Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:23:27.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are leaf-litter frogs and lizards affected by edge effects due to forest fragmentation in Brazilian Atlantic forest?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Marianna Dixo*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14 no. 321, 05508–090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Marcio Martins
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14 no. 321, 05508–090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Extract

Edge effects encompass biotic and abiotic changes resulting from the interaction between two different habitat types (Murcia 1995). Edge habitats are ecologically distinct from patch interiors, and understanding how ecological patterns change near edges is important in understanding landscape-level dynamics such as the impacts of fragmentation (Ries et al. 2004). Abiotic conditions at the forest edge, such as increased wind and solar radiation, increased fluctuations in temperature, and decreased humidity, may affect forest-adapted organisms (Harper et al. 2005, Murcia 1995). So, edges may affect lizards and amphibians due to their physiological needs (Lehtinen et al. 2003, Vallan 2000). Anurans are considered sensitive to environmental changes due to their permeable skin, shell-less eggs and use of land as well as freshwater habitats (Vallan 2000). Changes in vegetation structure and microclimate are likely to be the predominant factor affecting amphibian abundances across edges (Jellinek et al. 2004, Marsh & Pearman 1997, Schaepfer & Gavin 2001, Urbina-Cardona et al. 2006).

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ARGÔLO, A. J. S. 2004. As serpentes dos Cacauais do Sudeste da Bahia. Editora da UESC, Ilhéus. 260 pp.Google Scholar
BECKER, C. G., FONSECA, C. R., HADDAD, C. F. B., BATISTA, R. F. & PRADO, P. I. 2007. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318:17751777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BLAUSTEIN, A. R., WAKE, D. & SOUSA, W. P. 1994. Amphibians declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conservation Biology 8:6071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CANEDO, C., DIXO, M. & POMBAL, J. P. 2004. A new species of Chiasmocleis Méhelÿ, 1904 (Anura, Microhylidae) from the Atlantic rainforest of Bahia, Brazil. Herpetologica 60:495501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CECHIN, S. Z. & MARTINS, M. 2000. Eficiência de armadilhas de queda (pitfall traps) em amostragens de anfíbios e répteis no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17:729740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIXO, M. 2004. Rediscovery of Hyophryne histrio (Anura, Microhylidae) in Atlantic Forest remnants of Bahia, northeastern Brazil. Phyllomedusa 3:7779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIXO, M. 2005. Diversidade de sapos e lagartos de serrapilheira numa paisagem fragmentada do Planalto Atlântico de São Paulo. PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
DIXO, M. & METZGER, J. P. Are corridors, fragment size and forest structure important for the conservation of leaf-litter lizards in a fragmented landscape? Oryx, in press.Google Scholar
DONNELLY, M. A., GUYER, C., JUTERBOCK, E. & ALFORD, R. A. 1994. Techniques for marking amphibians. Pp. 277284 in Heyer, W. R., Donnelly, M. A., Mcdiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L. C. & Foster, M. S. (eds.). Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
FARIA, D., PACIENCIA, M. L. B., DIXO, M., LAPS, R. R. & BAUMGARTEN, J. 2007. Ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats in forest fragments and shaded cacao plantations of two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:23352357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GARDNER, T. A., BARLOW, J. & PERES, C. A. 2007. Paradox, presumption and pitfalls in conservation biology: the importance of habitat change for amphibians and reptiles. Biological Conservation 138:166179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GASCON, C. 1993. Breeding-habitat use by five Amazonian frogs at forest edge. Biodiversity and Conservation 2:438444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GASCON, C., LOVEJOY, T. E., BIERREGAARD, R. O., MALCOM, J. R., STOUFFER, P. C., VASCONCELOS, H., LAURANCE, W. F., ZIMMERMAN, B., TOCHER, M. & BORGES, S. 1999. Matrix habitat and species persistence in tropical forest remnants. Biological Conservation 91:223229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARPER, K. A., MACDONALD, S. E., BURTON, P., CHEN, J., BROSOFSKY, K. D., SAUNDERS, S., EUSKIRCHEN, E. S., ROBERTS, D., JAITEH, M. & ESSEEN, P. A. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19:768782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEDGES, S. B., DUELLMAN, W. E. & HEINICKE, M. P. 2008. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 1737:1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JELLINEK, S., DRISCOLL, D. A. & KIRKPATRICK, J. B. 2004. Environmental and vegetation variables have a greater influence than habitat fragmentation in structuring lizard communities in remnant urban bushland. Austral Ecology 29:294304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEHTINEN, R. M., RAMANAMANJATO, J. & RAVELOARISON, J. G. 2003. Edge effects and extinction proneness in a herpetofauna from Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:13571370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARSH, D. M. & PEARMAN, P. B. 1997. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the abundance of two species of Leptodactylidae frogs in the Andean montane forest. Conservation Biology 11:13231328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MORI, S. A., BOOM, B. B. & PRANCE, G. T. 1981. Distribution patterns and conservation of eastern Brazilian coastal forest tree species. Brittonia 33:233245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURCIA, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forest: implication for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:5862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OLIVEIRA-FILHO, A. T. & FONTES, M. A. L. 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in southeastern Brazil and influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PARDINI, R. 2004. Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:25672586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PEARMAN, P. B. 1997. Correlates of amphibian diversity in an altered landscape of Amazonian Ecuador. Conservation Biology 11:12111225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RIES, L., FLETCHER, R. J. J., BATTIN, J. & SISK, T. D. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:491522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RODRIGUES, M. T., DIXO, M., PAVAN, D. & VERDADE, V. K. 2002. A new species of Leposoma (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) from the remnant Atlantic forests of the state of Bahia, Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo) 42:335350.Google Scholar
RODRIGUES, M. T., PELEGRINO, K. C. M., DIXO, M., VERDADE, V. K., PAVAN, D., ARGOLO, J. S. & SITE, J. W. 2007. A new genus of microteiid lizard from the Atlantic Forest of State of Bahia, Brazil, with a new generic name for Colobodactylus mentalis and a discussion of relationships among the Heterodactylini (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae). American Museum Novitates 3565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHLAEPFER, M. A. & GAVIN, T. A. 2001. Edge effects on lizards and frogs in tropical forest fragments. Conservation Biology 15:10791090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TOCHER, M. D., GASCON, C. & ZIMMERMAN, B. L. 1997. Fragmentation effects on a Central Amazonian frog community: a ten-year study. Pp. 124137 in Laurance, W. F. & Bierregaard, R. O. (eds.). Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
TORAL, E. C., FEINSINGER, P. & CRUMP, M. L. 2002. Frogs and cloud-forest edge in Ecuador. Conservation Biology 16:735744.Google Scholar
UETZ, P., GOLL, J. & HALLERMANN, J. 2007. Die TIGR-Reptiliendatenbank. Elaphe 15:2225.Google Scholar
URBINA-CARDONA, J. N., OLIVARES-PÉRES, M. & REYNOSO, V. H. 2006. Herpetofauna diversity and microenvironment correlates across a pasture-edge-interior ecotone in tropical rainforest fragments in Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve of Veracruz, Mexico. Biological Conservation 132:6175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VALLAN, D. 2000. Influence of forest fragmentation on amphibian diversity in the nature reserve of Ambohitantely, highland Madagascar. Biological Conservation 96:3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YOUNG, B. E., LIPS, K. R., REASER, J. K., IBANEZ, R., SALAS, A. W., CEDENO, J. R., COLOMA, L.A., RON, S., LA MARCA, E., MEYER, J. R., MUNOZ, A., BOLANOS, F., CHAVES, G. & ROMO, D. 2001. Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology 15:12131223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar