Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T07:58:16.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2003

Oliver L. Phillips
Affiliation:
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Rodolfo Vásquez Martínez
Affiliation:
Proyecto Flora del Perú, Oxapampa, Peru
Percy Núñez Vargas
Affiliation:
Biodiversidad Amazónico, Cusco, Peru Herbario Vargas, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Peru
Abel Lorenzo Monteagudo
Affiliation:
Proyecto Flora del Perú, Oxapampa, Peru Herbario Vargas, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Peru Present address: Jardin Botanico de Missouri, Oxapampa, Peru
Maria-Elena Chuspe Zans
Affiliation:
Herbario Vargas, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Peru
Washington Galiano Sánchez
Affiliation:
Herbario Vargas, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Peru
Antonio Peña Cruz
Affiliation:
Proyecto Flora del Perú, Oxapampa, Peru
Martin Timaná
Affiliation:
Proyecto Flora del Perú, Oxapampa, Peru Present address: Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, USA
Markku Yli-Halla
Affiliation:
MTT, Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen, Finland
Sam Rose
Affiliation:
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Present address: Volunteer Services Overseas, London, UK

Abstract

The tropical flora remains chronically understudied and the lack of floristic understanding hampers ecological research and its application for large-scale conservation planning. Given scarce resources and the scale of the challenge there is a need to maximize the efficiency of both sampling strategies and sampling units, yet there is little information on the relative efficiency of different approaches to floristic assessment in tropical forests. This paper is the first attempt to address this gap. We repeatedly sampled forests in two regions of Amazonia using the two most widely used plot-based protocols of floristic sampling, and compared their performance in terms of the quantity of floristic knowledge and ecological insight gained scaled to the field effort required. Specifically, the methods are assessed first in terms of the number of person-days required to complete each sample (‘effort’), secondly by the total gain in the quantity of floristic information that each unit of effort provides (‘crude inventory efficiency’), and thirdly in terms of the floristic information gained as a proportion of the target species pool (‘proportional inventory efficiency’). Finally, we compare the methods in terms of their efficiency in identifying different ecological patterns within the data (‘ecological efficiency’) while controlling for effort. There are large and consistent differences in the performance of the two methods. The disparity is maintained even after accounting for regional and site-level variation in forest species richness, tree density and the number of field assistants. We interpret our results in the context of selecting the appropriate method for particular research purposes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)