Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:41:50.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ant recolonization of rehabilitated bauxite mines at Trombetas, Pará, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Jonathan D. Majer
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Biology, Curtin University of Technology, Post Office Box U1987, Perth, WA 6001, Australia

Abstract

Ant species were sampled in three rainforest and 10 rehabilitated bauxite mine plots at Trombetas, in the tropical monsoonal region of Brazil. Rehabilitation ranged from 0 to 11 years in age and was mainly performed by planting mixed native forest tree species. One plot supported single-species blocks of Australian Eucalyptus and Acacia species. Two hundred and six ant species were recorded, of which 82 were exclusively found in the native vegetation, 54 were confined to the rehabilitation and 70 were found in both situations. In contrast with other studies, ant species richness in the Eucalyptus/Acacia plantation was as great as in the areas rehabilitated with native vegetation. The overall rate of return of ant species was considerably greater than in mines situated within subtropical regions of Brazil, Africa and Australia. However, if the greater richness of ants in the native vegetation at Trombetas was accounted for, the proportional return of the original ant fauna was not particularly rapid. The return of ant species slowed as the rehabilitated areas aged. In comparison with forest, the rehabilitation was characterized by proportionately more generalist species and fewer specialists, especially from the soil and litter layers. The full range of habitat requirements for the ant community has not been restored by the eleventh year of rehabilitation and further management may be required to enhance the degree of colonization. It is suggested that the findings for ants may apply to other components of the biota as well.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Andersen, A. N. 1990. The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: a review and a recipe. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 16:347357.Google Scholar
Besuchet, C., Burckhardt, D. H. & Lobl, I. 1987. The ‘Winkler/Moczarski’ eclector as an efficient extractor for fungus and litter Coleoptera. The Coleopterist's Bulletin 41:392394.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning 11:3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, S. P., Tobin, J. E. & Wilson, E. O. 1990. The ant community of a tropical lowland rainforest site in Peruvian Amazonia. Pp. 699700 in Veeresh, G. K., Mallick, B. & Viraktamath, C. A. (eds). Social insects and the environment. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Crawford, H. S., Hardy, D. M. & Abler, W. A. 1978. A survey of bird use of strip-mined areas in southern West Virginia. Pp. 241246 in Samuel, D. E. (ed.). Surface mining and fish/wildlife needs in Eastern United States. West Virginia University, Morgantown.Google Scholar
Eagleman, J. R. 1976. The visualisation of climate. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts. 227 pp.Google Scholar
Eden, M. J. 1990. Ecology and land management in Amazonia. Belhaven Press, London. 269 pp.Google Scholar
Fearnside, P. M. 1985a. Brazil's Amazon forest and the global carbon problem. Interciencia 10:179186.Google Scholar
Fearnside, P. M. 1985b. Environmental change and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Pp. 7089 in Hemming, J. (ed.). Change in the Amazon Basin, Vol 1, Man's impacts on forests and rivers. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Fosberg, F. R. 1972. Discussion. Pp. 387388 in Polunin, N. (ed.). The environmental future. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Fox, B. J. & Fox, M. D. 1986. Resilience of animal and plant communities to human disturbance. Pp. 3964 in Dell, B., Hopkins, A. J. M. & Lamont, B. B. (eds). Resilience in Mediterranean ecosystems. Dr W. Junk, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodland, R. J. A. 1985. Brazil's environmental progress in Amazonian development. Pp. 535 in Hemming, J. (ed.). Change in the Amazon Basin, Vol. 1, Man's impact on forests and rivers. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. 1990. The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 732 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, C. F. 1987. Amazonian rain forests: ecosystem disturbance and recovery. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langkamp, P. J. 1979. Reclamation terminology. Landline 1:67.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. 1983a. Recolonization by ants in rehabilitated open-cut mines in northern Australia. Reclamation and Revegetation Research 2:279298.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. 1983b. Ants: bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use and land conservation. Environmental Management 7:375383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, J. D. 1985. Recolonization by ants of rehabilitated mineral sand mines on North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, with particular reference to seed removal. Australian Journal of Ecology 10:3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, J. D. 1989a. Animals in primary succession. The role of fauna in reclaimed lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 547 pp.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. 1989b. Long-term colonization of fauna in reclaimed lands. Pp. 143174 in Majer, J. D. (ed.). Animals in primary succession. The role of fauna in reclaimed lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. 1992. Ant recolonization of rehabilitated bauxite mines of Poços de Caldas, Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8:97108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, J. D. & De Kock, A. E. 1992. Ant recolonization of sand mines near Richards Bay, South Africa: an evaluation of progress with rehabilitation. South African Journal of Science 88:3136.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. & Delabie, J. H. C. 1994. Comparison of the ant communities of annually inundated and terra firme forests at Trombetas in the Brazilian Amazon. Insectes Sociaux 41:343359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. 1988. Tropical forests and their species: going, going …? Pp. 2835 in Wilson, E. O. (ed.). Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Nepstad, D. C., Uhl, C. & Serrão, E. A. S. 1991. Recuperation of a degraded Amazonian landscape: forest recovery and agricultural restoration. Ambio 20:248255.Google Scholar
Nichols, O. G. & Bamford, M. J. 1985. Reptile and frog utilization of rehabilitated bauxite minesites and die-back affected sites in Western Australia's Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest. Biological Conservation 34:227249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, O. G. & Watkins, D. 1984. Bird utilization of rehabilitated bauxite mines in Western Australia. Biological Conservation 30:109131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27:379423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shattuck, S. O. 1992. Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dolichoderinae. Sociobiology 21:1181.Google Scholar
Stannard, L. J. 1967. The redispersal of Thysanoptera (Insecta, thrips) into spoiled strip mined lands in southern Illinois. Illinois State Academy of Science Transactions 60:130133.Google Scholar
Verhaagh, M. 1990. The Formicidae of the rain forest in Panguana, Peru: the most diverse local ant fauna ever recorded. Pp. 217218 in Veeresh, G. K., Mallick, B. & Viraktamath, C. A. (eds). Social insects and the environment. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Westman, W. E. 1986. Resilience: concepts and measures. Pp. 519 in Dell, B., Hopkins, A. J. M. & Lamont, B. B. (eds). Resilience in Mediterranean ecosystems. Dr W. Junk, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar