Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:53:50.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Levels of allozyme diversity in populations of uncommon Neotropical tree species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. L. Hamrick
Affiliation:
Departments of Botany and Genetics, University of Georgia, Athena, Ga. 30602, USA
Darlyne A. Murawski
Affiliation:
Departments of Botany and Genetics, University of Georgia, Athena, Ga. 30602, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Black, G. A., Dobzhansky, T. & Pavan, C. 1950. Some aitempts to estimate species diversity and population density of trees in Amazonian forests. Botanical Gazette 11:413425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theoretical Population Biology 15:142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. A. 1966. The structure of the tropical rain forest and speciation in the humid tropics. Journal of Ecology 54:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Progress in Phytochemistry 7:146.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. & Godt, M. J. W. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pp. 43–63 in Brown, A. H. D., Clcgg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. & Weir, B. S. (eds). Plant population genetics, breeding andgermplasm resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 449 pp.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L., Linhart, Y. B. & Mitton, J. B. 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically-delectable genetic variation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:173200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. & Loveless, M. D. 1986. The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of plant populations. Pp. 211–223 in Estrada, A. & Fleming, T. H. (eds). Frugivores and seed dispersal. Junk Publ, The Hague, Netherlands. 392 ppGoogle Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. & Loveless, M. D. 1989. The genetic structure of tropical tree populations: Associations with reproductive biology. Pp. 129–146 in Bock, J. H. & Linhart, Y. B. (eds). The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA. 600 pp.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. & Murawski, D. A. 1990. The breeding structure of tropical tree populations. Plant Species Biology. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. 1983. Diversity of canopy trees in a neotropical forest and implications for conservation. Pp. 25–41 in Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. C. & Chadwick, A. C. (eds). Tropical rainforest: ecology and management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Karron, J. D. 1987. A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self–compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evolutionary Ecology 1:4758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karron, J. D., Linhart, Y. B., Chaulk, C. A. & Robertson, C. A. 1988. Genetic structure of populations of geographically restricted and widespread species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 75:11141119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveless, M. D. & Hamrick, J. L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:6595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveless, M. D. & Hamrick, J. L. 1987. Distribucion dc la variacion genelica en especies arboreas tropicalcs. Revista de Biologia Tropical 35:165176.Google Scholar
Mitton, J. B., Linhart, Y. B., Sturgeon, B. K. & Hamrick, J. L. 1979. Allozyme polymorphism detected in mature needle tissue of Ponderosa pine. Journal of Heredity 70:8689.Google Scholar
Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed