Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:37:14.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litter production in successional forests of southern Bahia, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2022

Janaine Isabela da Silva Rocha Open the ORCID record for Janaine Isabela da Silva Rocha [Opens in a new window] ,
Luiz Fernando Silva Magnago  and
Daniel Piotto
Janaine Isabela da Silva Rocha*
Affiliation:
Programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (UESC), Rodovia Ilhéus-Itabuna, Km. 16. Salobrinho, 42662-900, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil
Luiz Fernando Silva Magnago
Affiliation:
Centro de Formação em Ciências Agroflorestais, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil
Daniel Piotto
Affiliation:
Centro de Formação em Ciências Agroflorestais, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Janaine Isabela da Silva Rocha, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Litter production plays an important role in the functioning of the ecosystem, providing several ecosystem services, such as nutrients cycling and carbon storage. We studied litter production patterns and its relationship with forest structure over a chronosequence of secondary forests in southern Bahia, Brazil. In the study area, 15 pairs of mature and secondary forest were used, in a chronological sequence, being 10, 25 and 40-year-old secondary forests and mature forests. Plots were created for the collection of aboveground biomass data, and within these plots, litter collectors were installed and monitored for 1 year. The results showed that litter production was lower in 10-year-old secondary forests when compared with older forests. On the other hand, in the 10-year-old forests, annual litter production represents 47.8% of the stored biomass, while in mature forests annual litter production represents only 4%. We found that structural variables (basal area, number of stems and canopy opening) influence significantly litter production, as well as litter as percentage of forest biomass. The study emphasizes the importance of biomass production through litterfall in regenerating tropical forests, and its importance for carbon storage and for the maintenance of ecosystem services.

Keywords

carbonecosystem functioningregenerationsecondary successionsuccessionaltropical forests
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 2022 , pp. 377 - 385
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, PB, Salguero-Gómez, R, Compagnoni, A, Hsu, JS, Ray-Mukherjee, J, Mbeau-Ache, C and Franco, M (2013) Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. PNAS 111, 740–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguiar, APD, Vieira, ICG, Assis, TO, Dalla-Nora, EL, Toledo, PM, Santos-Junior, RAO, Batistella, M, Coelho, AS, Savaget, EK, Aragão, REOC, Nobre, CA and Ometto, JPH (2016) Land use change emission scenarios: anticipating a forest transition process in the Brazilian Amazon. Global Change Biology 22, 1821–1840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alves, LF, Vieira, SA, Scaranello, MA, Camargo, PB, Santos, FAMC, Joly, A and Martinelli, LA (2010) Forest structure and live aboveground biomass variation along an elevational gradient of tropical Atlantic moist forest (Brazil). Forest Ecological Management 260, 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amatangelo, KL, Dukes, JS and Field, CB (2008) Responses of a California annual grassland to litter manipulation. Journal of Vegetation Science 19, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, JY, Han, SH, Youn, WB, Lee, SI, Rahman, A, Dao, HTT, Seo, JM, Aung, A, Choi, H, Hyun, HJ and Park, BB (2019) Comparison of litterfall production in three forest types in Jeju Island, South Korea. Journal of Forestry Research 31, 945–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J, Gardner, TA, Ferreira, LV and Peres, CA (2007) Litter fall and decomposition in primary, secondary and plantation forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecological Management 247, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, B and Mcclaugherty, C (2014) Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond-Lamberty, B and Thomson, A (2010) Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464, 579–582. doi: 10.1038/nature08930 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S and Lugo, AE (1990) Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, MA, Brown, S, Helmer, EH and Baumgardner, GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests, Oecologia, 111, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camargo, M, Giarrizzo, T and Jesus, AJS (2015) Effect of seasonal flooding cycle on litterfall production in alluvial rainforest on the middle Xingu River (Amazon basin, Brazil). Brazilian Journal Biology 75, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, AL, Bertilier, MB and Larreguy, C (2008) Leaf litter fall, fine root production, and decomposition in shrub lands with different canopy structure induced by grazing in the Pantagonian Monte, Argentina. Plant and Soil 311, 39–50. doi: 10.100711104-008-9655-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, S, Rai, P, Vineeta, V, Pala, NA and Shukla, G (2019) Litter Production and Decomposition in Tropical Forest. In Bhadouria R, Tripathi S, Srivastava P, Singh P (eds), Handbook of research on the conservation and restoration of tropical dry forests, India: IGI Global Publisher. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0014-9-ch010 Google Scholar
Chave, J, David, C, Steven, J, Simon, LL, Nathan, GS and Amy, EZ (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters 12, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chave, J, Réjou-Méchain, M, Búrquez, A, Chidumayo, E, Colgan, MS, Delitti, WBC, Duque, A, Eid, T, Fearnside, PM, Goodman, MHRC, Martínez-Yrízar, A, Mugasha, WA, Muller-Landau, HC, Mencuccini, M, Nelson, BW, Ngomanda, A, Nogueira, EM, Ortiz-Malavassi, E, Pélissier, R, Ploton, P, Ryan, CM, Saldarriaga, JG and Vieilledent, G (2014) Improved pantropical allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical forests. Global Change Biology 72, 763–768. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12629 Google Scholar
Cornwell, WK, Cornelissen, JHC, Amatangelo, K, Dorrepaal, E, Eviner, VT, Godoy, O, Hobbie, SE, Hoorens, B, Kurokawa, H, Pérez-Harguindeguy, N, Quested, HM, Santiago, LS, Wardle, DA, Wright, IJ, Aerts, R, Allison, SD, Van Bodegom, P, Brovkin, V, Chatain, A, Callaghan, TV, Díaz, S, Garnier, E, Gurvich, DE, Kazakou, E, Klein, JA, Read, J, Reich, PB, Soudzilovskaia, NA, Vaieretti, MV and Westoby, M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letters 11, 1065–1071. http://dxdoi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortez, J, Garnier, E, Pérez-Harguindeguy, N, Debussche, M and Gillon, D (2007) Plant traits, litter quality and decomposition in a Mediterranean old-field succession. Plant Soil 296, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, D, Hall, JS, Berlyn, GP, Ashton, MS and van Breugel, M (2015) Changing gears during succession: shifting functional strategies in young tropical secondary forests. Oecologia 179, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devi, AF and Garkoti, SC (2013) Variation in evergreen and deciduous species leaf phenology in Assam, India. Trees 27, 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-013-0850-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberg, D, Trogisch, S, Huang, Y, He, JS and Bruelheide, H (2014) Shifts in community leaf functional traits are related to litter decomposition along a secondary forest succession series in subtropical China. Journal Plant Ecology 8, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, N, Milcu, A, Sabais, ACW, Bessler, H, Weigelt, A, Engels, C and Scheu, S (2009) Plant community impacts on the structure of earthworm communities depend on season and change with time. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41, 2430–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewel, JJ (1976) Litter fall and leaf decomposition in a tropical forest succession in eastern Guatemala. Journal of Ecology 64, 293−308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facelli, JM and Pickett, STA (1991) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. The Botanical Review 57, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, E, Cortez, J, Billes, G, Navas, M, Roumet, C, Debussche, M, Laurent, G, Blanchard, A, Aubry, D, Bellmann, A, Neill, C and Toussaint, J (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85, 2630–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guendehou, GHS, Liski, J, Tuomi, M, Moudachirou, M, Sinsin, B and Makipaa, R (2014) Decomposition and changes in chemical composition of leaf litter of five dominant tree species in a West African tropical forest. Tropical Ecology 55, 207–220.Google Scholar
Houghton, RA, Hall, F and Goetz, SJ (2009) Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, BG, Peltzer, DA and Wardle, DA (2013) Are functional traits and litter decomposability coordinated across leaves, twigs and wood? A test using temperate rainforest tree species. Oikos 122, 1131–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, MP and Mohan, H (2017) Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energy. Ecology & Environment 2, 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunhamu, TK, Kumar, BM and Viswanath, S (2009) Does thinning affect litterfall, litterdecomposition, and associated nutrient release in Acacia mangiumstands of Kerala inpeninsular India? Canadian Journal Forest Research 39, 792–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuruvilla, T, Jijeesh, CM and Seethalakshm, KK (2016) Litter production and decomposition dynamics of a rare and endemic bamboo species Munrochloa ritcheyi of Western Ghats, India. Tropical Ecology 57, 601–606.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB, Christensen, RHB (2017). “lmer test package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León, JD and Osorio, NW (2014) Role of litter turnover in soil quality in tropical degraded lands of Colombia. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/693981 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y and Ye, Y (2014) Dynamics of decomposition and nutrient release of leaf litter in Kandelia obovata mangrove forests with different ages in Jiulongjiang Estuary, China. Ecological Engineering 73, 454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, MD and Schowalter, TD (2012) Plant science in forest canopies – the first 30 years of advances and challenges (1980–2010). New Phytologist 194, 12–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04076.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majila, BS, Joshi, GC and Kala, CP (2005) Patterns in litter fall and litter decomposition along an altitudinal gradient in the Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary, Central Himalaya. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 12, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagnini, F and Jordan, CF (2002) Nutrient recycling. In Guariguata, MR and Kattan, GH (eds), Ecology and conservation of neotropical forests. Cartago: Libro Universitario Regional, pp. 167–191.Google Scholar
Nickmans, H, Jonarda, M, Verheyen, J and Ponette, Q (2019) Modelling leaf dispersal and nutrient return in tree species mixtures. Forest Ecology and Management 436, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostertag, R, Marın-Spiotta, E, Silver, WL and Schulten, J (2008) Litterfall and decomposition in relation to soil carbon pools along a secondary forest chronosequence in Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 11, 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y, Birdsey, RA, Fang, J, Houghton, R, Kauppi, PE, Kurz, WA, Phillips, OL, Shvidenko, A, Lewis, SL, Canadell, JG, Ciais, P, Jackson, RB, Pacala, SW, Mcguire, AD, Piao, S, Rautiainen, A, Sitch, S and Hayes, D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, RR, Sharma, G, Tripathi, SK and Singh, AK (2007) Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a subtropical natural oak forest and managed plantation in northeastern India. Forest Ecology Management 240, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patoine, G, Thakur, MP, Friese, J, Nock, C, Hönig, L, Haase, J, Scherer-Lorenzen, M and Eisenhauer, N (2017) Plant litter functional diversity effects on litter mass loss depend on the macro-detritivore Community. Pedobiologia – Journal of Soil Ecology 65, 29–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Parton, W, Silver, WL, Burke, IC, Grassens, L, Harmom, ME, Currie, WS, King, JY, Adair, EC, Brandt, LA, Hart, SC and Fasth, B (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315, 361–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piotto, D, Montagnini, F, Thomas, W, Ashton, M and Oliver, C (2009) Forest recovery after Swidden cultivation across a 40-year chronosequence in the Atlantic forest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Plant Ecology 205, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggiani, F (2012) Nutrient cycling in Brazilian forestsl. In Martins, SV (ed), Ecologia de Florestas Tropicais do Brasil. Viçosa: Editora UFV, pp. 175–251.Google Scholar
Poorter, L and Bongers, F (2006) Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87, 1733–1743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rawat, N, Nautiyal, BP and Nautiyal, MC (2010) Litter decomposition rate and nutrient release from different litter forms in a Himalayan alpine ecosystem. The Environmentalist 30, 279–288. doi: 10.100710669-010-9275-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, M, Condit, R, Crawley, M, Pacala, S and Tilman, D (2001) Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science, 293, 650–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, PB (2014) The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, PB, Tjoelker, MG, Pregitzer, KS, Wright, IJ, Oleksyn, J and Machado, JL (2008) Scaling of respiration to nitrogen in leaves, stems, and roots of higher land plants. Ecology Letters 11, 793–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozendaal, DMA and Chazdon, RL (2015) Demographic drivers of tree biomass change during secondary succession in northeastern Costa Rica. Ecological Society of America 25, 506–516.Google ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Silva, S, De Jong, BHJ, Aryal, DR, Huerta-Lwanga, E and Mendoza-Vega, J (2018) Trends in leaf traits, litter dynamics and associated nutrient cycling along a secondary successional chronosequence of semi-evergreen tropical forest in South-Eastern Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 34, 364–377. doi: 10.1017/S0266467418000366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, FM, Terra, G, Chaer, GM, Monte, MA (2018) Modeling the height–diameter relationship and volume of young African mahoganies established in successional agroforestry systems in northeastern Brazil. New For. doi: 10.1007/s11056-018-9665-1 Google Scholar
Sayer, EJ (2006) Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter in the functioning of forest ecosystems, Biology Review 81, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayer, EJ, Powers, JS and Tanner, EVJ (2007) Increased litterfall in tropical forests boosts the transfer of soil CO2 to the atmosphere. PLoS ONE 2, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, MV, Truby, P, Marafiga, JM, Viera, M and Szymczak, DA (2011) Predominant species in litter deposition in a seasonal deciduous forest fragment in Rio Grande do Sul. Ciência Florestal 21, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, B, Dietrich, C, Cesarz, S, Scherer-Lorenzen, M, Auge, H, Schulz, E and Eisenhauer, N (2015) Non-significant tree diversity but significant identity effects on earthworm communities in three tree diversity experiments. European Journal of Soil Biology 67, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, WL, Hall, SJ and González, G (2014) Differential effects of canopy trimming and litter deposition on litterfall and nutrient dynamics in a wet subtropical forest. Forest Ecology Management 332, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, WW (2003) Natural vegetation types in southern Bahia. In Prado, PI, Landau, EC, Moura, RT, Pinto, LPS, Fonseca, GAB and Alger, K (orgs), Biodiversity Corridor of the Atlantic Forest of Southern Bahia. Ilhéus: Publicação em CD-ROM, IESB/CI/CABS/UFMG/UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Tripathi, SK, Sumida, A, Shibata, H, Ono, K, Uemura, S, Kodama, Y and Hara, T (2006) Leaf litterfall and decomposition of different above- and belowground parts of birch (Betula ermanii) trees and dwarf bamboo (Sasa kurilensis) shrubs in a young secondary forest in Northern Japan. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDOE (2010) Climate Research Roadmap Workshop: Summary Report. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science.Google Scholar
van Breugel, M, Martınez-Ramos, M and Bongers, F (2006) Community dynamics during early secondary succession in Mexican tropical rain forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22, 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, MM, Pivello, VR, Meirelles, ST and Metzger, JP (2007) Litter production in secondary Atlantic forest in a fragmented landscape (Ibiúna, SP): importance of the edge and size of the fragments. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 30, 521–532.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P and Sanford, RL (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17, 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, DA, Bardgett, RD, Klironomos, JN, Setalã, H, van der Putten, WH and Wall, DH (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304, 1629–1633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werneck, MS, Pedralli, G and Gieseke, LF (2001) Litter production in three stretches of a semideciduous forest with different degrees of disturbance in the Ecological Station of Tripuí, Ouro Preto, MG. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 24, 195–198.Google Scholar
Zanne, AE, Lopez-Gonzalez, G, Coomes, DA, Ilic, J, Jansen, S, Lewis, SL, Miller, RB, Swenson, NG, Wiemann, MC and Chave, J (2009) Global Wood Density Database. Dryad Identifier. http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.235 Google Scholar
Zhou, G, Guan, L, Wei, X, Zhang, D, Zhang, Q, Yan, J, Wen, D, Liu, D, Liu, S, Huang, Z, Kong, G, Mo, J and Yu, Q (2007) Litterfall production along successional and altitudinal gradients of subtropical monsoon evergreen broadleaved forests in Guangdong, China. Plant Ecology 188, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, G, Shan Xu, Ciais P, Manzoni, S, Fang, J, Yu, G, Tang, X, Zhou, P, Wang, W, Yan, J, Wang, G, Ma, K, Li, S, Du, S, Han, S, Ma, Y, Zhang, D, Liu, J, Liu, S, Chu, G, Zhang, Q, Li, Y, Huang, W, Ren, H, Lu, X and Chen, X (2019) Climate and litter C/N ratio constrain soil organic carbon accumulation. National Science Review 6, 746–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, NJ, Saveliev, AA, Smith, GM (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York: Statistics for Biology and Health.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H, Ciais, P, Chave, J, Huang, Y, Ballantyne, AP, Yu, K, Berzaghi, F and Wigneron, JP (2021) Coarse woody debris are buffering mortality-induced carbon losses to the atmosphere in tropical forests. Environmental Research Letters 16, 011006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar