Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:56:18.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Association between mites and leaf domatia: evidence from Bangladesh, South Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Shelley A. Rozario
Shelley A. Rozario
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mites use the leaf domatia of many woody plant species in Australasia and North America. Different types of leaf domatia, including pits, pockets and tuft domatia, are present among plant species in disturbed forests, plantations and gardens of Bangladesh in South Asia. These structures are frequently occupied by mites. Pooling across all species, domatia were often (66%) occupied by mites and used by them for shelter, egg-laying and development. On average, 70% of all mites on leaves were found in domatia, and over three-quarters of these were potentially beneficial (i.e. of predaceous or microbivorous taxa) to the plant. Further, when species were pooled across sites, leaves of domatia-bearing plants had significantly more predaceous mites than those of plants without domatia. These results are consistent with the patterns of mite-domatia association reported in Australasia, North America and North Asia and with predictions of mutualism between plants and mites.

Keywords

BangladeshdomatialeavesmitesmutualismplantSouth Asia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 99 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Grostal, P. & O'dowd, D. J. 1994. Plants, mites, and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia 97:308–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guérin, P. 1906. Sur les domaties des feuilles de Diptérocarpées. Bulletin de Société Botanique de France 53:186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, G. W. 1978. A manual of acarology. 2nd Edition. Oregon State University Bookstores, Oregon, USA. 509 pp.Google Scholar
Lundströem, A. N. 1887. Von Domatien. Pflanzenbiologische-Studien. II. Die Anpassung der Pflanzen Thiere. Nova acta Regiae Societatis scientiarum upsaliensis, Series 3, XIII.Google Scholar
O'dowd, D. J. In press. Mite association with the leaf domatia of coffee (Coffea arabica) in north Queensland, Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research.Google Scholar
O'dowd, D. J. & Pemberton, R. W. In press. Leaf domatia in Korean plants: floristics, frequency, and biogeography. Vegetatio.Google Scholar
O'dowd, D. J. & Willson, M. F. 1989. Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37:191–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'dowd, D. J. & Willson, M. F. 1991. Associations between mites and leaf domatia. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemberton, R. W. & Turner, C. E. 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. American Journal of Botany 76:105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, D. E. & O'dowd, D. J. 1992a. Leaves with domatia have more mites. Ecology 73:1514–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, D. E. & O'dowd, D. J. 1992b. Leaf morphology and predators: effect of leaf domatia on the abundance of predatory mites. (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environmental Entomology 21:478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, D. E. & O'dowd, D. J. In press. Life on the forest phylloplane: hairs, little houses, and myriad mites. In Lowman, M. E. & Nadkarni, N. (eds). The forest canopy: a review of research on a biological frontier. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Willson, M. F. 1991. Foliaṙ shelters for mites in the eastern deciduous forest. American Midland Naturalist 126:111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar