Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:43:20.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of ground-dwelling small mammal communities in primary and secondary tropical rainforests in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

De-Lin Wu
Affiliation:
Kunming Institute of Ecology, Academia Sinica, Kunming 650223, China
Jia Luo
Affiliation:
School of Biological Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
Barry J. Fox
Affiliation:
School of Biological Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia

Abstract

Trapping was conducted in primary and secondary forests to investigate the effects of past logging on small mammal communities. Thirteen I-ha sites were snap-trapped for three consecutive days in tropical monsoon rainforest in Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve, southern China. A total of 3900 trap-days yielded 198 captures, of which 118 were in the primary forest and 80 in the secondary forest. A total of 12 ground-dwelling species (eight Rodentia, Muridae; three Insectivora, Soricidae; one Insectivora, Erinaceidae) were caught, five (all Rodentia, Muridae) occurred in the primary forest and 11 in the secondary forest. The most abundant species was Niviventer confucianus, accounting for 62% and 39% of the total captures in the primary and the secondary forests, respectively. In the secondary forest the mean abundances of the two dominant species, N. confucianus and Maxomys surifer, were reduced, and a non-commensal form of Rattus rattus disappeared, but N. fulvescens showed no change while Mus pahari increased. The seven species which occurred only in secondary forest had very low abundance. Overall, the multivariate Mantel test showed the two communities to be significantly different. After logging, species diversity increased, and the two dominant species had increased body mass and their mean abundance decreased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Fleming, T. H. 1975. The role of small mammals in tropical ecosystems. Pp. 269298 in Golley, F. B., Petrusewicz, K. & Tyszkowski, L. (eds). Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge University, London. 451 pp.Google Scholar
Fonseca, G. A. B. 1989. Small mammal species diversity in Brazilian tropical primary and secondary forests of different sizes. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 6:381422.Google Scholar
Fox, B. J. & Fox, M. D. 1984. Small-mammal recolonization of open-forest following sand-mining. Australian Journal of Ecology 9:241252.Google Scholar
Fox, B. J. & Mckay, G. M. 1981. Small mammal response to pyric successional changes in eucalypt forest. Australian Journal of Ecology 6:2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyawe, J. G. 1989. The ecology of small mammals in Ogba Forest Reserve, Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5:5164.Google Scholar
Janion, S. M., Ryszkowski, L. & Wierzbowska, T. 1968. Estimate of number of rodents with variable probability of capture. Acta Theriologica 13:285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, G. L. Jr. 1990. Patterns of initial small mammal community change after clearcutting of temperate North American forests. Oikos 59:313320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J. 1993. A study on the diets of Rattus lutreolus and Pseudomys gracilicaudatus (Rodentia: Muridae) and an investigation of methodology in mammalian dietary studies. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Luo, J. & Fox, B. J. 1994. Diet of the easten chestnut mouse (Pseudomys gracilicaudatus): II. Seasonal and successional patterns. Wildlife Research 21:419431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantel, N. A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Canter Research 27:209220.Google Scholar
Mantel, N. A. & Valand, R. S. 1970. A technique for nonparametric multivariate analysis. Biometrics 26:547558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mares, M. A., Ernest, K. A. & Gettinger, D. D. 1986. Small mammal community structure and composition in the Cerrado Province of central Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2:289300.Google Scholar
Martell, A. M. 1983. Changes in small mammal communities after logging in north-central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61:970980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monthey, R. W. & Soutiere, E. C. 1985. Responses of small mammals to forest harvesting in northern Maine. Canadian Field-Naturalists 99:1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo. 312 pp.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. G. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688.Google Scholar
Smith, M. H., Gardner, R. H., Gentry, J. B., Kaufman, D. W. & O'Farrel, M. H. 1975. Density estimations of small mammal populations. Pp. 2553 in Golley, F. B., Petrusewicz, K. & Tyszkowski, L. (eds). Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, London. 451 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, S. & Rabinowitz, A. 1992. The small-mammal community of a dry-tropical forest in central Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8:5771.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. 1993. Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference. Smithsonian Institute Press, London.Google Scholar
Wu, D.-L. & Deng, X.-F. 1988. The community structure of myomorpha rodents in the tropical and subtropical mountainous forests in Yunnan Province: I. Species diversity, relative abundance, density and biomass. Acta Theriologica Sinica 8:2532 (in Chinese, with English summary).Google Scholar
Wu, D.-L. & Luo, C.-C. 1993. Effects of human activity on community structure of small mammals in Ailao Mountain. Zoological Research 14:4248 (in Chinese, with English summary).Google Scholar
Yang, A.-P. & Fang, L.-X. 1988. Phallic morphology of 13 species of the family Muridae from China, with comments on its taxonomic significance. Acta Theriologica Sinica 8:275287 (in Chinese, with English summary).Google Scholar