Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:21:45.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mima mound microtopography and vegetation pattern in Kenyan savannas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

George W. Cox  and
Christopher G. Gakahu
George W. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-0057, USA
Christopher G. Gakahu
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nairobi, PO Box 30197, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Earth mounds are important determinants of vegetation pattern in savannas, acting as foci for establishment of woody plants. In the Kenya highlands, mounds formerly attributed to termites have recently been found to be Mima mounds produced by rhizomyid mole rats. We investigated Mima mounds on black cotton soils near Kenyatta International Airport and on brown clay soils between Nairobi and Thika. At Kenyatta Airport, mounds had loamier, more granular soils than intermounds, and contained small rocks that mole rats can move. At the site between Nairobi and Thika, mound soils were more friable, higher in pH, and lower in carbon than intermound soils. Data from this and other studies indicate that Mima mound soils are more favourable for plant growth than those of true termite mounds. Mound vegetation exhibited lower coverage of grasses and greater coverage by forbs, shrubs, and bare ground, a pattern indicative of intense grazing and soil disturbance. Acacias, absent from most mounds, were abundant in the zone bordering the mound. This pattern may reflect the favourability of mound soils, combined with the effects of high grazing pressure. Future studies of savanna vegetation should distinguish between termite mounds and Mima mounds.

Keywords

Acacia drepanolobiumAcacia tortilisKenyaMima moundsrhizomyid mole ratssavannastermitaria
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 23 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Allgood, F. P. & Gray, F. 1974. An ecological interpretation for the small mounds in landscapes of eastern Oklahoma. Journal of Environmental Quality 3:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arshad, M. A. 1981. Physical and chemical properties of termite mounds of two species of Macro-termes (Isoptera: Termitidae) and the surrounding soils of the semiarid savanna of Kenya. Soil Science 132:161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arshad, M. A. 1982. Influence of the termite Macrotermes michaelseni (Sjost) on soil fertility and vegetation in a semi-arid savannah ecosystem. Agro-Ecosystems 8:47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughey, A. S. 1965. Evolution of termite mounds in central Africa. Pp. 333–341 in Proceedings of the Central African Medical Congress, Lusaka, Northern Rhodesia, 26–30 08, 1963. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
BransonF. A, Miller, R. F. F. A, Miller, R. F. & McQueen, J. S. 1965. Plant communities and soil moisture relationships near Denver, Colorado. Ecology 46:311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, R. & McCann, M. T. 1982. Laboratory and field manual of ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia. 269 pp.Google Scholar
BRIGGS, D. 1977. Soils. Butterworths, London. 192 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, P. J. & Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G. W. 1984. Mounds of mystery. Natural History 93:36–45.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. & Gakahu, C. G. 1983. Mima mounds in the Kenya highlands: significance for the Dalquest-Scheffer hypothesis. Oecologia 57:170–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, W. A. 1963. Geology of the North Machakos-Thika area. Report No. 59, Geological Survey of Kenya, Nairobi. 43 pp.Google Scholar
Fanshawe, D. B. 1968. The vegetation of Zambian termitaria. Kirkia 6:169–179.Google Scholar
Fries, R. E. & Fries, T. C. E. 1948. Phytosociological researches on Mt. Kenya and Mt. Aberdare, British East Africa. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar 25(5):1–83.Google Scholar
Gakahu, C. G. & Cox, G. W. 1984. The occurrence and origin of Mima mound terrain in Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 22:31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, P. E., Trump, E. C. & D.Wateridge, L. E. Wateridge, L. E. 1964. Termitaria and vegetation patterns on the Loita Plains of Kenya. Journal of Ecology 52:367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, P. R. 1955. A chemical and physical study of the soils of termite mounds in East Africa. Journal of Ecology 43:449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. & Gartlan, J. S. 1965. The flora and fauna of Lolui Island, Lake Victoria: a study of vegetation, men and monkeys. Journal of Ecology 53:573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, J. U. M. & Sale, J. B. 1971. Burrowing and burrow patterns of East African mole-rats Tachy-oryctes, Heliophobius, and Heterocephalus. Journal of Zoology, London 163:451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. M. & Morrison, M. E. S. 1974. East African vegetation. Longman, London. xvii + 257 pp.Google Scholar
Lorio, P. L Jr., & Hodges, J. D. 1971. Microrelief, soil water regime, and loblolly pine growth on a wet, mounded site. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 35:795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaisse, F. 1978. High termitaria. Pp. 1281–1300 in Werger, M. J. A. (ed.). Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa. Monographiae Biologicae, v. 31. W. Junk, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnies, W. J. 1960. Effect of Mima-type microrelief on herbage production of five seeded grasses in western Colorado. Journal of Range Management 13:231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mielke, H. W. 1977. Mound building by pocket gophers (Geomyidae): their impact on soils and vegetation in North America. Journal of Biogeography 4:171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojany, F. F. 1968. The mound topography of the Thika and Athi Plains of Kenya: a problem of origin. Erdkunde 22:269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, D. E. 1977. The distribution and abundance of large termite mounds in Uganda. Journal of Applied Ecology 14:465–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, D. J. & Gwynne, M. D. 1977. Rangeland management and ecology in East Africa. Hodderand Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
Pullan, R. A. 1979. Termite hills in Africa: their characteristics and evolution. Catena 6:267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, R. D. 1982. A correction of Cole's C7 and Hurlbert's C8 coefficients of interspecific association. Ecology 63:1605–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retzer, J. L. 1946. Morphology and origin of some California mounds. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 10:360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. M. 1963. The soils of the Nairobi-Thika-Yatta-Machakos area. Department of Agriculture, Kenya. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Stephen, I., Bellis, E. & Muir, A. 1956. Gilgai phenomena in tropical black clays of Kenya. Journal of Soil Science 7:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. R. M. 1967. Analysis of plant epidermis in faeces, a technique of studying the food preferences of grazing herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 4:83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troll, C. 1936. Termiten-savannen. Pp. 275–313 in Louis, H. & Panzer, W. (eds). Landerkundliche forschung. J. Engelhorns Nachf., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar