Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:02:30.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability of wooded patches in a South African nutrient-poor grassland: do nutrients, fire or herbivores limit their expansion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2007

Anja A. Mourik
Affiliation:
Resource Ecology Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands Stratigraphy and Paleontology Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands
Frank van Langevelde
Affiliation:
Resource Ecology Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Esther van Tellingen
Affiliation:
Resource Ecology Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Ignas M. A. Heitkönig
Affiliation:
Resource Ecology Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Ian Gaigher
Affiliation:
Lajuma Mountain Retreat, P.O. Box 522, Makhado (Louis Trichardt) 0920, South Africa

Abstract

Patches of wooded vegetation in nutrient-poor grassland characteristically contain high soil moisture and nutrient availability compared with surrounding grassland. These ‘islands of fertility’ appear stable in size, suggesting that tree recruitment at the patch boundary is limited. We hypothesize that tree establishment in adjacent grassland is limited by (1) competition for resources, (2) fire or (3) herbivory. In a South African grassland, we measured moisture availability and conducted a bioassay experiment to analyse whether soil nutrient limits tree recruitment at the patch boundary. We thus measured nutrient concentrations of maize plants grown in patch, boundary and grassland soil. To investigate whether browsing or fire affected tree seedlings at the patch boundary, we burned plots including patches, and used fences to exclude browsers. Neither soil moisture nor nutrient availability at the boundary differed from inside the patches, suggesting that tree recruitment at the boundary is not resource limited. Both fire and browsing combined caused a significantly lower tree seedling growth at the patch boundary, suggesting that these two factors can impede tree recruitment. The balance between positive feedback mechanisms facilitating tree recruitment, and the negative impact of fire and browsing can explain the apparent stability of these islands of fertility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)