Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:07:39.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tibet in Anglo-Chinese Relations: 1767–1842

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Alistair Lamb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From 1764, when the British position in Bengal was established beyond challenge, until 1842, when the Treaty of Nanking gave Britain the island colony of Hong Kong, the shortest route between British and Chinese territory lay across the Himalaya mountains. Until the Gurkha War of 1814–1816, the southern slopes of the Himalayas and the states that lay along them formed a narrow buffer between British territory and Tibet. As a result of the Gurkha War, British influence was brought right up to the Tibetan border, through the annexation of Kumaon in the western Himalayas, and through the establishment of a vague protectorate over the tiny hill state of Sikkim. Tibet had been evolving into a Chinese dependency since the beginning of the eighteenth century. This process, nearly complete by 1750, reached its final stage in 1792, when Tibet became, to all intents and purposes, an integral part of the Chinese Empire. The British in India were well aware of their proximity to this outpost of the power of the Chinese Emperor. In a period when British dealings with China were confined to trade at a single port, Canton, in conditions that were far from ideal, it would have been most surprising if no attempts had been made to develop Anglo-Chinese relations across the far from impassable barrier of the Himalayas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 89 , Issue 3-4 , October 1957 , pp. 161 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 162 note 1 Hodgson MSS (in India Office Library). Vol. 1, f. 26. Sketch of the Relations between the British Government and Nepal, quoting Select Committee to Home Government, 25th Sept., 1767.

page 162 note 2 In 1767, in response to an appeal from the Raja of Patan, the Bengal Government dispatched Captain Kinloch and a small force to try to arrest the advance of the Gurkhas. Wheeler, J. Talboys, Short History of India, London, 1889, p. 463Google Scholar.

page 162 note 3 Home Miscellaneous Series in India Office Records. Vol. 219, f. 325.

page 162 note 4 S. C. Sarcar. Some notes on the intercourse of Bengal with Northern Countries in the second half of the eighteenth century. Proc. Indian Historical Records Commission, vol. xiii, 1930, pp. 104–105Google Scholar.

page 163 note 1 See: Markham, C. R., Narratives of the Mission, of George Bogle to Tibet, and of the Journey of Thomas Manning to Lhasa, London, 1876Google Scholar. Cammann, S., Trade through the Himalayas, Princeton, 1951Google Scholar.

page 163 note 2 Markham, , Narratives, op. cit., pp. 5–8Google Scholar.

page 164 note 1 Markham, , Narratives, op. cit., pp. 195–6Google Scholar.

page 165 note 1 Markham, , Narratives, op. cit., p. 134Google Scholar.

page 165 note 2 Markham, , Narratives, op. cit., pp. 207–210Google Scholar. Cammann, op. cit., p. 67, n. 64, makes out that this memorandum was dated July, 1779. This cannot be so, since it is quite clear the statement of Hastings, of April, 1779, which is quoted below, is an answer to Bogle's proposals. Cammann has only seen this document in a quotation from Sarcar, op. cit. p. 121.

page 166 note 1 Home Miscellaneous, vol. 219, f. 375. Extract from Bengal General Consultations, 19th April, 1779.

page 166 note 2 Cammann, op. cit., pp. 76–80.

page 167 note 1 Turner, Samuel, An Account of an Embassy to the Court of the Teshoo Lama in Tibet; containing a narrative of a journey through Bootan, and part of Tibet. London, 1800, p. 373Google Scholar. Turner's report to Hastings on his return, dated 2nd March, 1784.

page 168 note 1 Home Miscellaneous, vol. 219, f. 469. Hastings to B. Wheeler, 22nd April, 1784.

page 168 note 2 Turner, , Embassy, op. cit., pp. 419–433Google Scholar. Home Miscellaneous, vol. 608, f. 33.

page 168 note 3 Morse, H. B., The Chronicles of the East India Company Trading to China, vol. ii. Oxford, 1926, p. 162Google Scholar. Quoted from Cathcart's instructions, 30th November, 1787.

page 169 note 1 Pritchard, E. H., The Crucial Years of Early Anglo-Chinese Relations, 1750–1800Google Scholar. Research Studies of the State College of Washington, IV, 1936. Pullman, Washington, 1937, p. 239.

page 169 note 2 Morse, , Chronicles, op. cit., vol. ii, p. 155Google Scholar.

page 169 note 3 Morse, , Chronicles, vol. ii, op. cit., p. 235Google Scholar. Instructions to Macartney, 8th Sept., 1792.

page 170 note 1 CO. 77 79. (A collection of miscellaneous letters relating to the Macartney Mission, preserved in the PRO.) Macartney to Dundas. Off the coast of Sumatra, 25th March, 1793.

page 170 note 2 The somewhat confused history of the two Tibet-Nepalese wars is discussed in: Cammann, op. cit., chapters v and vi.

Diskalkar, D. B., The Tibeto-Nepalese War of 1788–93, Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, vol. xix. Patna, 1933Google Scholar. This prints much of the correspondence between the Company, Tibet, and Nepal that took place during the war.

Home Miscellaneous, vol. 608, f. 33. A summary of correspondence.

SirStaunton, G., Bart., An authentic account of an Embassy from Great Britain to the Emperor of China, etc., 2 vols. London, 1797Google Scholar. Vol. ii, p. 211 et seq.

Kirkpatrick, W., An account of the Kingdom of Napaul. London, 1811, pp. 339–379Google Scholar.

Turner, , Embassy, op. cit., pp. 437–442Google Scholar.

BM Add. MSS. 39, 871. Warren Hastings Papers. Supp. Vol. I, f. 51. S. Turner to W. Hastings, 25th Nov., 1792.

Rockhill, W. W., The Dalai Lamas of Lhasa, etc. T'oung Pao, vol. xi, 1910, pp. 60–63Google Scholar. Gives extracts from Chinese sources.

Imbault-Huart, M. C., Histoire de la Conquête du Népal, etc., Journal Asiatique. Paris, 1878Google Scholar.

page 171 note 1 Home Miscellaneous, vol. 608, f. 33. Bengal Consultations of 6th Jan., 1789, and 9th March, 1789. Staunton, , Embassy, op. cit., vol. ii, p. 217Google Scholar. Diskalkar, op. cit., pp. 367–369.

page 171 note 2 Aspinall, A., Cornwallis in Bengal, Manchester, 1931, p. 178Google Scholar.

page 171 note 3 Perhaps because the balance of payments problem was already on the way to being solved, through the sale of Indian produce at Canton. See: Greenberg, M.. British Trade and the Opening of China, Cambridge, 1951, pp. 9–13Google Scholar.

page 172 note 1 For example: Markham, , Narratives, op. cit., p. 132Google Scholar. Turner, , Embassy, op. cit., p. 364Google Scholar.

page 173 note 1 Kirkpatrick, , Nepaul, op. cit., pp. 371–9Google Scholar.

page 173 note 2 Wright, D., History of Nepaul, Cambridge, 1877, p. 52Google Scholar.

Aitchison, C. U., Treaties, Engagements and Sanads, 24 vols. Calcutta, 1931. Vol. xiv, p. 45Google Scholar.

Home Miscellaneous. Vol. 608, f. 38. Consultations of 10th Nov., 1793, and 10th March, 1796.

The best known of the native agents was Abdul Kadir Khan. See: Philips, C. H. (Ed.), Correspondence of David Scott, etc. Royal Hist. Soc. Camden, 3rd Series. Vol. lxxv. London, 1951, p. 57Google Scholar.

Despatches to Bengal, vol. 31. Bengal Political Despatch, 4th 10, 1797Google Scholar.

page 173 note 3 Kirkpatrick, , Nepaul, op. cit., p. 372Google Scholar.

page 174 note 1 Kirkpatrick, , Nepaul, op. cit., p. 377Google Scholar.

page 174 note 2 Barrow, J., Some Account of the Public Life and a Selection of the Unpublished Writings of the Earl of Macartney, 2 vols. London, 1807. Vol. ii, pp. 203–204Google Scholar.

page 174 note 3 Barrow, , Macartney, op. cit., pp. 228, 267Google Scholar.

Pritchard, E. H.. The Instructions of the East India Company to Lord Macartney on his Embassy to China and his reports to the Company, 1792–1794Google Scholar. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, London, 1938, p. 499Google Scholar.

Macartney to Sir John Shore, 3rd Feb., 1794.

page 175 note 1 Staunton, , Macartney, op. cit., vol. ii, pp. 229–230Google Scholar.

page 175 note 2 Staunton, , Macartney, op. cit., vol. ii, pp. 227–8Google Scholar.

page 176 note 1 Pritchard, Crucial Years, op. cit., p. 360. Pritchard, , Macartney, JRAS, 1938, op. cit., p. 499Google Scholar.

page 176 note 2 Parker, E. H., China Past and Present, London, 1903, pp. 149–150Google Scholar. See also Parker, E. H., Letter from the Emperor of China to King George the Third. Nineteenth Century, vol. xv, 07–12, 1896Google Scholar. Parker, E. H, Nepaul and China, Imperial and Asiatic Quarterly Review, vol. vii, 1899, p. 77Google Scholar. Parker, E. H., China's Intercourse with Europe, pp. 44–45Google Scholar. Morse, , Chronicles, op. cit., vol. ii, pp. 273–276Google Scholar. Eames, J. B., The English in China, London, 1909, pp. 129–130Google Scholar.