Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:58:04.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why N.C.D.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

M. C. Bennett
Get access

Extract

This paper was originally written as a Note for the Institute of Actuaries Students' Society on ‘N.C.D. Systems in Motor Insurance’. This topic was one of nineteen non-life topics on which Notes were requested by the Students' Society in 1973, a different member of the Society being responsible for each topic. The Notes were not expected to give the results of research work along previously unexplored lines. Rather, they were intended as a survey of existing knowledge in each subject—including references to any useful literature—which could be understood by and be of general interest to members of the profession who had little or no experience of non-life work.

Following a request from the Manchester Actuarial Society, it was decided to revise and expand the original Note to make a paper more suited for discussion. No Claim Discount (N.C.D.) is one of the more controversial areas of motor insurance, being a topic on which the motorist is liable to hold strong and emotive views from time to time. As now written the paper takes a critical look at N.C.D. systems, as well as outlining their basic features.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , October 1974 , pp. 87 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of Actuaries Students' Society 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1) Beard, R. E. ‘Some Statistical Problems Arising from the Transaction of Motor Insurance Business’. J.S.S. (1964), 17, 279.Google Scholar
(2) Beard, R. E. ‘Some observations on no-claims bonus schemes in motor insurance’. Transactions of the 18th International Congress of Actuaries, 1968, II, 345.Google Scholar
(3) Delaporte, P. J. ‘Principes de tarification de l'assurance automobile par la prime modelée sur le risque’. Transactions of the 17th International Congress of Actuaries (1964) III, 560.Google Scholar
(4) Delaporte, P. J. ‘Tarification du risque individuel d'accidents d'automobiles par la prime modelée sur le risque’. The ASTIN Bulletin, (1965), III, 251.Google Scholar
(5) Derron, M. ‘A theoretical study of the no-claim bonus system’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1963), III, 62.Google Scholar
(6) Eagles, L. M. ‘The actuarial assessment of a newly established motor insurance business.’ Transactions of the 18th International Congress of Actuaries (1968), II, 415.Google Scholar
(7) Franckx, , Ed. ‘Théorie du bonus’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1960), I, 113.Google Scholar
(8) Gürtler, M. ‘Bonus ou malus?’ The ASTIN Bulletin (1963), III, 43.Google Scholar
(9) Johnson, P. D. and Hey, G. B. ‘Statistical Studies in Motor Insurance’. J.I.A. (1971), 97, 199.Google Scholar
(10) Loimaranta, K. ‘Some asymptotic properties of bonus systems’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1972), VI, 233.Google Scholar
(11) Martin, D. B. ‘Automobile Insurance: Canadian Accident-Free Classification System’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1960), I, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Mehring, J. ‘Die Versicherung von Kraftfahrschäden in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’. Transactions of the 16th International Congress of Actuaries (1960), BI, 5.Google Scholar
(13) Philipson, C. ‘The Swedish System of Bonus’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1960), I, 134.Google Scholar
(14) Vepsäläinen, S. ‘Applications to a theory of bonus systems’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1972), VI, 212.Google Scholar
(15) Welten, C. P. ‘The unearned no claim bonus’. The ASTIN Bulletin (1968), V, 25.Google Scholar
(16) Consumers' Association. ‘Car Insurance’, Money Which? (December 1969 and September 1972).Google Scholar