Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:29:37.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Burrow systems of mole-rats as refuges for frogs in the Miombo woodlands of south-east Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2015

Jan Šklíba ,
Miloslav Jirků  and
Radim Šumbera
Jan Šklíba*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Miloslav Jirků
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Radim Šumbera
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Frogs are known to occasionally utilize the burrow systems of subterranean rodents, but this phenomenon has previously attracted little attention. We recorded frogs in burrows and in/under the molehills of three African mole-rat species (Bathyergidae, Rodentia) during burrow system mapping in Malawi and Zambia during the dry season. Eight frog species were detected. The most abundant of them, Kassina senegalensis, was found in large numbers in active Ansell's mole-rat nest areas, obviously tolerated by the hosts. We speculate that in areas with prolonged dry seasons mole-rats may increase anuran abundances and diversity.

Keywords

aestivationAnuraBathyergidaecommensalismecosystem engineerMalawisubterranean rodentZambia
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 158 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ALTUNA, C. 1991. Microclima de cuevas y comportamientos de homeostasis en una población del grupo Ctenomys pearsomi del Uruguay (Rodentia, Octodontidae). Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay 6:35–46.Google Scholar
CHANNING, A. 2001. Amphibians of Central and Southern Africa. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 470 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEJEAN, A. & AMIET, J. L. 1992. Un cas de myrmécophilie inattendu: la cohabitation de l'anoure Kassina senegalensis avec la fourmi Megaponera foetans. Alytes 10:31–36.Google Scholar
ELOFF, G. 1952. Sielkundige aangepastheid van die mol aan onderaardse leefwyse en sielkundige konvergensie. Tydskrif vir Wetenskap en Kuns 12:210–225.Google Scholar
FRANZ, R., ASHTON, R. E. & TIMMERMAN, W. W. 1995. Behavior and movements of certain small sandhill amphibians and reptiles in response to drift fences. Nongame Wildlife Program Project GFC-87-023. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
HICKMAN, G. C. 1979. Burrow structure of the bathyergid Cryptomys hottentotus in Natal, South Africa. Zeitschrift für Saugetierkunde 44:153–162.Google Scholar
JARVIS, J. U. M. & SALE, J. B. 1971. Burrowing and burrow patterns of East African mole-rats Tachyoryctes, Heliophobius and Heterocephalus. Journal of Zoology 163:451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KINGDON, J. 1984. East African mammals: an atlas of evolution in Africa, volume 2, part B. Hares and rodents. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 371 pp.Google Scholar
KINLAW, A. E. 2006. Burrows of semi-fossorial vertebrates in upland communities of central Florida: their architecture, dispersion and ecological consequences. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, USA.Google Scholar
LOVERIDGE, J. P. 1976. Strategies of water conservation in South African frogs. Zoologica Africana 11:319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MERCURIO, V., BÖHME, W. & STREIT, B. 2009. Reproductive diversity of Malawian anurans. Herpetology Notes 2:175–183.Google Scholar
NEVO, E. 1999. Mosaic evolution of subterranean mammals: regression, progression and global convergence. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 512 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RÖDEL, M. O., BREDE, C., HIRSCHFELD, M., SCHMITT, T., FAVREAU, P., STÖCKLIN, R., WUNDER, C. & MEBS, D. 2013. Chemical camouflage – a frog's strategy to co-exist with aggressive ants. PLoS ONE 8: e81950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RUMBO, M. F. & CACCIALI, P. 2008. Nota sobre la fauna herpetológica en cuevas de Ctenomys pearsoni (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae). Kempffiana 4:13–17.Google Scholar
SCHIØTZ, A. 1999. Treefrogs of Africa. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main. 350 pp.Google Scholar
ŠKLÍBA, J., ŠUMBERA, R., CHITAUKALI, W. N. & BURDA, H. 2009. Home-range dynamics in a solitary subterranean rodent. Ethology 115:217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ŠKLÍBA, J., MAZOCH, V., PATZENHAUEROVÁ, H., HROUZKOVÁ, E., LÖVY, M., KOTT, O. & ŠUMBERA, R. 2012. A maze-lover's dream: burrow architecture, natural history and habitat characteristics of Ansell's mole-rat (Fukomys anselli). Mammalian Biology 77:420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ŠUMBERA, R., KUBOVÁ, J., CHITAUKALI, W. N. & BURDA, H. 2004. Microclimatic stability in burrows of an Afrotropical solitary bathyergid rodent, the silvery mole-rat (Heliophobius argenteocinereus). Journal of Zoology 263:409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ŠUMBERA, R., ŠKLÍBA, J., ELICHOVÁ, M., CHITAUKALI, W. N. & BURDA, H. 2008. Natural history and burrow system architecture of the silvery mole-rat from Brachystegia woodland. Journal of Zoology 274:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ŠUMBERA, R., MAZOCH, V., PATZENHAUEROVÁ, H., LÖVY, M., ŠKLÍBA, J., BRYJA, J. & BURDA, H. 2012. Burrow architecture, family composition and habitat characteristics of the largest social African mole-rat: the giant mole-rat constructs really giant burrow systems. Acta Theriologica 57:121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAUGHAN, T. A. 1961. Vertebrates inhabiting pocket gopher burrows in Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy 42:171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WANG, H., LI, R., XI, X., MENG, T., ZHOU, M., WANG, L., ZHANG, Y., CHEN, T. & SHAW, C. 2013. Senegalin: a novel antimicrobial/myotropic hexadecapeptide from the skin secretion of the African running frog, Kassina senegalensis. Amino Acids 44:1347–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WELDON, P. J. & CARROLL, J. F. 2007. Vertrbrate chemical defense: secreted and topically acquired deterrents of arthropods. Pp. 47–76 in Debboun, M., Frances, S. P. & Strickman, D. (eds.). Insect repellents. Principles, methods, and uses. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar