pp.Google Scholar
Suman, D. O. 1994a. El ecosistema de manglar en América Latinay la cuenca del Caribe: su manejo y conservatión. Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami and The Tinker Foundation, New York. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Suman, D. O. 1994b. Status of mangroves in Latin America and the Caribbean Basin. Pp. 11–20 in Suman, D. O. (ed.). El ecosistema de manglar en América Latina y la cuenca del Caribe: su manejo y conservatión. Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami and The Tinker Foundation, New York. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1989. Where have all the birds gone? Essays on the biology and conservation of birds that migrate to the American tropics. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 207 pp.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. 1994. The botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 419 pp.Google Scholar
Tostain, O. 1986. Étude d'une succession terrestre en milieu tropical: les relations entre la physionomie végétale et la structure du peuplement avien en mangrove Guyanaise. Terre el Vie 41:315–342.Google Scholar
Walter, H. 1977. Climate. Pp. 31–60 in Chapman, V. J. (ed.). Ecosystems of the world. 1. Wet coastal ecosystems. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York. 428 pp.Google Scholar
West, R. C. 1977. Tidal salt-marshes and mangal formation of Middle and South America. Pp. 193–213 in Chapman, V. J. (ed.). Ecosystems of the world. 1. Wet coastal ecosystems. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Wium-Andersen, S. & Christensen, B. 1978. Seasonal growth of mangrove trees in southern Thailand. II. Phenology of Bruguiera cylindrica, Ceriops tagal, Lumnitzera littorea and Avicennia marina. Aquatic Botany 5:383–390.Google Scholar